Dark Lord Potter Forums Dark Lord Potter Forums  
Go Back   Dark Lord Potter Forums > Common Room > General Discussion
Donate Register Rules Library List IRC Chat FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Donate to DLP PatronusCharm Banner

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-22-2017, 01:54 PM   #1
AmerigoCorleone
Slug Club Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 190
Master of Death: What Should it Mean?

I understand the author wishes for us to believe that the Deathly Hallows were just human inventions and being the "Master of Death" simply means accepting death...

Yet I can't help but feel that this is too much of a copout. I think their should be consequences -positive and negative- to being the Master of Death.

What, in your opinion, should these consequences be?
AmerigoCorleone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2017, 03:39 PM   #2
Atram Noctem
Professor
 
Atram Noctem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 439
No, I really don't think it's anything other than that. The entire series has a strong theme of accepting death, and not controlling it.

As for the consequences - the positive being that you don't butcher your soul in an attempt to live forever, and can deal with the death of loved ones, the negative being that you come off as a bit suicidal.
__________________
Do not feed the plot bunnies.
Atram Noctem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2017, 03:51 PM   #3
Distaly
Second Year
 
Distaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Germany
Age: 20
Gender: Male
Posts: 70
The Deathly Hollows are a fairy tale. I think it is quite safe to follow Dumbledore and just assume the three brothers were accomplished wizards who created those powerful artefacts and with time they became a legend. Today "we" tell that those three items are so powerful they were created by death itself and yielding them will make you his better.

But in the end, this is all legend, or in other words, bullshit.
The three Hollows dont give you anything when you carry them at the same time, execpt their unique powers they each carry.


Of course if you still really want something than you have a wide varity of things to choose, from literally the power over death (as in killing other) to being immortal or simply having a better understanding about death and what it entailts.

Last edited by Distaly; 02-22-2017 at 03:58 PM.
Distaly is online now   Reply With Quote
Thumbs Up 1 Thumb Up
Old 02-22-2017, 05:49 PM   #4
Miner
Seventh Year
 
Miner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: East Coast
Gender: Male
Posts: 211
Personally, Gravesong: Requiem highlighted idealized!Master of Death for me.

Shame it hasn't been updated. Hem.

But beyond that, yeah I don't think there's very much significance to the whole title of Master of Death in the canon universe. Harry didn't mysteriously understand Death a lot better. I dunno if he could hide from Death under the cloak but odds are probably not. He definitely couldn't will Death to kill X or not kill Y.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newcomb View Post
If my obituary reads, "Newcomb was famous for writing Harry Potter fanfiction and shitposting dank memes in forum mafia games," imma be a little tilted.
Miner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2017, 06:05 PM   #5
AmerigoCorleone
Slug Club Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 190
For me, it should mean that Harry has a better understanding of life and death, an intuitive understanding of souls, and perhaps a dash of immortality where he goes through a cycle of reincarnation.
AmerigoCorleone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 06:49 PM   #6
CareOtters
Headmaster
 
CareOtters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Age: 25
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,014
DLP Supporter Donor Star
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miner View Post
Personally, Gravesong: Requiem highlighted idealized!Master of Death for me.

Shame it hasn't been updated. Hem.
You sure about that?

But seriously, the Master of Death is not a title from canon. It's a fanon term. Iirc, in canon someone who collected all three Hallows would master death, not take on a legendary title or fulfill some ancient chosen-one-esque prophecy.

The owner of the wand masters death because he can give death.

The owner of the stone masters death because he can reach past it.

The owner of the cloak masters death because he can avoid it.

Someone with all of them can do all three.

There's no reason to think that combining these items does anything more than the sum of their parts, except perhaps painting an even bigger target on the owner's back than the Elder Wand did on its own.

It's a fun and useful point of divergence, however. And like all other similar points of divergence, the selling point is in the execution, not the idea itself. It's no different than anything else, like stepping through the veil, being sorted into another house, and so on.

There's no real difference to a plot based around a Master of Death than a Because Magic divergence plot. And that's no bad thing. But it has no meaning beyond that which we give it.

The ability to add this kind of meaning and interest to throwaway background details is part of why we all enjoy fanfiction.
__________________
Pineapple does go on pizza.

The Yellow Death - a RWBY fanfiction
CareOtters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2017, 04:51 PM   #7
syed
Supermod
 
syed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 861
I always thought the stone was under used. It could have been used with one of those memory bowls and it could allow the creation of limitless animated portraits. The shades the stone produced reminded me of the echoes of people that were emitted from the brother wand effect. This made me wonder if it could be used as a focus for spells that appear as an avatar form, so the patronus and Fiendfyre as an example of it.

I always wondered if the bridge that the three brothers built is the veil. The cloak could allow free passage, while the hollows could have other effects.
syed is online now   Reply With Quote
Thumbs Up 1 Thumb Up
Old 03-03-2017, 01:30 PM   #8
Keira
Squib
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 5
When I first read Deathly Hallows (I was 17) I wished it would mean something more, like some power for Harry to fight Voldemort.
Keira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2017, 06:57 PM   #9
Darth_Revan
Alchemist
 
Darth_Revan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Empire City
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,320
DLP Supporter Donor Star
Quote:
Originally Posted by CareOtters View Post
But seriously, the Master of Death is not a title from canon. It's a fanon term. Iirc, in canon someone who collected all three Hallows would master death, not take on a legendary title or fulfill some ancient chosen-one-esque prophecy.
The Master of Death title is canon. Xeno Lovegood discusses the subject with the group when they go to him to ask about the Sign of the Hallows.
__________________

Peace is a lie, the greatest lie there is. The truth is strife. Struggle. Pain. Suffering.

And from that turmoil, power. The power to bend the universe to my will.

- Revan, Dark Lord of the Sith
Darth_Revan is online now   Reply With Quote
Thumbs Up 1 Thumb Up
Old 03-04-2017, 12:49 AM   #10
syed
Supermod
 
syed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 861
It would have been epic if Harry unleashed an army of shades to fight the bad guys, I could see Fabian and Gideon joking as they protected moly and her family. Albus and Aberforth fighting back to back. Jame and Sirius charging targets in their animal forms. Every slain member of the order of the Phoenix finally getting justice. Technically they would be finishing their unfinished business, so great reason for ghosts.
syed is online now   Reply With Quote
Thumbs Up 1 Thumb Up
Old 03-04-2017, 01:07 AM   #11
Manatheron
Headmaster
 
Manatheron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth_Revan View Post
The Master of Death title is canon. Xeno Lovegood discusses the subject with the group when they go to him to ask about the Sign of the Hallows.
Verified. As quoted by Xenophilius Lovegood in the Seventh book

"That is a children's tale, told to amuse rather than to instruct. Those of us who understand these matters, however, recognize that the ancient story refers to three objects, or Hallows, which, if united, will make the possessor Master of Death"

"Master or Conquerer or Vanquisher whatever you say"

I ran across a similar discussion elsewhere and actually came back for the first time In about three years to see if there were any good counter arguments. My wife (one of the three reasons I vanished) Argues that Harry was never actually the master of death however.

It's a technicality but he was never in physical possession of all three objects at the same time even if he did have the 'loyalty' of the wand while in the forest it wasn't in his possession, and he chucked the stone before taking possession of the wand.

Putting aside the fact that I think they are a massive Deus Ex that Rowling pulled from some place unmentionable, I agree that there should be some perks, some of the better ones I've seen are an ability to converse with the dead without summoning them (ignoring ghosts, they don't count). The ability to read a person's remaining term alive. (Though the implementation was bullshit, I still maintain it should have been in flux depending on their choices). Insight into weaknesses of people around him wether physical or mental, the ability to cross dimensions ( though everyone seems to require him to use them in conjunction with the veil). Being Deaths servant (they were actually a trap). Being the final arbitrator if someone died 'to early' or cheated death. Taking over as his dimensions death Terry Pratchett style. Gaining a 'spider sense' for when shit was about to go down around him, the ability to slow or stop (but not reverse) time around him. And the ability to resurrect people (again massively broken, There should have been some sevear consequences)

Not a complete list obviously, and some are a lot more broken than others but... -Shrugs-
__________________

Known to be Neutral Good And occasionally DLP's Devil's Advocate

<img src=http://img520.imageshack.us/img520/9650/consequencesrd2.png border=0 alt= />
<font size=1>

Those who would give up a little liberty to gain a little security deserve neither, and will lose both.
~Benjamin Franklin~
Manatheron is offline   Reply With Quote
Thumbs Up 2 thumbs up
Old 03-18-2017, 11:13 AM   #12
seis
Squib
 
seis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Germany, Saxony
Age: 20
Gender: Male
Posts: 6
I don't know if this fits into this thread, but if we are extrapolating what the title means, we should probably be sure what the hollows themself are able to do.
One thing I never understood about the cloak is the extend of it's invisibility. Could you be seen by certain spells or moodys eye?. What about muggle things like throwing paint on the cloak?. Would the paint cover it and make you stand out?.
But I agree with Manatheron that they are Deus Ex Machinas.
__________________
I'm a russian who lives in Germany, so please show lenience when you see my grammar .
seis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2017, 11:57 AM   #13
Toujourss Pur
Squib
 
Toujourss Pur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Spain
Gender: Male
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by seis View Post
One thing I never understood about the cloak is the extend of it's invisibility. Could you be seen by certain spells or moodys eye?.
Well, it can certainly be seen by Moody's eye, as shown in the fourth book, and dementors can also track people under it. The special thing about it is its durability and the enchantments that make it impossible to summon, maybe among other kinds of spells.
Toujourss Pur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2017, 08:56 PM   #14
syed
Supermod
 
syed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 861
I wonder if moody eye was enchanted by the elder wand. We don't actually know how the eye works or even perceives things. We know there are ways to detect the cloak, that it focuses on hidding visually and magically. If the eye gives a kind of echo location, then it could have seen Harry under the cloak.
I could see the eye being the focal point for numerous, information gathering, divination and sensory spells as possible. Huge advantage for a dark wizard hunter. So even if it could not detect Harry directly, it would gather enough information to realise Harry is there indirectly.
syed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2017, 12:50 PM   #15
seis
Squib
 
seis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Germany, Saxony
Age: 20
Gender: Male
Posts: 6
Quote:
The special thing about it is its durability and the enchantments that make it impossible to summon, maybe among other kinds of spells.
So the Cloak of Invisibility is not invisible? And it won't hide you from Dementors, which are "modern" death in a sense. What a rip-off.
__________________
I'm a russian who lives in Germany, so please show lenience when you see my grammar .
seis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2017, 09:31 PM   #16
Methos
First Year
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 43
There is an one-shot being the master of death = becoming the ultimate necromancer

https://www.fanfiction.net/s/5107098...y-Pet-Inferius
Methos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2017, 09:33 PM   #17
syed
Supermod
 
syed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 861
What if the cloak was enchanted with magics more akin to warding.
syed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2017, 12:55 AM   #18
AzaleaE
Squib
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Gender: Female
Posts: 7
I think quantifying the original powers of each of the deathly hallows is a good idea. My mind immediately jumps to questions about the Elder Wand. What is it that makes it so powerful? Is it amplifying the magic of the user, or just creating a better conduit between the user and their magic?

If the first, it has some very interesting implications. Where is that extra power coming from? (Not that power in JK Rowling's world seems to adhere to the any sort of Law of Conservation.)

If it's just creating a better conduit, it should be possible to replicate that.
AzaleaE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2017, 01:12 PM   #19
Madval29
Squib
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Gender: Female
Posts: 18
From the original post, I would argue that there are positives and negatives to accepting death. There is something to be said for overindulgence. By accepting death too much, there is no caution. By not accepting death, there is too much caution. I wonder if you think that Harry survived because he was the Master of Death or simply because of the horcrux. Maybe a mix of the two? Let me know.
Madval29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2017, 03:02 PM   #20
syed
Supermod
 
syed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 861
The fact the elder wand rightfully under Harry command, and his own wand had triumphed over toms, could have at least weakened/messed the spell enough to ensure only the soul piece was affected.
syed is online now   Reply With Quote


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Master of Death? Tashio No Daiymo Story Search 13 03-30-2010 05:39 AM
Master of Death Taure General Discussion 10 08-05-2007 10:46 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2005 - 2016 DLP Group. All rights reserved.
No personal intellectual property on this site may be used without the credit and express permission of the respective authors.