I just had a stroke seeing that it has in fact been about two years.

 

Are you ok?

 

You good?

 

forgot this existed, i'll catch up soon

 

Ok, I am now 100% sure that Jarizok was scum.
--- Post automerged ---
@Disquieted can you tell me why?

 

I would have no idea mechanically, and I am sick enough to not have the mental power to sit down and figure out why. That’s a literal statement, by the way, I am sick.

Readwise it all fits after dissecting Manasi and tom’s ISOs, but I don’t call mechanical information by the strength of my reads. I wonder if I had said something that hinted towards it but I can’t really think about what I said right now. I woke up this morning and basically shut my brain down upon reading all the mechanical talk.

 

My read is not particularly based on mechanics.

 

Hm.

fluff, genuine question, but are you expecting me to guess?

 

Nah, was just wondering.

Take a look at Jarizok's vote history day 1.

 

Hrk. If you’re waiting for me to do that, I’m eating lunch.

 

He only goes after 1 single person from the start of the day to dayend.

That person happens to be a fellow musketeer.

 

Your point is made, and I would agree it was a good decision to lynch Jarizok. Is this ultimately conclusive that he was a witch, though?

 

Does a town musketeer try to get another musketeer lynched from the start, especially if he doesn't know the third one's alignment?

 

This is a terrible question mainly because I don’t have Witchhunt experience. From my notes that’s exactly what Gemma did, heh. Though I understand the difference in terms of length, Jarizok was locked onto Vaimes from the start.

If I’m following, you’re propositioning that village!Jarizok would not lynch a musketeer immediately mainly on the basis that he would be concerned that, if he thought Gemma could have been a witch, that he could die and give a free kill to me, who is theoretically a witch. And when he started, he did not believe Gemma was strongly village.

Fluff, this sounds good. One question, though. Is it usually worth it for witches to shoot musketeers just for the benefit of a free kill when they have to deal with a gamut or informational roles? Said roles seem to be causing trouble right now.

I guess they don’t have to waste a kill necessarily. Getting into a counterclaim war would work just as well. Is it reasonable for Jarizok to think all of this? I assume so.

Am I following so far? Personally just pointing out that Jarizok was tunnelling on one person is probably reason enough for me, regardless of Vaimes’ musketeer status.

 

I don't actually know if getting the free musketeer kill is worth not priest-hunting, tbh.

I'd think so, but I tend to over-value kills.

 

Did we time warp back to D2 or something?

 

I think as Witch Musketeer you only try to get another Musketeer lynched d1 if you have GD so you can rolekill the other town one. Because protecting the Musketeer that didn't spearhead your lynch is the obvious play.

 

I dunno, how about we talk about the five people in the PoE instead.

M+
fluff
Kai
Dels
shadow

Personally I see no world that M+ or fluff are witches here, M+ because of the deliberate choice of Jarizok over shadow and fluff because tom had been tunnelling him all game.

I have even more trouble with Kai's case when I open up where he posted it and tom is there talking about his preferred lynches, which do not include Jarizok at all. Immediate consideration is that Kai just isn't in chat with tom and hence is not a witch. It's weak.

I have problems with shadow insofar in that I don't really know how shadow decides to actively lynch tom there. There's other things in that I kind of feel like Jarizok pocketed shadow in his last post, but whatever. It's weak-ish and I need to revise shadow considering I did not have the time to read him. I assumed he was mechanically town. Thanks Cobalt.

Meanwhile you guys are talking about oh no one of these people I haven't mentioned can't be a witch when in fact the closest person I feel is likely to be a witch that is not here is actually, Vaimes. But that's not a big deal.

 

I think I'm going with my tried and true "Witches wouldn't have done what they did were I a witch".

 

Why did tom let himself get lynched?

I've talked all this time about how shadow let tom get lynched. But why did tom let tom get himself lynched?
--- Post automerged ---
Huh. Do extra lives protect from lynches?