I was just protected. Thats why I need Ollie to fucking answer my question. Either he is the clown and he hit scum, or he's scum. I kinda accepted that I might have to claim due to my shenanigans with Fonti, but I'm still annoyed :/

 

Mmkay so

you're claiming SC

and you presumably shared with someone-who-is-not-Zircon last night,

so he must be the clown OR he was not actually protected

 

Yep. Thats why I jumped on him for a reply :/

 

I'm not in a good state of condition to play mafia.

Expect me to contribute sometime tomorrow.

 

well, my brain is tired as fuck but that logic looks sound to me. I guess we're in a holding pattern until he decides to join us again. which hopefully won't be day 5.

If he claims clown, we should lynch whoever he targeted.

he probably would not claim clown w/ a target if he's scum in this scenario

---------- Post automerged at 10:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:18 PM ----------

Titus when you get back in here please let me know why you wanted to force a claim out of luckylee, kthx

 

Well, given everything you said day 2 it was pretty obvious that you were either SC or scum.

Anyway I can't see any downside to Rents claiming if he is the clown or not.

@Rents: If you claim clown, to prove that, tell me who you targeted night 2.

 

I am dealing with a major work project. So my posting will be slower.

Forcing a claim from a scum suspect only works if we suspect they are the last scum. That would be the case if Ruckyree was scum. We would get a 1 v 1 scenario at worst with far too many town to be souped.

 

Okay, while we wait for Zircon we can still talk about possible other scum. What are people's thoughts on Wetnurse, Sesc, blab and Rubicon?

 

I like a BD, Titus, Sesc, Ruckyree blab townbloc. Out of those blab is the weakest read.

Zircon should announce who he pied.

Unvote Ruckyree

I don't see anyone ccing Rucky atm.

 

@Bill Door
While we're talking about other people's scum suspects, how do you think of Titus as scum?

 

Come on guys, we're still playing this game.

---------- Post automerged at 01:32 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:32 AM ----------

oh wtf ninjas

---------- Post automerged at 01:33 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:32 AM ----------

Titus is a strong town read.

 

What makes you think so?

---------- Post automerged at 09:35 ---------- Previous post was at 09:35 ----------

Btw, I'm asking this because Titus is my biggest scum-read.

 

Because everything he has done has been pro-town so far. What makes you think that?

 

I'm reaaaaaally interested in why Sesc/Ollie simply vanished.

 

His behavior during near end of D2 and his Lump votes.

I'll try to patch up what I have compiled so far of what I found odd about Titus.

 

I am odd Wetnurse. Those actions are deliberate. Glad you noticed.

 

I can confirm that Titus is a bit odd.

 

To start off, let me say that Titus wanted a no-lynch at end of Day 2.

Titus#456

Now this is a dangerous proposition. What if font wasn't the Judge? What if the judge was offline (considering that font was at hard-lynch)? What I'm trying to get at is that Titus was confident that the judge would pull off the judge-lynch in the case that a tie or a no-lynch occured.

If you doubt me on this, here is Titus#557

Here, he is certain that a judge-lynch would have occurred. With that, it wouldn't have to be a leap in logic to assume that Titus was the Judge. I would have easily bought that.

But then it got brought up that Titus Lump voted every day. Her reply to that was

Titus#648

When I checked her lump votes the results were :

D2 - Bill Door
D3 - No One
D4 - Sesc

I had to ask why those targets? Also, why no Lump on Day 3? If she were a role that could target other players, then it would have to be a role that could only target other players on alternate nights. The easy conclusion would be SpiritCaller. N1 SpiritCaller would get Angel protection on N1 and share it with someone else. N2 SpiritCaller wouldn't get Angel protection so no target. N3, she gets Angel protection again and get to share it.

My conclusion here is that Titus was laying the groundwork for an SC claim, while also keeping a Judge fallback claim.

 

Should I be glad you can confirm that or sad that you can agree I am a little nuts after only playing a game or two with me?

Of course, that was a pretty epic almost victory.

---------- Post automerged at 07:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:25 PM ----------

Neither. I am not answering that. I'm neither the judge nor the SC. That is important though. Just use your noggin Wetnurse. Look through my other posts, you'll see the answer and then smack yourself.

I was confident a judge lynch would happen on EricF given the voting pattern.

---------- Post automerged at 07:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:27 PM ----------

Knock off the guessing please Wetnurse. When you have the answer, it wil be unambiguous. If I keep denying roles, I might get souped by PoE.

 

@Wetnurse

Why do you keep calling Titus scum and not voting her?