Pretty sure I gave my reasoning at EoD, owner.

Fake reaction to the beruru lynch.

 

The ambiguity was intentional, the question was rhetorical.

 

This is fake too.

 

Sort of interesting that said Vaimes here or sort of like checking a teammate would be plausible thing to do.

So likely Miner or Vaimes is definitely with Tom.

 

If you're town, I sincerely encourage you to pursue this read. Really throw yourself into it and commit. it's not like I'm getting lynched anytime soon, and the meme of your utter inability to read me is kind of too good not to have, postgame.

(For the record I think that even with the handicap of replacing in and not re-reading I've been pretty obviously town)

 

I don't understand you.

---------- Post automerged at 11:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:12 PM ----------

This is in direct contradiction of like a post you made five mins ago that I can't link because rip phone.

 

/tencharacters

 

This one.

I feel a lot better about an owner lynch now.

 

You've tried to appear town and done a pretty good job of it, I'll give you that
But I think my scum!Newcomb radar is under-sensitive, which means the fact that you just triggered it twice means that I'm either discounting something (which I'm currently checking for), or I should be extremely wary

 

So your point is?

That one was meant to be abrupt. But at this point what you say kind of matters if you know what I mean.

 

Cred is mine Vaimes.

 

#VaimesislikelyanElderWitchimo

 

Really? Was expecting you to double down, not hedge.

Are you sure you're not a witch?

 

I wanted to focus on Owner before it was cool thanks

 

Unvote, vote owner

 

newcomb>citrus

 

I actually had a double down post typed out, then thought about how embarassing it would be if I were /that/ wrong, then decided I should follow the trails for possibilities I discounted something first as I haven't fully wrapped my mind around things yet

 

Just, like, in general?

You're not wrong, but what does it have to do with this game.

 

It wasn't fake. That was my true read of her. I read her town. And how quickly votes formed on her supports that there was likely a witch in her wagon.

Just because you don't see what is going on in my head doesn't mean I'm not solving the game.

 

Also that's not really a hedge? Just a 95% commit instead of 100%?

Under-sensitive means it goes off rarely but it's pretty much always right when it does go off. Vs. over-sensitive meaning it usually goes off but if it doesn't then that's what tells me something useful