Oh wait, I know why you didn't look for connections to Sacrifice! It would have instantly destroyed your case.

 

So it seems like we've won. I'm Town, Fonts seems to be town as well. I really hope that Lungs and Kalas aren't double bluffing us. That leaves Proph, Lexicat (possible vanilla scum, unsure tbh) Ceasar, and Rents. If Lungs or Kalas aren't murdered tonight than the claim may not hold as much credibility :/

---------- Post automerged at 10:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:28 PM ----------

Then***
/filler

 

Bad.. post.. overload

 

Consider my point of view.

I replaced in, haven't read the thread yet (still haven't) and I see a mildly scummy post worthy of a reaction test.

I vote Kalas.

What would you do if you were in my shoes? You'd probably read the thread before posting, but I'm pretty gung-ho about my vote and decided to throw that out there to provoke discussion and such.

---------- Post automerged at 07:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:31 PM ----------

Also, you didn't answer this - you immediately jumped to "read the thread".

Why is my reasoning bad?

 

Bullshit.

Remember Mini Mafia 3, when you replaced in?
https://forums.darklordpotter.net/showpost.php?p=632062&postcount=309
https://forums.darklordpotter.net/showpost.php?p=632078&postcount=311

---------- Post automerged at 09:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:36 PM ----------

You ignored all possible scummy connections to Sacrifice from Lexicat, Rents, Caesar, Lungs and myself to focus on a post by Kalas that fits in with his past behavior.

 

What does that prove?

Do you really think that just because I read the thread in that game before I posted, I'm going to do it for all games I'm going to replace in?

Check your logic. You're using a bad meta example.

 

@Kalas mind telling me whats bad about my post? I'm trying to learn D8

 

Of course I would ignore everything - I haven't even read the thread yet.

It's not Kalas's past behavior, btw - it's Smile's.

 

Proph: You claimed that:

Yet the only other time you replaced in, you took the time to catch up on the thread and write a detailed analysis post. Thus, it really looks like you're trying to cover your ass. The fact that you initially refused to provide any reasoning makes it even worse.

Unvote
Vote Prophylaxis

 

Brb - finishing up work.

Won't be able to respond in the next ~half hour.

Unvote

---------- Post automerged at 07:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:43 PM ----------

...

/10char

---------- Post automerged at 08:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:45 PM ----------

Well, it certainty quieted down.

I'll get up some reads soon.

 

@Proph: I get where you're coming from but 384 and 396 do not gel. At all. And you poked me on brofisting the newly dead player without looking at context?

@Lee: Talk to Lexi if you want general tips. That post in particular though.. Distancing from Lexi and a reads as a poor scumploy to get town to relax and flip this onto me/Lungs if we don't die tonight.

 

I don't see how they don't gel.

And my thought process for the vote was, "Well, Kalas just chimed in here with a post similar to Smile's beginning-of-day posts in Battle School, so here's a vote". I didn't bother to look at context - check the timestamps.

 

You got me. I'm Smile in an Oprah suit.

 

That doesn't explain why you initially refused to give your reasoning.

 

I refused to give my reasoning because I wanted a reaction from Kalas.

 

Because promising a case based on a gut reaction post, without saying so, on a player who you've read exactly one post by is only going to end one way.

---------- Post automerged at 12:56 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:55 AM ----------

And if you had read even the last 50 posts of the Day 2 between when you subbed in and read my post you'd know how dumb it was.

 

Yeah, I'm sure scum!Kalas would have freaked out over one vote without any reasoning.

Frankly, it looked like you had either found something substantial or you had a role that allowed you to determine Kalas's guilt. Now that it's clear neither are true, I'm wondering if you were testing the waters for a fake roleclaim.

 

Where did I say I was providing a case?

And I didn't. Deal with it.

 

Kalas: Are there merits to everyone roleclaiming now that your role and Lung's are out?

 

If we had a cop-cop with a couple unknown town/scum results then I'd say yes. As it stands I'd say no, scum have a much better idea of power roles via game balance and with Lungs' death they could make themselves a decent safety claim.