1. Hey Guest, welcome back to DLP

    As you can see, we've changed our look. We've migrated from vBulletin to the Xenforo forum system. There may be issues or missing functionality, if you find anything or have feedback, please check out the new Xenforo Migration Feedback forum.

    Our dark ("Dark Lord Potter") theme is under heavy development. We also have a light ("Light Lord Potter") theme for those happier with a light background and darker text.

    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Hey Guest! Are you any good at cooking? Got a favourite recipe that you love to cook or bring out to impress that special someone? Why not share it! A new forum called The Burrow has opened and it's all about homemaking!

Feminism 2017

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Mordecai, Jul 1, 2017.

  1. Joe's Nemesis

    Joe's Nemesis High Score: 2,058 Prestige

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    958
    High Score:
    2,058
    Your parents fought communism in 1993 so Xipho couldn't ban you from DLP in 2017?
     
  2. Xiph0

    Xiph0 Administrator Admin

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2005
    Messages:
    8,818
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    People's Republic of California
    Spring cleaning came late. Who's next?
     
  3. The Pro

    The Pro Seventh Year

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2016
    Messages:
    251
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Depths of Tartarus
    High Score:
    0
    I think that not everyone agrees that the user shouldn't have been banned just because of a difference of opinions. However, I doubt that that's all there is to him being banned. There's a notice that clearly says that this forum is heavily moderated and posts are made at the user's risk. User JokeIsAbsolute ignored that.

    Arguing the minutiae of politics is tedious and requires extensive knowledge of the topics. This particular user is entitled to his opinion—as I'm sure Xiph0 agrees—but he didn't offer cogent substantives. He made ridiculously broad, undefined statements and didn't have any facts to substantiate them. At the same time, other users made their own contributions but sought to offer proof for their stance (for the most part at least).

    Having said that, look at it objectively. Xiph0 has a duty as an administrator to help maintain a high standard at DLP. If I were in his shoes I'd ask myself: does this user contribute positively to the discussion? If no, is he just an idiot shitposting? The answer to the first question is an absolute no, while the answer to the second is an absolute yes.

    You might not consider the banned user's posts shitposts. But they are. He demonstrated poorly thought out reasoning and couldn't support his very controversial statements. Him being banned was reasonable, at least that's the way I see it.

    Point is, the mods and admins might seem a bit trigger-happy with bans. Before you call them out though, assess their positions carefully as well as the posts of the banned user(s) and make decisions based on your observations. Based on what I observed, JokeIsAbsolute wasn't actually unfairly banned. Feel free to disagree though.

    EDIT: Well, fuck. She got her ass banned too, right before I responded. Shame.
     
    Last edited: Jul 16, 2017
  4. Xiph0

    Xiph0 Administrator Admin

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2005
    Messages:
    8,818
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    People's Republic of California
    No don't. :p Also yeah, I barely looked at his positions, his post was just a garbage fire. Politics is the most dangerous place you can be shitty in on DLP, because garbage folks can very quickly make Politics insanely bad forever.
     
  5. Sesc

    Sesc Slytherin at Heart Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    Messages:
    5,058
    Location:
    Hbg., Germany
    No, there simply is no free speech on internet platforms at all, and no, it's not what your parents fought against. See the social media/First Amendment thread to discuss this. (The general issue, not DLP.)

    Regarding the particulars, in order to keep the quality of the discussion high, users who consistently fly at underground altitude get removed from Politics. All this is detailed in the Rules for Politics, as linked e.g. from the Must-Read FAQ, so everything's clear.

    We have a thread topic. Carry on.
     
  6. The Pro

    The Pro Seventh Year

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2016
    Messages:
    251
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Depths of Tartarus
    High Score:
    0
  7. awinarock

    awinarock Alchemist

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,250
    Location:
    Texas
    She's full of shit. She's been criticized for the same reason Sean Spicer has; for telling bold faced lies and attempting to pass them off as "alternative facts." It has nothing to do with her gender and everything to do with her character.
     
  8. The Pro

    The Pro Seventh Year

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2016
    Messages:
    251
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Depths of Tartarus
    High Score:
    0
    Yup. I still can't believe she was stupid enough to casually say "alternative facts" when she was called out though. That will never cease to amaze me.
     
  9. Xiph0

    Xiph0 Administrator Admin

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2005
    Messages:
    8,818
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    People's Republic of California
    If a man put his feet on the couches in the West Wing I'd want him hanged. Her dangly bits don't make a difference.
     
  10. awinarock

    awinarock Alchemist

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,250
    Location:
    Texas
    ^Seriously, wth was up with that? I mean, regardless of where you stand politically, you're in the office of the POTUS. Conduct yourself with some dignity and sit like an adult.
     
  11. Immet

    Immet Seventh Year

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2012
    Messages:
    210
    Back to the original question from the survey kicking it off, I was thinking that the definition of feminist needs discussing.

    Is it someone who:
    • campaigns for issues where women are at a disadvantage?
    • actively campaigns for gender equality?
    • is involved in the academic and public discussion of feminism?
    • thinks that there should be greater equality between the genders and acts on that in their day to day life?
    Because I'm starting to try and clarify my personal definition and I'm thinking that it should only applies to those actively campaigning for gender equality. So those who don't campaign but try to treat people the same regardless of gender are not feminists.

    Because feminism is not a religion or belief system, it is a social movement, and unless you are actively involved in the feminist movement then I don't think you are a feminist.

    Feminism started as actively campaigning for issues where women are disadvantaged, but the better parts have expanded to gender equality.

    However it has been accepted that if you think there should be greater equality but don't do anything towards it you are a feminist. Following on from that, if you say that you aren't a feminist because you are not campaigning then you are a misogynist.

    Opinions? Maybe feminism is a belief system and so if you think it without necessarily campaigning or publicly acting on it you are a feminist?
     
  12. calutron

    calutron Unspeakable

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    702
    Didn't Obama rest his feet on the Resolute desk?

    That's also where Clinton got down and dirty right?

    Or do you mean people other than the president.
     
  13. Gengar

    Gengar Polymagus Prestige DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2009
    Messages:
    59
    High Score:
    6005
    Who cares? It's fucking furniture.

    This coming from someone who builds - exquisite :sherlock: - furniture for a living...
     
  14. awinarock

    awinarock Alchemist

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,250
    Location:
    Texas
    Pretty much. The President is the big boss and he/she has the right to chill in the Oval Office however they like.

    So, in my case, it's less about the furniture and more about how much you respect the President and their office. I don't respect Trump, but I'm assuming Kellyann Conway does (or at least his money) so what boggles my mind is how she didn't think that sitting like that while everyone else in the office was standing wouldn't exactly look good. Of course, 5D chess Grand Master Trump might have planned this all along in order to distract the internet for a brief period.


    To me, feminists are people who campaign for issues where women are at a disadvantage. On the other hand, not being a feminist or campaigning for their issues doesn't make someone a misogynist. People have their reasons for not wanting to be labeled a feminist and it's not always because their prejudiced against women.
     
  15. Joe's Nemesis

    Joe's Nemesis High Score: 2,058 Prestige

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    958
    High Score:
    2,058
    That definition is absolutely not applicable anymore, as feminism itself has several different facets, and some of those facets is exactly a belief system, however, I'm getting ahead of myself.

    First (in presentation, not in importance), it's a philosophy. That philosophy gets applied in several academic pursuits such as feminist hermenuetics in historical and biblical studies.

    Second, feminism only applies to white, North American women. So, to expand on that, we must expand to other movements such as the womanist and Mujerista movements. The last proclaims itself a theology for Latino women.
    ....
    Dang, gotta go, whill come back later.
     
    Last edited: Jul 18, 2017
  16. The Pro

    The Pro Seventh Year

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2016
    Messages:
    251
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Depths of Tartarus
    High Score:
    0
    It all depends on the individual's definition of feminism. The one that fits most would be the emboldened definition though, like awinarock said. It makes sense when you think about it, because feminism is supposedly "campaigning for gender equality by advocacy for women's rights". At least, that's what it's supposed to be.

    I might be misconstruing these statements, so it's probably best if you explain what you mean.
     
  17. Xiph0

    Xiph0 Administrator Admin

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2005
    Messages:
    8,818
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    People's Republic of California
    That is literally who I mean, yes. If the people elect you to have the final call on nuclear strikes, you can put your fucking feet up, that's part of your rights. If you're an unelected tag-along, you treat the Office like the Office.

    And let's not pretend Kennedy didn't pump skanks in the Oval.
     
  18. Immet

    Immet Seventh Year

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2012
    Messages:
    210
    That was badly worded. Okay, here's an example. Often one of the questions asked of public figures is 'are you a feminist?'. Without the opportunity to explain your position and personal definition of feminism it boils down to a split of 'do you support the feminist movement or are you a misogynist?'

    Lots of public figures have been asked this including recently Angela Merkel. So, unless they answer the way that feminist movements would like them to they are attacked. Just imagine what would have happened and the uproar had Angela Merkel said that she wasn't part of the feminist movement so she isn't a feminist.
     
  19. Eilyfe

    Eilyfe Death Eater

    Joined:
    May 27, 2014
    Messages:
    956
    European feminists would like to have a word with you, sir. Far as I know, the origins of the movement are situated with gals like Wollstonecraft and Dohm - all perfectly non-American. :p
     
  20. The Pro

    The Pro Seventh Year

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2016
    Messages:
    251
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Depths of Tartarus
    High Score:
    0
    This is incredibly stupid reasoning. Just because I don't support feminists means I automatically hate women? Bullshit.

    People have their own reasons for not wanting to be affiliated with feminism. Some don't want to be affiliated with the extremists. Some just don't care enough. Some just don't want to engage in any activism. It could be anything.

    That whole line of reasoning is precisely why there are people who don't want to be labelled feminists. The face of feminism is no longer equality for women. The movement has devolved nowadays and is associated with ludicrous, silly people like the ones who use that kind of reasoning.