Witches must be shitting themselves at this point, I can get in on a

lynch: EricF

 

Oh rofl I thought Sesc replaced Zircon.

Rents I would like your thoughts on a game or a t/s list, specifically what changed between:

 

Lynch EricF

Lump no one

Pbpa incoming later on BD. I did not forget.

 

I'll be eager to look at it, given that Bill is kind of like a "?????????" read for me like the end of Firefly.

Rents is a mild scum read for me because he's done absolutely nothing this game, just hop on bandwagons.

 

Day 1 and 2 pbpa Bill Door

Bill Door has 44 posts when I write this.
Day 1

Bill Door enters aggressively. He warns against roleclaiming. Good start.

He is not tolerating excuses for lurking fast. Scum tolerate lurking generally.



Again, smart posting about Judge in 61.

His frustration in 74 and 76 reads genuine.

Bill Door asks an intelligent question of Luckylee in 95.

135 clarifies FoSing intelligently.

145 calls out Wetnurse for lurking. Wetnurse needs to be checked in light of 145 and the stunt he pulled yesterday.

 

I disagree.

61 - let me pull it up:

This post reads as a classic IIoA post (Information Instead of Analysis). It's not "smart posting" at all.

I see how 76 is frustrating but I read it as null - scum and town can be frustrated. 74 doesn't feel like frustrated at all.

I also don't see how 95 reads as a intelligent question. It doesn't read to me that he's trying to get insight into Lucky's alignment - it reads more of a coaching/teaching opportunity.

I see #135 as talking about Aekiel, not about FoSing.

I agree on #145, but I would love for you to clarify those opposing points.

 

167 refuses to jump gun on townreads.Good play here. Scum would appease.

176 admits weak case on Rubi. Scum don't do this unless the lynch looks unlikely.

384 encourages calm raional play. Protown.

389, encourages discussion.



I cannot see anything scummy here. So Bill Door is obvtown.

---------- Post automerged at 07:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:21 PM ----------

Not to me. It reads as someone unifying and trying to get people on board to work together and not rely onsomeone else, which is a common theme in BD's posting.

Together 74 and 76 read frustrated town to me. Just going to disagree there.

95 would have taken place in a qt if coaching. I routinely use similar questions to get in heads of players.

135 was asked to clarify the fos on A. He did well.

"Opposing points"? Confused.

 

I agree on this.

This reads as null for me. Scum can have gut reads too.

I see 384 as null - it's not townie because it offers no analysis.

389 is just a summation of his scum reads.

This is a bad PBPA. Are you running the Sarevok play again?

 

Lol. No. I am playing BG though. Try Minscish...

The PBPA is fine. I went through his posts, detailed my thoughts.

---------- Post automerged at 07:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:33 PM ----------

What did you mean by opposing points?

 

The points I raised opposing yours.

Rebutting your #507, now.

 

Precult obviously

 

Eh, can you guys stop speaking in inside jokes and references that no one else understands? Gets kinda annoying.

 

Let's agree to disagree here.

Let's pull up Tarhalindur's Classic Scum Tells (pleasant man, I've played with him in a few games):

It can also extend to providing definitions and being helpful without analyzing or doing anything to Make Things Happen.

Bill Door just mostly states /why/ relying on a Judge lynch is bad, and explains a basic analysis of the Judge role. This is not behavioral analysis, this is not accusing others - just talking about the setup. That is IIoA to me, and it's a reliable scumtell.

Can you explain to me how

is frustration? It reads to me as clarification.

How would it have took place in a quicktopic if scum!Bill Door was explaining to town!Luckylee?

Remember "D"?

(thanks for clarifying to me)

 

Everything seems to happen while I'm asleep or away....

Anyway, thing with Fonti has very obviously made me reconsider some things, vague as my opinions are. I'm kind of sleepy, so I'm going to refrain from saying anything right now, because I'll either misconstrue myself or ramble. (More than i already do)

 

@Bill Door

Can you give your thoughts on the following players?

blab
Rents/Zircon
Wetnurse
Prophylaxis

 

BD was analyzing the best actions for the judge and encouraging actions in that manner. This is appropriate to me. Look at Eric's info. That did nothing and encouraged apathy.

Yup. That reads as frustration.

If it is not a scum scum action, then it isn't coaching. Scum do not coach town.

D as in Damus? Relevance?

---------- Post automerged at 07:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:49 PM ----------

Will do. I was trying to communicate with that to where no one else would get it.

---------- Post automerged at 07:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:50 PM ----------

In light of no nightkill, and this should be obvious, I received no notice of survival.

 

It still reads as IIoA to me. We'll see.

I'm not sure why. Can other players check in on this?

I don't want to argue about semantics, but I don't think it's a townie question. Townies ask questions to figure out the gamestate, scum ask questions to appear town.

Dagaen.

(okay, Bill Door, I'll stop.)

Also, other players can chime in on that group of players once Bill has answered.

 

That question did not appear to be "appearing town" but getting into player's head. I have a similar style. I've asked quite a few.

In fact, you're doing the whole reads list thing that first annoyed me with Eric. I don't like it.

 

Okay.

Can you tell me /why/ I chose those players? Those players weren't picked up randomly.

 

No. I'm not psychic I don't know why. If youu are town, you picked the players you feel reads would give you the best information. If you're scum, you are making content while trying to figure out who to kill, much like Eric did presumably.