Someone calls half a scumteam and the only thing you do is "But what about that 4th person? Bitch please."?

 

I Kinda agree. But if it was a scumslip do you think it would say 2-3 more? I mean if it was a slip wouldnt it be either 2 more or 3 more?
--- Post automerged ---

I gotta admit its pretty bad. Its Kinda like xicor going "you have no proof"

 

Sorry, I'm still reeling from Miner going wolf on me.

I really disliked Yeti's aggro early and there were too many question marks in some of her posts (as in, she used 9 instead of a reasonable 5/6 per sentence), but she's since improved. Kinda want to vote elsewhere for today at the least so she can get fully settled in.
--- Post automerged ---

Lol, that would've been even worse. "You missed Fonti and Newcomb brah."

 

I don't know how to read miner.

 

Koalas's focus for his votal analysis post seems odd. This line stuck out to me especially:

Seems like overplaying his backup claim a bit. I'm getting the sense of "scum should have thought me, the backup, is the biggest threat and therefore should have been the lynch target", but when you look at that view, it doesn't make sense? Scum wouldn't know GH was vanilla 100% ahead of time. Not sure if to derp clear, or attempting to slip in a derp clear. I really dislike the "even as a Vanilla" bit.

I know I was convinced of Cuth/Koalas not knowingly aligned yesterday, but is this also a slip that Cuth is not vanilla with cuth/koalas w/w? (tinfoil world)

His two read posts also both feel really vague, even vaguer than the feeling I got from Cuth's posts yesterday. His read on Cuth for example, he hated his intro and then generally disliked his posts after? And then his second reads post is "nothing changed on Cuth".

He also has this whole paragraph on people who he dislikes the votes of based on scenario 2:

And I'm finding it odd that I'm apparently his take away focus from that? Where did Jan disappear to?

Vote: Koalas

 

What thoughts make you feel this way?
I'd like to give you the benefit of the doubt that this isn't just omgus but I've seen no signs of that.

 

Reading through SR now. Trying to not bias my read of Cuth due to my reads of Koalas and Yeti.

 

Like the koalas wagon, and Jan's ramblings about him.

Kinda think we're letting yeti off the hook too easily but nbd.

 

Actually...good catch.

 

It would btw be kinda hillarious if you are scum and just mentioned the remaining 2 scum for The lulz.

But Yeah i Kinda wanna say miner probably just meant it like mentioned later, wanted to know if dyachei was Also part of that scum list.

But no matter how i twist and turn it, saying im "missing 2-3 scum" doesnt add up to "is dyachei one of the remaining scum you didnt list"
--- Post automerged ---

Just have to mention i accidentally thumbs upped this post but removed it immediatly.

 

Revenant (6): .113, Stanari, tom, Newcomb, Zack, Fonti
Koalas (5): Revenant, Vira, Fable, Jan, Weiyaoli
Yeti (2): dyachei, Miner
Cuth (2): Yeti, Koalas
tom (1): Jarizok
Newcomb (1): Vaimes
Zack (1): owner

Abstaining (2): Tsaiah, Cuth

 

Ty

 

Vote: Koalas

 

I think Tsaiah fell asleep again :S

 

@Jarizok notice how miner actually disappeared after you said that? Its even worse tbh.. Like "disappear and hope it blows over" bad
--- Post automerged ---
Updated scumteam

Koalas, SR, Vira, miner

 

You get a solid ????? for this post.

 

Updated scumteam

Why?

 

That seems incredibly unreasonable.

 

I mean, we were all thinking it.

But yeah, don't think you can really say that's evidence either way 113.

 

vote: miner