Okay, I'm on the Stanari wagon now.

Tonally, just.... really stilted reactions.

Unvote; Vote: Stanari

 

Why is everyone confused this game.

 

This seems overblown in a possibly not-genuine way.

 

What's your perception of what I should be reacting like?

 

Why is there a Stanari wagon.

 

But... But the vote's on Vaimes.

 

How so?

 

I disagree with this read, by which I mean I'm neutral on the post itself. Feel like elaborating?
--- Post automerged ---

Why do you think there shouldn't be a Stanari wagon?

 

Pterodactyl noises.

 

I'm going to wait until RVS is over to actually begin looking at Stanari. Feels like she'll get infinitely easier to read given with time when I can parse through the one liners/fluff.

Zack - Given Scott's experience level (two games, I think?) the way he's approaching the Stanari read feels more like he is trying to poke Stanari with a stick and is trying to figure out what exactly is going on, over something a little more malicious. I dunno, just my interpretation of Scott's last couple of posts or so.

 

Now you've done it. If you were a townread, this would probably cast the tiniest bit of suspicion on Vira for me, but I'm leaning scum on you, so I'm not sure if this weakens my read or reinforces it.

 

I mean what do you want me to say, it seemed overblown because it seemed overblown. Shrug. Dunno why you'd actually get that riled up by something fairly trivial. The "frown" in particular came off as a weird inclusion.

 

This appears to be so.

To be clear, I wasn't trying to answer your question, it was just a thought related to your post.

 

Oh god why didn't you say this sooner lol.

Also, Scott seems to be super defensive, but given that he's pretty much new that's actually probably NAI? At least I remember being super defensive in general in my first game.

 

Can you explain this a little more, Scott?

If Stanari was a townread, why would Vira making that statement make Vira suspicious to you?

Having a little trouble comprehending what you're saying here.

 

Because it seems to stem from your one post about not answering questions about your Vaimes vote and I don't think people should be questioning it.

What are you even saying?

 

Agreed on my including the frown, that was probably an unnecessary bit of silliness in an otherwise serious post. And maybe Stanari's vote was trivial, but the way she followed it seemed off to me.
--- Post automerged ---

Agreed on my including the frown, that was probably an unnecessary bit of silliness in an otherwise serious post. And maybe Stanari's vote was trivial, b
--- Post automerged ---
Ugh, doublepost.

 

Hardclaim Miner is my n0 peek.

 

Vaguely informative.

I guess.

You have no idea how many fluffposts I've had to restrain myself from making already.

Anyway, uh, good luck with that.

I kind of like this post.

 

Quote what posts that seem to be "super defensive" to you?