Vote waco

I don't actually think hes a wolf but i keep thinking hes partnery
:shrug:

 

When I ask you these things, it is more to help you figure them out than to help me figure you out.

 

Hmmm.

Vote Waco

 

This doesn't work for me. I don't read Cuth's early post as "stifling momentum" or anti D1 data. The two main points CUth makes before the vote are commenting on the early Sloth reads, and his thoughts on the Vaimes/Para read/interaction. In both cases, I think he was right, the early Sloth reads were odd since he hadn't done anything largely AI in those early stages. In both cases, it reads to me like he's encouraging discussion, by asking people to evaluate their and others opinions on Sloth/Para, which is far from stifling discussion.

And prior to your vote, there only had the one question to Gemma, considering that was in the opening 185 posts, I'm not sure what elaborated questioning you were looking for.

 

Curious that post did not bother you at all or even warrant addressing until after I voted you.

Kinda comes across as your original question of my Cuth vote was lip service to look engaged and you didn't really care what the answer was.

 

And before you claim oh you just caught up to it I'll say shenanigans to that. The post that doesn't work for you that directly addresses your questions is 270.

You posted in 387 addressing Vaimes 288 and Wisps 358. You can't have missed it...so reads more like you pocketed a fake scum read to use if I came out against you.

 

Waco (5): Rubicon, vaimes, wisp, tom, terr
Wisp (4): Fontisian, Gemma, Waco, Cuthalion
Fluffiness (1): Dels
Vaimes (1): Fluffiness

Abstaining (4): AkinaPuppy, Cobalt, Paratroopa, Sloth


These seem fine to me.

 

Skimming back through the Wiisp section last night, I don't like Vaimes in there at all. He (apologies if wrong pro-noun) makes a lot of posts taking shots at Wiisp (also note the Cuth doubt, and the attempt to divert to missing Akina), but never votes.

Spoiler: Posts mentions

 

Or you ninja'd me while I was reading. And to address your next post, yes I didn't get to it last night. I was being lazy after getting home from work at 1230am, and responded to the easy question that I had a notification from and the thing that stuck out to me.

 

......are you just...going through your wagon poo slinging anyone on it?

 

That's some lovely paranoia though... something you'd like to tell us?

 

Do you think Wisp is town?

 

Waco counterwagon is the most boring thing that could have happened this game.

 

Oddly enough, I'm going back through the game in response to Rubicon's question to me in #285. A post which I was also too lazy to respond to last night

 

More boring than an unopposed runaway wisp wagon?

 

I feel like scum!Vaimes just votes me instead of avoiding me? I don't see the benefit of waffling on me and then not voting me as if somehow that looks really good for wolf!Vaimes?

 

Why am I a wolf?

 

I have him on the scum side of null. Going through his ISO and ignoring his Fontisian interactions, which make little sense to me, I understand where he is on Gemma from his pov. His Dels comment in #392 is bad. His read on me seems pretty self-pres more than anything else.

@Wiisp Can you take me through your Dels read a bit deeper beyond what you have in #392?

 

This might just be theory talk, but like, even if you remind someone that their early reads on Sloth/etc are possibly wrong... what does it, like, get you? The most they'll do is be like "ok i guess its NAI" because i doubt there's a reason to actually reverse the read and find those people scummy. So like... I'm not sure how it can further discussion.

 

What is this post even doing here.