Vote: Kalas

Someone's going to need to address the Owner/Reg not being aligned issue at some point.

 

Here's the only things I found inside Owners ISO that mean a whole lot interaction wise;

Find this interaction pretty unlikely to happen between scum partners; I think Owner asking her partner if he has a truth meta while knowing that he most certainly doesn't is unlikely. Points heavily towards Vaimes being town.

The above combined with how Vira handled Owner is a pretty decent indication that Viras town here.

This interaction combined with the follow up of her moving from Miner to Jarizok and stating he's her main scum read points decently towards Jarizok being town here.

This comes across as a throwaway question towards a partner here.

 

Those aren't rambling. Rough draft isn't inaccurate about 930. Posted it 1230-1ish my time then went to bed.

Vote: The Waco Kid

1287 remains unaddressed.

 

Fable, can I ask why you used the words "I fear" here? That seems overly dramatic for you. Do you think a D1 mislynch is a big concern? What exactly are you afraid of?

---------- Post automerged at 10:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:46 PM ----------

Reg, I don't find the unalignment thing with Jari convincing, I think. Can you maybe elaborate on it?

 

Going from "Why are you voting me?" To an AtE mixed with "well of course he's voting me, he's scum." What an interesting turnaround.

 

So hot. My feat. They burn.

---------- Post automerged at 12:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:19 AM ----------

Burn all the feats!

 

I'm surprised you can feel anything in your feet when Vira's already so thoroughly burned you.

 

That's what you'd say now wouldn't you

 

Nah it's of course not the end of the world if owner was a mislynch but you never wanna mislynch anyone and I can be a bit of a perfectionist at times.

 

1 out of 3 valid criticisms. 1st degree burns are chilld's play.

 

The reason I felt it was not w/w was because reg was quick to wolf read owner specifically on her playstyle and he didn't like her jan read either and I think he was inferring they were w/w.

 

Oh look, something to discuss that actually contributes to the thread. Opinion on my Fable/Waco thoughts fonti?

 

This deflection is super gross ftr.

 

It's cute that you think I can deflect fonti.

 

The "The fuck are these" are at two people throwing down a naked vote on me that hadn't mentioned having a scum read on me at any point in the past; the lack of explanation behind the progression is both problematic and frustrating. And I've had a scum read on you throughout majority of the game.

 

That seems like a meta thing I wouldn't have knowledge of, what I can tell however is you seem to think your discussion with vira doesn't forward the thread but being nitty and talking about my wording choices does.

 

Yes. People scum reading me does not forward the thread as they're either misreading things are happy to sit in their own biases.

I don't give a crap about your wording choice. I saw fonti entertaining a 'Fable is weird thought' and wanted her opinion on my 'Waco is weird wrt Fable thought'.

---------- Post automerged at 12:38 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:38 AM ----------

EBWOPr are happy

---------- Post automerged at 12:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:38 AM ----------

EEBWOP: *or are happy

 

Will start doing mass rereads of people / their interactions with Owner once the Gravedigger has claimed since I don't want to waste a lot of time going down the wrong world here in the slim chance she wasn't mafia. Going to take it everyone that's checked in so far isn't the Gravedigger and that it might actually be Vaimes.

If anyones got any questions / things they want me to look at let me know.

 

Disagree with the first part, if people are misreading you as you say then working out that read with them does forward the thread absolutely. In fact I would argue if you are a villager allowing people to wolf read you while doing nothing to put them on the correct path is actually harmful.

As for the second part how does waco's behavior towards me connect to fonti taking issue with my wording? Seems like a clumsy segue.

 

It's going on 1. I have to call it a night. See ya.

---------- Post automerged at 12:52 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:43 AM ----------

God you're pedantic. I have pointed out issues with how players have read my posts. Going back and forth on what post #xyz really meant is not going to change minds. Contributing elsewhere is.

Waco had a scum read that just trailed off and disappeared with you. That's suspicious, potential distancing that got dropped/forgotten as thread pressure moved off of you. Even if I disagree with it fonti saw something worth poking in your post. Do you see how I'd be interested in her thoughts here?

---------- Post automerged at 12:53 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:52 AM ----------

In fact permission to garcia. What are your thoughts on Waco's Fable read progression?

---------- Post automerged at 12:53 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:53 AM ----------

Bed. For real this time.