I should probably go back and read the part of the thread i haven't yet, because rn im just confusing myself trying to ISO ppl, and have discussions at the same time live while still not being caught up .

 

I think I also played with both of you in the mountainous game, no?

I would do prophy over Jan right now. But I didn't get support for it earlier.

 

Alright, thank you!

Because the only thing that's stuck to me from reading some of your earlier post was how happy you seemed, lol'ing at several points etc.

Have a weak weak townlean!

 

I'm not following. You expected him to keep trying to talk to you after yo

^ This isn't skipping over anything.

 

Cya in a bit

 

I expected that after GH came back he would want to respond, seeing as he established the conversation. I was waiting for this response.

Tom and Fable are town. Maybe Wei as well but I need to reread him. Proph has felt off all game, I'm iffy on Vira and Cuth has flagged me pretty much since their entrance but they need

 

Getting a lot of one sentence/5 words per sentence type reads from Koalas.

Not a lot of... in depth thought being shown there.

 

* a reread since they're new to me.

 

Hrm, i actually see quite a potential for relevance there, especially coming from SS and what I know of him. And kinda like him for asking it tbh.

Do you try to look for people's mindset as town? Or is that something you pretty much disregard?

 

@fontisian

This:

Is not a response to this:

It's waiting to see how I reenter thread to tailor their approach. Stop being bad.

 

Like, Kalas, I'm trying to find what you might have expected GH to rrspond to, and I'm not seeing anything.

 

What stunning insights you've drawn from my ISO.

 

Ok, thank you. I don't think you own post was structured in a way that seened to want a response.

 

How is that fair?

A. Pretty sure Vaimes had 3 votes either when I subbed in or in the hours before I did.
You can say that I gave the townread on him because I knew others might do it later, but when I am the first person to give the read while others are voting on him, then I am never sheeping.

B. The Fable thing was 50% real gut and thought and 50% let's see what happens and if other people react or do anything.
People don't do a lot at the moment.
His reaction was ok, but not in a way that was clearing, but I didn't want to push his buttons more than the accusation in itself did.

C. The Newcomb thing is a blatant lie.
My scumread on Newcomb was because his misrepresantion of an obvious joke.
Without context the post he was reading might look serious, but in context it just never is.
People looking at the post in Newcombs might be able to nod along, but once you look at the when and how the post happened, you know it is pure bullshit.

Newcombs early catchup stuff including 0 spice is something that added on to it later.
I even said that his latest catchup was better and I am iffy on Newcomb because of that.

D. The Stanari thing is not me getting bored. I thought she was town half way through her iso and reading20+ pages of her scumgame that she linked basically strengthened my read.
Why would I read another 100 posts, when I already have a read on said person?


Fable can be butthurt as much as he wants, but you can not call his summary of my play "fair", when it is not.

I have spent more time in this thread after I subbed in than most people, despite being sick, having friends over and having a roleplay round for the last 3+ hours.

 

What potential for relevance? What do you see to get out of it?

Regarding the second part... not to be snarky but I don't think you've read any of my posts in the game if you're asking that question. It should be pretty clear that it is something I value and that I do not see any value in asking what SS did.

That's super light to give him a townread or whatever for it. Sure he can't ask it as scum?

 

Can I just get something straight?

You're saying that your original reason for not voting GH was because he responded to you in a manner you read as town, which you then responded to again yourself. And then you didn't vote because you were waiting for him to respond again.

However, now that he's back he hasn't responded to you, and so this lack of response makes you suddenly think he's scum again?

 

Refuting that his post is fluff? Answering my question on why he formatted it like he did? He acknowledged it was weird then kind of.. left it. Even making the same post you did and going 'not sure what you're trying to say here Koalas.' Or anything really. He set up a discussion, peaced for 24 hours, then ignored it when he got back.

 

About as stunning as the insights you gave in it, to be fair.

 

Full story as I see:
Gh: I'm see these responses as scummy/towny/whatever.
Kalas: Bullshit, those responses were basically the same.
GH: This is why I think they're different.
Kalas: I still think they're the same and you're faking content.

Long gap.

GH: I'm waiting for Kalas to come back before making a decision on him.

Kalas: You didn't respond to my last post because you don't care about figuring out my alignments. Votes.

There's a huge disconnect there.

 

SS/Tsa, I can clarify my stance on it, but I'd prefer you to say what you get out of those questions first.