1. Hey Guest, welcome back to DLP

    As you can see, we've changed our look. We've migrated from vBulletin to the Xenforo forum system. There may be issues or missing functionality, if you find anything or have feedback, please check out the new Xenforo Migration Feedback forum.

    Our dark ("Dark Lord Potter") theme is under heavy development. We also have a light ("Light Lord Potter") theme for those happier with a light background and darker text.

    Dismiss Notice

British EU Referendum Thread

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Taure, Oct 13, 2015.

  1. guestreader

    guestreader First Year

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2016
    Messages:
    31
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    High Score:
    0
    You're forgetting that most of the politicians wanted to vote remain. You are therefore relying on politicians to actually do their job and represent their voters over self interest. A risky proposition.
     
  2. Invictus

    Invictus Heir

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2013
    Messages:
    2,590
    Location:
    Cidade Maravilhosa
    Their self interest is to not get kicked out of office.
     
  3. nath1607

    nath1607 Groundskeeper

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2010
    Messages:
    352
    Location:
    Wales, UK
    An interesting question throughout the Brexit debate has been with the UK leaving the EU, would Scotland leave the UK given it voted by large margin to stay afterwards.

    This may now be relevant if activating article 50 has to be done via parliament, as even if the UK parliament chooses to do so I highly doubt that the Scottish parliament would. Does someone know about the constitutionality of this and whether the Scottish parliament would have a say, or whether they could make themselves heard?
     
  4. Fiat

    Fiat The Chosen One DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    2,214
    I am all but certain that the Scottish Parliament doesn't actually have the power to do anything about that, no. They're going to fight for another referendum, and might even get it, but at the end of the day it's the UK Parliament that gets to vote on this kind of thing.
     
  5. Aekiel

    Aekiel Angle of Mispeling Prestige DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    835
    Location:
    The Mouth of Ports
    High Score:
    9,373
    I've been reading a lot of news sites since I started my new job and one of the key points that has been emphasised on everything from the Daily Mail to the Guardian is that only a small minority of politicians have proposed ignoring the referendum. That means that any politician that isn't part of the Green Party (or is likewise extreme in their views) isn't going to attempt to block the invocation of Article 50.

    The fact is that we're leaving the EU. What's up for debate at this point is what our relationship with the continent will be after we've left. Either way we're almost certainly going to wait until after the German elections next winter before getting into the meat of the negotiations.
     
  6. Oment

    Oment The Betrayer

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,496
    Speaking of the Daily Mail, several tabloids (and the Telegraph) are close to having a stroke over the ruling. The Guardian has a rather snide article on it, but the front pages themselves are worth it to see in here.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Truly works of art. Also, the Daily Mail's website headline was this before they changed it slightly:
    [​IMG]
    Aekiel Don't read the DM. It'll rot your brain.
     
  7. Shinysavage

    Shinysavage Madman With A Box Prestige

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2009
    Messages:
    1,005
    Location:
    UK
    High Score:
    2,296
    I and various other members of my old fencing club have been highly amused by the fact that being a fencer is the worst thing the DM feel able to put on their front page with regard to Sir Etherton. I mean, what a bastard.
     
  8. World

    World Oberstgruppenführer Moderator DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Messages:
    3,176
    Location:
    Axis of Evil (Original)
    Obviously if they'd just written "openly gay", that might be homophobic, so they needed another thing to round out the sentence.
     
  9. Invictus

    Invictus Heir

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2013
    Messages:
    2,590
    Location:
    Cidade Maravilhosa
  10. Thaumologist

    Thaumologist Minister of Magic

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    1,378
    Location:
    Chester, England
    So Corbyn's said that unless Britain retains access to the market, he wants Labour MPs to block Brexit, presumably by voting Remain in Parliament. There's little he can do to force them (Whips don't have legal power, other than reporting) apart from what amounts to expulsion from the party (). Whilst this article doesn't go into detail, it does state that
    .

    May's said she plans on carrying out Brexit in full, regardless of the High Court ruling.

    I find it interesting she's appealing the decision, because if she thought MPs would vote in line with their constituencies, there wouldn't be an issue (421 out of 574 constituencies voted leave). Certainly, it could just be not wanting to have shackles put on what Government's powers are, which I can't blame her for, but I guess she doesn't want to leave anything to chance.

    The other thing to bear in mind is that if it has to through Commons, it then has to go through the Lords. They can't block it forever, but they aren't beholden to anyone, and can basically do whatever they want (in voting). This could make enacting article 50 by the end of 2017 a bit tricky.
     
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2016
  11. Taure

    Taure Magical Core Enthusiast Prestige DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    943
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    High Score:
    13,152
    Government's powers*

    They can always force it through the Lords using the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949.
     
  12. FriedIce

    FriedIce Seventh Year

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2013
    Messages:
    211
    Brexit sure as hell isn't a money bill, so they'd have to pass it in consecutive sessions which 1) gives the remain MPs multiple opportunities to fuck with the bill, and 2) would push the carrying out of article 50 to after a new general election.

    It wouldn't stop it, but if the Lords wanted to they'd make life significantly harder for the Government here.
     
  13. Thaumologist

    Thaumologist Minister of Magic

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    1,378
    Location:
    Chester, England
    True. Edited.

    They have to pass it through two sessions, and it'll have been delayed by up to a year.

    That said, the Salisbury Convention does mean that if May does go for early re-election, and makes "follow through on the referendum" part of her manifesto, they can't block it. Given that at least one party is already doing the opposite.
     
  14. Hashasheen

    Hashasheen Totally Sirius

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Messages:
    3,477
    Location:
    Bristol
    Plus it sounds like a posh cunt thing that their typical audience would dislike.
     
  15. fire

    fire High Inquisitor

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2011
    Messages:
    514
    I don't like Corbyn, partly for political reasons (he's too close to the Islamists and the illiberal left), and partly for pragmatic reasons (he'll never win a GE), but he's done the right thing here, the clever thing.

    His promise to block Brexit unless access to the single market is obtained appears very reasonable - after all, most Brits want the common market, and the marginal victory of Leave was gotten off the back of many voters being promised so.

    But of course, we all know the EU will never grant access to the common market without freedom of movement - it would be political suicide for all of the mainstream European parties, left or right, currently in power. If they show to their citizens that you can have access to the common market without needing to let in them dirty foreigners, they'll all be thrown out in short order for the anti-immigrant right.

    No deal May gets from the EU, then, will pass Parliament, assuming there are enough Tories willing to stand up to the Eurosceptic right.

    This could buy us a couple of years.

    This impasse can eventually be broken by a direct referendum upon Brexit without access to the common market - which Leave should lose, since (1) there'll be higher pro-Remain turnout now all the apathetic Remainers have seen the consequences of not voting, or of protest voting, and (2) Leave without common market is considerably less popular than Leave with.

    Or May will simply call a General Election, deselect the defectors, and then it'll be Leave Conservatives vs Corbyn's Labour.

    God save our souls.
     
  16. Bill Door

    Bill Door The Chosen One DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    2,145
    Location:
    Behind You
    Very big assumption. Any Tory who goes against Brexit all but guarantees they lose their seat, either by de-selection or by shedding voters to UKIP in the next election.
     
  17. Quiddity

    Quiddity Auror

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2014
    Messages:
    633
    Location:
    New Zealand
    fire I agree Corbyn's doing the right thing politically, but not because I think Brexit will be stopped. Instead this move puts Labour as the major party who was unwilling to vote for unqualified Brexit, which should be a positive cleavage for them later on. Especially because, as you said, his requirement seems highly reasonable but is very unlikely to occur (and if it does, he looks even better).

    Unfortunate that they were so lukewarmly anti-Brexit earlier. But they may make hay out of this yet.
     
  18. Thaumologist

    Thaumologist Minister of Magic

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    1,378
    Location:
    Chester, England
    Sturgeon's jumping in with "protect Scotland!", but doesn't actually say what she plans on doing. It looks like she's in support of MPs voting on A50 though.

    Also, it has been raised with the CPS that some of the information presented by the Leave campaign was untrue, and known to be so. As such, it counts as deliberate lying to voters, which is an offence (although only from 2006, it looks like. And never actually taken to court). This wouldn't have any impact on the outcome of the referendum itself.

    It's all a bit of a kerfuffle, really.
     
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2016
  19. Khaine

    Khaine Squib

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2016
    Messages:
    9
    High Score:
    0
    Honestly the moment that Parliament actually blocks the brexit the shitstorm is really going to happen, At the point the people of the EU just want them to leave and that's not even mention the pro brexit voters who would most likely riot at a shit move like that.
     
  20. Garden

    Garden Minister of Magic

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2010
    Messages:
    1,261
    Location:
    Florida
Loading...