Dark Lord Potter Forums Dark Lord Potter Forums  

Go Back   Dark Lord Potter Forums > Great Hall > Hall of Shame
Donate Register Rules Library List IRC Chat FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Donor Bar
PatronusCharm Banner

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-2013, 10:41 AM   #121
LittleChicago
Death Eater
 
LittleChicago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 965
DLP Supporter Donor Star
A person is riding a high with their ego on the internet in forums dedicated to Harry Potter, with arguments on both sides; on left is a steep rocky cliff with a drop of hundred feet down to obscurity, and on the right is the mountain of difficult intercourse. Suddenly he posts a new thread coming from the left, touting his own intelligence and rubbing it in everyone's faces, but loses control and the thread steers away from him.

He has two options now, either to fade away and lurk, which has high chances that he will not be remembered, the other to keep arguing in a forum that does not respect him and never will, which means he will avoid fading away but will meet the mountain from the side and maybe bruise his ego; definite chances of injury but less chance that they will be forgotten. He decides to keep arguing, is that a stupid decision?

Going by your logic quoted above, the action he takes is not unexplainable, it is unlikely that he will get out without a bruised ego, but there is still some chance, not unexplainable. But it still was a stupid decision, because in the other alternative, he would not have been butthurt, but fading away would have been likely. He most probably would have survived and come back eventually. That would have been the smart decision, but according to your logic, as the action he took had some chances of success, even though unlikely, the action is not stupid. There is a possibility of explanation, but in real world, it was a stupid decision.
__________________
"Breaking into writing... is mostly about being stubborn enough to keep your butt in the damn chair and keep working."

- Jim Butcher



LittleChicago is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 10:58 AM   #122
Havaiamas
Second Year
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by LittleChicago View Post
A person is riding a high with their ego on the internet in forums dedicated to Harry Potter, with arguments on both sides; on left is a steep rocky cliff with a drop of hundred feet down to obscurity, and on the right is the mountain of difficult intercourse. Suddenly he posts a new thread coming from the left, touting his own intelligence and rubbing it in everyone's faces, but loses control and the thread steers away from him.

He has two options now, either to fade away and lurk, which has high chances that he will not be remembered, the other to keep arguing in a forum that does not respect him and never will, which means he will avoid fading away but will meet the mountain from the side and maybe bruise his ego; definite chances of injury but less chance that they will be forgotten. He decides to keep arguing, is that a stupid decision?

Going by your logic quoted above, the action he takes is not unexplainable, it is unlikely that he will get out without a bruised ego, but there is still some chance, not unexplainable. But it still was a stupid decision, because in the other alternative, he would not have been butthurt, but fading away would have been likely. He most probably would have survived and come back eventually. That would have been the smart decision, but according to your logic, as the action he took had some chances of success, even though unlikely, the action is not stupid. There is a possibility of explanation, but in real world, it was a stupid decision.
Haha, nice try, but you get my options wrong, I am far too complex for you to comprehend.
Havaiamas is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 11:06 AM   #123
LittleChicago
Death Eater
 
LittleChicago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 965
DLP Supporter Donor Star
Quote:
Originally Posted by Havaiamas View Post
Haha, nice try, but you get my options wrong, I am far too complex for you to comprehend.
It's so cute the way it thinks it's people.
__________________
"Breaking into writing... is mostly about being stubborn enough to keep your butt in the damn chair and keep working."

- Jim Butcher



LittleChicago is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 11:06 AM   #124
Darth Disaster
Seventh Year
The Waking Sith
 
Darth Disaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Two blocks from the beach.
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 233
DLP Supporter Donor Star
Epic Troll-Tagging is Epic.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eilyfe, Ruminating on Reptile eRections
<Eilyfe> If Harry's penis is a snake, can he whisper sweet nothings in parselmouth to excite it?
I edit my posts way too damn much.
Steam Profile
Darth Disaster is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 11:11 AM   #125
Caledfwlch
DA Member
 
Caledfwlch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Avalon
Posts: 165
DLP Supporter Donor Star
Quote:
Originally Posted by Havaiamas View Post
One of your very stupid statements, let me show why with an example.

A person is driving a motorbike with riding gear on a single lane road on the mountains with traffic going to both sides, on left is a steep rocky cliff with a drop of hundred feet and on the right is the mountain of course. Suddenly a truck coming from the opposite side loses control and heads towards him. He has two options now, either to jump down which has high chances that he will die, the other to counter-steer to the right and then again to left which means he will avoid the truck but will meet the mountain from the side and maybe drag along too or fall down, definite chances of injury but less chances that they will be fatal. He decides to fall down the cliff, is that a stupid decision?

Going by your logic quoted above, the action he takes is not unexplainable, it is unlikely that he will survive but there is still some chance, not unexplainable. But it still was a stupid decision, because in the other alternative, he would have suffered many injuries, but death would have been unlikely. He most probably would have survived. That would have been the smart decision, but according to your logic, as the action he took had some chances of success, even though unlikely, the action is not stupid. There is a possibility of explanation, but in real world, it was a stupid decision.

You aren't accounting for magic.
Caledfwlch is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 11:12 AM   #126
Havaiamas
Second Year
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caledfwlch View Post
You aren't accounting for magic.
I am sure modal proposition was not conceptualized with "magic" in mind.
Havaiamas is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 11:13 AM   #127
Lyrium
Sent Back to India
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexicat View Post
Give me 3 examples of smart villains. At least 2 of 3 must be from Fantasy Fiction.
I'd be interested in OP trying to answer this.

However, the distinction is not really whether or not villains are smart. The majority of our cultural products don't allow villains to win so therefore authors\creators must figure out a way to inhibit the villains in some way. Sometimes this is done with hubris, short-sightedness, madness, OCD, etc. Other times it is done with deus ex machina, the hero having exceptional luck, real friends, etc.

Fiction often takes a more binary stance towards good\evil whereas in real life those lines are not as clearly defined and therefore in real life villains do win and may be clearly smarter than the heroes (or in many cases victims) - both of whom may embody qualities generally proscribed to the other.

OP reminded me of this scene in Speed:

Hero and Villain are struggling on top of a subway train.

Villain (Howard Payne): I'm smarter than you, Jack! I'm smarter! I'm smarter!

Jack see's a hanging light and forces villain's head into it's path. Villain looks up at the last moment and screams before being decapitated.

Hero (Jack): Yeah? Well, I'm TALLER!


Well, he's both taller and smarter in this case. The villain was misinformed to the nature of his intelligence.
Lyrium is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 11:20 AM   #128
Theogonia
Second Year
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Germany
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 51
I'll totally regret this...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Havaiamas View Post
Book 1-

Give me the stone Harry, no I won't, give it, nope, GIVE IT! Not a chance. Take it from him Quirell! Takes out his wand, petrificus totalus, accio stone!
Voldemort comes back 3 years earlier.

Book 3-

No Pettigrew, you won't escape this time, pertrificus totalus!

Oh no, Lupin is converting, everyone, quick, petrify him before he converts, everyone casts the spell together, Lupin is petrified!
From your later comments I gained that you, like many here, don't like Harry winning because of sheer luck. With that I'll ask you: What chance would he, as an 11 year old boy, have had against a smart-acting QuirrelMort? I don't think he has even learnt the Expelliarmus- or Protego-spell so, with a smart villain, the "series" would have consisted of about 300 pages. It might have been more realistic, but Harry is the protagonist and, especially since the first few books are meant to be for children, needs some special treatment. Even more so: I'd say that with it being a children's book he is entitled to it to underline the educational goal of this instalment. It means to teach kids to belief in theirselves and hold true to their moral principles even when the odds are against you. That wouldn't really work if Harry were killed in the first book, would it? So IMO it just makes sense to instal a "not so smart villain" as a deus ex or whatever one may call it, even though on a basic level I can understand Quirrel's action to grab Harry.
As I see it grabbing Harry is the most natural action to get close enough to get the stone from him. Quirrel had no way to know that there's still some kind of protection that would hurt him, so he did the (at that point of time) reasonable thing, which was to physically restrain him. Yeah, being a wizard and all would have allowed him to play it "smart" and stupefy Harry, or AK him on the spot, but using Occam's Razor in that regard grabbing him was the easiest and therefore right choice.
Regarding not stunning Harry after that, well children's book and stuff, see above.

I already wrote about the werewolf-issue a few pages back, and I assume that the same goes for animagi: A petrification won't stick if the form shifts.

Would love to write more, but I got stuff to do. Maybe later.
__________________
Theogonia is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 11:34 AM   #129
Havaiamas
Second Year
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lyrium View Post
I'd be interested in OP trying to answer this.
I already have. Steerpike in Gormenghast Trilogy and O'Brien in 1984 I am sure about. Vorbis in Small Gods I think was smart, he was taking down by a deus ex machina, but that is because the book is also a parody. Although, I read this book last about two years ago, can't be sure. I remember like His Dark Materials Trilogy and Bartimaeus Trilogy more than HP series, but it's been at least four years since I read them, can't be sure.

---------- Post automerged at 11:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:21 AM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Theogonia View Post
even though on a basic level I can understand Quirrel's action to grab Harry.
As I see it grabbing Harry is the most natural action to get close enough to get the stone from him.

I already wrote about the werewolf-issue a few pages back, and I assume that the same goes for animagi: A petrification won't stick if the form shifts.
And I clarified why that is not the case, here I go again.

Quirrell was walking backward at him, so that Voldemort could still see him. The evil face was now smiling.

“How touching…” it hissed. “I always value bravery… Yes, boy, your parents were brave… I killed your father first; and he put up a courageous fight… but your mother needn’t have died… she was trying to protect you… Now give me the Stone, unless you want her to have died in vain.”

“NEVER!”

Harry sprang toward the flame door, but Voldemort screamed “SEIZE HIM!” and the next second, Harry felt Quirrell’s hand close on his wrist.


So Quirell was facing backwards, couldn't have grabbed his wrist from that position. So he had to turn, Harry had sprang, Quirell started moving after Voldemort screamed, it's obvious here that he couldn't have grabbed in an instant, which he doesn't, it takes him a second to catch. What it implies is that Quirell moved fast.

Also, my objection is not using spells here, but from the start where Voldemort realized the stone in his pocket. A genius wizard should have instructed Quirell to do that, maybe it could have gone like this, Quirell used a spell but it didn't work because of the protection. Should have tried a few things, I mentioned summoning Harry's pants or the Stone, he didn't know whether there is a spell on the stone to stop summoning, should have tried once at least.

Regarding, petrification not sticking, if that was the case, should have been clarified by Rowling in the novels, it was not, you are just inventing stuff now. Animagus in animal form can be stunned, so can humans, there's no indication that if a petrified person changes form the spell will be removed. Not canon, I won't consider it. I have mentioned many times, if you're assuming stuff, I can also assume stuff to counter your points and make new ones, but that defeats the purpose.
Havaiamas is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 11:51 AM   #130
Zeelthor
Scissor Me Timbers
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,178
You do realize that the first human instinct would be to grab him, not to curse him. Add to that the fear of Voldemort's wrath and the adrenaline, which once more pushes you towards acting. Did Harry even have his wand out?

Seems to me that Voldemort had no reason whatsoever to think there'd be a point to stunning Harry before taking the stone. Hell, it might be that he did not want to cast any magic in Harry's direction, considering how that went the last time.

As for the situation with the werewolf. Perhaps werewolves are resistant to magic. The wounds can't really be fixed by magic, so it's not unreasonable to assume to.

Other than that, see what I said above about fear clouding one's judgement. It's really easy for you to find logical solutions to any given situation from behind your keyboard. It's another thing entirely to make any decision, let alone a good one, in a combat situation.

Hell, I sometimes fuck that part up when I play 5vs5 computer games.
__________________

Snip. Snip. Snip.
Zeelthor is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 12:02 PM   #131
Havaiamas
Second Year
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeelthor View Post
You do realize that the first human instinct would be to grab him, not to curse him. Add to that the fear of Voldemort's wrath and the adrenaline, which once more pushes you towards acting. Did Harry even have his wand out?

Seems to me that Voldemort had no reason whatsoever to think there'd be a point to stunning Harry before taking the stone. Hell, it might be that he did not want to cast any magic in Harry's direction, considering how that went the last time.
Wizards are not like us, they are used to magic, also, I mentioned that he should have tried spells the first thing instead of tryng to coax it from him, that was some minutes before Quirell grabbed the arm. Should have tried summoning the stone at least, and then his pants, see if that works. Many more options, asking and then grabbing is meh.

Quote:
As for the situation with the werewolf. Perhaps werewolves are resistant to magic. The wounds can't really be fixed by magic, so it's not unreasonable to assume to.
Please read the situation again, I posted text from the novel, Lupin started converting many seconds after Black realized he will convert. Please find that or open your book. Should have petrified him and then maybe tried hiding him from the moon's shadow, how do I know Rowling thought of that while writing? Of course now she can invent more stuff, but that's not the point, she didn't think of these possibilities while writing, if she had she would have included stuff which counters this possibility, shouldn't have taken more than a line or two.

---------- Post automerged at 12:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:58 AM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeelthor View Post
Other than that, see what I said above about fear clouding one's judgement. It's really easy for you to find logical solutions to any given situation from behind your keyboard. It's another thing entirely to make any decision, let alone a good one, in a combat situation.
I agree with that, but consider the werewolf situation, before coming out, not only were Black and Sirius hopeful, they were extremely glad! A positive state of mind, not negative, expect better decisions. Black and Lupin mention many times to Peter to not try tricks, while casting the corpse transport spell on Snape and in the Tunnel. They even say they will kill him if he does that, but why? Stun him, they have a stunned Snape, memory cue, a positive frame of mind and a vital situation, and they don't get any ideas. Sorry, I like characters to be smarter than this for me to like the book.
Havaiamas is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 12:07 PM   #132
Caledfwlch
DA Member
 
Caledfwlch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Avalon
Posts: 165
DLP Supporter Donor Star
Since we're getting nowhere fast, what was your issue with pensieves?
Caledfwlch is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 12:14 PM   #133
Havaiamas
Second Year
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caledfwlch View Post
Since we're getting nowhere fast, what was your issue with pensieves?
Oh no, I do have evidence for it, but I won't share it right now. There's a limit to the amount of arguments I can juggle in my head, after this storm has abated, I will post it.
Havaiamas is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 12:20 PM   #134
Zeelthor
Scissor Me Timbers
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,178
You know what? Taure's already explained to you how too much exposition totally blows the pacing.

I've already explained to you that you can't always make logical choices in the heat of combat. I'm not sure if there's any way of explaining it any clearer.

Edit: So because you're happy when a grenade drops in your lap, you're more likely to make a smart decision? Gimme a fucking break. :P

Some of these things could have been explained and done better. Few on this forum would argue that book 6 and 7 were all that good or that Voldemort made 100% sense in them. That said, many of the "points" you've tried to make have failed utterly.

And so have you. Complex my ass.
__________________

Snip. Snip. Snip.
Zeelthor is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 12:27 PM   #135
World
Oberstgruppenführer
 
World's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Axis of Evil (Original)
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,175
DLP Supporter Donor Star
Quote:
Originally Posted by Havaiamas View Post
What? This is not a fan forum? I was looking for fan forums to test my opinions and hone my skills, till now I tried 3 but no response from fans there, someone suggested this.
Alright everybody, thanks for playing. Havajamas, mind your next post, or it might be your last.
__________________
World is offline  
Thumbs Up 4 thumbs up
 

Tags
"i do not think that word means what you think it means", 137 iq!, empirical!, hall of shame inc, i can no longer be bothered to translate this gibberish, i will call it gibberish and not recognize my fallacies even when written clearly because i rock!, inconceivable!, my iq is over 9000!!, rahrahrah i don't like it so it sucks because it's boring, this is too good, this thread is a fallacy, troll in the dungeons, who won? who's next? you decide!, who's epeen is biggest?


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Smart Evil Snape Dr_Orpheus Story Search 22 12-19-2010 12:34 PM
Get Smart Naruto Plot Idea Moridin Other Fandoms Discussion 5 03-06-2010 03:38 PM
Smart Defrag not working Sarah Tech Support 5 08-21-2009 09:45 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2005 - 2016 DLP Group. All rights reserved.
No personal intellectual property on this site may be used without the credit and express permission of the respective authors.