Hey that's improvement at least, right tom.

 

Spoiler

@Dels

 

Sidenote, Jari, why are you like this?

 

Still think im right about that

 

Great. And you're not trying to convince us we're wrong on Cuth because ____?

 

I though jari was scummier than cuth

 

Because it wouldnt do any good
And im not sure enough anyway
And the day just started
And im full of righteous indignation for being pushed for having nonconsensus reads *when the consensus hasnt yeeted any wolves*

 

So were talking about my 5th scummiest person vs my 6th scummiest person in a game with 3 wolves
So im not gonna say i thought about it a great deal or can give a satisfactory answer to this

But interacting with cuth (and hating how reg did so i get he was tunneled but he was like... actively making it unpleasant for him to post it definitely made me more sympathetic), he just didnt feel like he was trying to direct me

I did, in fact, see that jari was vulnerable and thought <at the time of my vote> that he was a better shot
Though still not a great one

 

I'm good, Gemma. Don't worry about the previous post. I just felt I needed to explain to Reg why he was seeing what he was seeing and there was no other way. Thank you.

 

Gemma, it's his post counter. 10 post limit. Or maybe you realized and you're joking =P

 

Reg/vaimes
Gemma
Waco/sloth
Fonti/cuth
Rubi/Cobalt/Dels
Amy

This is nothing new
I dont want to fucking hear that my reads are stagnant when i havent gotten any flips to change anything...
Theyve moved a little

 

Oh, I haven't read anything so I dunno what post you're talking about. Just making small talk.

10 post limit? I guess you're referring to something I haven't read lol.

 

I don't see why you'd switch from your 6th scummiest person to your 5th scummiest person when you all of your scumreads voted for the 5th scummiest person.

 

Oh, is Reg limiting the number of his posts or something. That's so much more boring than rating tom's post a 2/10.

 

Like, let's fill the vote in with these colors:
Vote Count 2.2:
Cuth (7): Gemma, Vaimes, Fontisian, Rubicon, Tom, Regfan, Amy
Jarizok (4): Cobalt, Sloth, Dels, Cuth
Cobalt (1): Jarizok
Tom (1): Waco

With Amy just having swapped from Jari, and her vote really not mattering in getting the yeet (because scum!Amy would assume Jari was going to self pres). How do you possibly look at that with similar eh reads on Cuth and Jari and think "yep, Jari's the more likely wolf here."

Here's another way to illustrate this. Let's assign a number from one to six for each of your reads., one being the scummiest. Jari gets the same value as Cuth, since you said your read on them was pretty similar. I'm putting Amy on the Jari wagon, because that's effectively where she was, and I won't include you in the average. The mean of the Cuth wagon was 4.4, and the mean of the Jari wagon was 2.4. You looked at this and decided to vote with people and entire two tiers scummier to you than the people on the Cuth wagon, and you did it while feeling like the person those scumreads were voting was also town. You can't seriously expect me to believe you're town here.

 

Not a thing i care about as much as you think i should. Ill use it as a reason to justify my gut, but its not enough to override it.

And again. 5th vs 6th with the bottom 4 spread 2-2

 

I didnt look at that wagons and decide that
I looked at cuth and jaris posts over the course of a week and decided that

 

No, they weren't spread 2-2. Amy was voting for Jari and trying to yeet him. She only voted Cuth /when he was already at maj/. There is no way you honestly look at those votes and put Amy down as gunning for Cuth instead of Jari for your worldbuilding.

 

You understand that you have presented no evidence of you actually assessing either of their posts, and you yourself said they were both very close not-quite-scumreads, so I have no reason to believe anything you're saying.

I think I'm done here.

Cuth dies first, you die next.

 

...I actually giggled at this. lol.