1. Hey Guest, welcome back to DLP

    As you can see, we've changed our look. We've migrated from vBulletin to the Xenforo forum system. There may be issues or missing functionality, if you find anything or have feedback, please check out the new Xenforo Migration Feedback forum.

    Our dark ("Dark Lord Potter") theme is under heavy development. We also have a light ("Light Lord Potter") theme for those happier with a light background and darker text.

    Dismiss Notice

Manchester Arena attack

Discussion in 'Politics' started by bolko7, May 23, 2017.

  1. Mordecai

    Mordecai Drunken Scotsman Prestige DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2005
    Messages:
    363
    Location:
    Scotland
    High Score:
    3,485
    So you want to...continue doing exactly what has been getting done, and which has comprehensively failed? Sure, why not. But if anyone is basing their position on 'feels', its you. You refuse to contemplate a resolution that doesn't involve speaking you mind, and which doesn't involve revenge. Who cares if it begets more violence, so long as you get your revenge for the last round of violence.
     
  2. GiantMonkeyMan

    GiantMonkeyMan High Inquisitor

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    518
    Location:
    UK
  3. Darth_Revan

    Darth_Revan Secret Squirrel Prestige DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    126
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The Empire City
    High Score:
    2810
    Hmmm, you can extend the olive branch, but you also need the other side to want peace, too. Otherwise, you're just a fool willing to turn the other cheek and get that slapped as well. What worked to end the Troubles won't work to end the turmoil in Palestine, for example, or with Daesh, because neither side in both of those actually want peace.
     
  4. Mordecai

    Mordecai Drunken Scotsman Prestige DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2005
    Messages:
    363
    Location:
    Scotland
    High Score:
    3,485
    Absolutely true, but a willingness to try something...anything other than the current failed approach has to be applauded. Doubling down on failure isn't a good plan in any situation, but even less so in Government.
     
  5. Invictus

    Invictus Heir

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2013
    Messages:
    2,635
    Location:
    Cidade Maravilhosa
    Oh we doing the ignore what the other person just said and put words in their mouth routine now? I mean, I don't remember saying anything about revsnchism was smart or that the current politics worked, but since you're saying I'm saying, I better fix whatever I said before.

    I mean, I think I had just written that aiming for an equilibrated police where the other side is fully engaged while not leaving out any kind of military response that will depend on the circumstances is what a state should aim for. I have this funny idea in my head that a state has to protect it's innocent civilians, even if the people attacking them have good reasons to be angry. Crazy ain't it?

    But I'm sure explaining to the populace that not doing anything, then giving the terrorists legitimacy and giving in to their demands even if partly will go greatly with the population.

    I mean, it's not like we don't have successful examples of pacification while using force of arms too. Like, I'm sure that the fact that the FARCS kept breaking the ceasefires arranged for decades and then, after being broken militarily by the government while said government addressed directly to the problems face by the civilians that historically supported the guerrilla , it decided to give up arms and enter a peace agreement where there was almost immediate and unilateral demobilization with some concessions that were good, but not nearly as much as what the guerrilla aimed as it's objective.
     
  6. Chengar Qordath

    Chengar Qordath The Final Pony Prestige

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    671
    High Score:
    1,802
    No no no. Just let Putin take over half of Ukraine instead of all of it. Let the terrorists kill half of us instead of all of us. That's how you do diplomacy and compromise.
     
  7. GiantMonkeyMan

    GiantMonkeyMan High Inquisitor

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    518
    Location:
    UK
    Corbyn inviting Hezbollah to Parliament is no different to Thatcher inviting Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, the islamist who threw acid in womens faces if they didn't wear a veil, to Downing Street. Corbyn attending ceremonies to commemorate the dead in past conflicts and urging peace whilst respecting individuals involved for their bravery is much like Michael Fallon attending a party in Syria celebrating Bashar al-Assad's re-election with 99% of the vote in 2007. Corbyn condemning the violence in the Ukraine but also condemning the aggressive stance of NATO that he perceives as exacerbating the situation is much the same as Amber Rudd condemning terrorism but promoting the selling of arms to the Saudi Arabian regime who indirectly fund and arm terrorists.

    Sometimes politicians can't have a kneejerk 'bomb everyone we dislike' response and must engage in dialogue but it's the motivations for that dialogue we should look at - whether that diplomacy with abhorrent people is with the goal of seeking greater peace or seeking greater profits.

    (edit: half these posts should probably be in the uk gen election thread...)
     
  8. Darth_Revan

    Darth_Revan Secret Squirrel Prestige DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    126
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The Empire City
    High Score:
    2810
    See, the implication of your narrative there is "It's okay because other people did similar things", whereas my reaction is "All of those things were despicable."
     
  9. Invictus

    Invictus Heir

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2013
    Messages:
    2,635
    Location:
    Cidade Maravilhosa
    We're engaging in whataboutism is now? Putin would be proud.
     
  10. GiantMonkeyMan

    GiantMonkeyMan High Inquisitor

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    518
    Location:
    UK
    That wasn't the intention of my post. How about this: some groups around the world have violent goals due to the circumstances they are in. Do you engage with those groups on a case by case basis where you either bomb them or seek some way to profit from them or do you engage with them in order to try and reach peaceful conclusions to their conflicts?
     
  11. Oment

    Oment The Betrayer

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,570
    Of course they're fucking illiberal, considering the term 'liberal' tends to be correlated with the right wing of the European political spectrum.

    Pedantics aside, but IIRC the more right wing mainstream parties tend to be perceived as stronger on national security issues in the western world, and May does have the advantage of being in the government and having a record to fall back on. (Though that's also a disadvantage given the police cuts that are being heavily touted on Labour-affiliated sites.) Second attack in a few weeks might give May some advantage, though, but also depends on what information becomes known. If it's another homegrown attack it'd be different from a refugee etc.
     
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2017
  12. Darth_Revan

    Darth_Revan Secret Squirrel Prestige DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    126
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The Empire City
    High Score:
    2810
    Hang on, what?
     
  13. Chengar Qordath

    Chengar Qordath The Final Pony Prestige

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    671
    High Score:
    1,802
    I think most people would say that peaceful solutions are ideal so long as:

    1) Both parties negotiate in good faith.
    2) The terms agreed to are acceptable.

    The problem with appeasement is that both those principles tend to be broken. You give away Czechoslovakia for a deal that gets broken six months later.
     
  14. Oment

    Oment The Betrayer

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,570
    I slightly misspoke - not so much liberalism, but the term 'liberal' is very much not of the Left over here. Doesn't mean they don't share the free speech values that liberalism implies, though.
     
  15. Innomine

    Innomine Auror Prestige DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    654
    Location:
    New Zealand
    High Score:
    4,500
    Yet, as you so often say, we deal not in the ideal, but in the realities we face. Corbyn advocates opening a dialogue with the bad people we aren't on the side of, as opposed to listening and financially aiding to the bad guys we support, ie Saudi Arabia.

    This is very true, and extremely confusing when I first moved to Australia. The right wing party is the Liberal part, and the left wing is the Labour party.

    Invictus The only way the solution you are proposing works is if we literally invade and occupy the Middle East long term. Are you still genuinely calling for this, as the best solution to the problem? Because if you aren't, and we start cracking down on Islam in the West, like May is proposing to do, all we are going to do is put desperate people up against a wall where they have nowhere left to turn. A significant percentage of these people will engage in Terrorism, and considering the wide availability of vans and knives, stopping someone determined to cause harm in our societies is all but impossible. Of course, in our attempt to do so we will undermine all the progress we have made, the freedoms we have fought for over the last century.
     
  16. Invictus

    Invictus Heir

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2013
    Messages:
    2,635
    Location:
    Cidade Maravilhosa
    .... Pretty sure you're confusing threads and situations and context. That's important Inomine, context. And lol, I don't remember agreeing with May or being anti-Islam. So, wut?
     
  17. Joe's Nemesis

    Joe's Nemesis High Score: 2,058 Prestige

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    958
    High Score:
    2,058
    LMAO. If there was ever an opportunity for me to spin a thread into a 2nd Amendment argument and get the whole thing booted into the Hall of Shame, this is it.



    (Thank God for self-control)
     
  18. Chengar Qordath

    Chengar Qordath The Final Pony Prestige

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    671
    High Score:
    1,802
    The idea of negotiating with Islamic terrorists has another major snag beyond the points I raised earlier: namely, who the hell do we negotiate with? You could try talking to the leader of on group, but there are dozens of different groups out there. On top of that, most of the terrorist organizations are highly decentralized and have a pretty flexible hierarchy.

    Even if you managed to work out acceptable terms with the head of ISIS, and ISIS actually honored those terms, you'd still have dozens of other groups out there, and a "Provisional ISIS" or "Real ISIS" would spring up within weeks.
     
  19. Darth_Revan

    Darth_Revan Secret Squirrel Prestige DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    126
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The Empire City
    High Score:
    2810
  20. Joe's Nemesis

    Joe's Nemesis High Score: 2,058 Prestige

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    958
    High Score:
    2,058
    Iran lecturing the west on cracking down on terrorism is like France lecturing the US on winning a war.
    :nyan: