First!

Regfan told me that Gemma's such noob that the proper thing to do is to quicklynch immediately

vote Gemma

 

Hi everybody. Gemma made me play, so let's punish her.

Vote Gemma

 

Another good solid reason!

 

My Face Right Now. Who's the worse culprit, the one who started this wagon with a suggestion of a quick lynch, or the one who decided to jump on it at once? Welp,

Lynch Vote Fluff.

I think the bandwagoner.

 

No faith in Regfan's wisdom?

 

Would you believe that I wrote that post before I refreshed and saw Tammy?

 

I don't recall what, if any game, he and I have overlapped on. So no.

Afraid not, bucko. As I was writing this post I got the alert that a new message had come up. Whether or not that holds true for the full post page rather than these quick reply boxes I don't know but I'm fine with my vote where it is at the moment.

 

Wait are you actually being serious right now Zenzao?

 

Yes. I'm out of RVS.

 

Okay this beginning is really weird. I'm not sure if it's because being in a particular mood because irl stuff or something actually game related which may be alignment relevant or maybe it's site culture and you guys usually start the game like stuffed shirts and maybe I'm completely out of my element here?

If Gemma does turn out to be scum though, Zenzao's response may actually be something. I just really do not understand his opening at all.

 

Or to put it another way, I was never in RVS. I was hoping there would be more early posts to make a judgment call on, but what little there was between you two still felt like it had enough meaning to justify my vote.

And so it begins. Feel free to swap your vote to my name if you feel there's something there.

 

Why would you think either are anything other than jokes?

Why wouldn't someone jump on the first bandwagon that was started? It's RVS neither are actually serious and going anywhere.

 

In my experience, players' who do RVS vote don't tend to follow the same wagon that soon unless there's something amiss. Sure, D1 can generally be treated as a crapshoot for early analysis, but this is how I assess other players and make my decisions.

 

There are some people who believe that people who don't follow the opening RVS wagon are doing it for reasons that are amiss.

Why couldn't it be two players who independently came up with a joke reason for the same person? Also your little box reasoning doesn't really diminish his answer. My post wouldn't have popped up with the little box showing a reply. I know because that just happened to me. So I don't understand your response to his.
--- Post automerged ---

Why such a serious response to what can only be a joke???

 

Hi.

Who’s scum?

 

His post doesn't take two+ minutes to write, so I don't buy that he didn't see you voted first. My reasoning about new messages does stand at least in quick reply, because it shows up with a white bar and the following

1. Messages have been posted since you loaded this page. View them?

right above the quick reply box when someone makes a new post. As I said, I don't know if that holds true for full reply. With that said, I do feel like this is going too far into left field when we're arguing over a matter of site coding more than possible behavior. Not shifting my vote since you're really doubling down on your defense of Fluff, however.

You most certainly have not played with me before or read any of the games that I've played in(which is fair, as I haven't done the same for you or anyone else I'm currently unfamiliar with), but I am usually serious straight out of the gate.

Hi, Vaimes. Lovely to see you've joined the game.

You can obviously see where my vote is. Feels too early to pin two scum in Fluff/Tammy but eh.

 

You're supposed to tell me!
--- Post automerged ---

The reply thing does matter when you seem to actually be trying to make a reason out of it, one that you even go so far as to call him bucko on and saying you don't believe him on a matter that is quite frankly probably the silliest thing for him to lie on or make up.

The only thing that might be considered somewhat off about his response is that he felt the need to explain something that doesn't need to be explained, which is still kind of eh grasping at straws but could plausibly be something. That wasn't the alert I think I saw while making the one post where I got the alert.

No, I haven't played with you nor have I meta'd you. Being serious right out the gate is one thing, but the way you went about it is odd. Maybe it's a matter of play style, but the people I'm used to seeing be serious out the gate usually aren't tone deaf to obvious jokes and take them like serious posts, but sometimes scum do try to look serious at the start to look like they're doing something at the start and that can come off awkward.

 

Vote Tammy?

 

You're a funny guy!