Eh, it's not like godfather is really a role that needs much thinking about or discussion. It's just something that's there.

 

Remind me of this:

Lynch it.

 

I have no idea what point you're trying to make with that post.

 

You're arguing against the premise (i.e. scum would be thinking about the godfather role) rather than having a town reaction (i.e. I'm town and it was a normal mistake. Why are Rubicon and fontisian pushing this?).

 

So you think town should be going omgus at you because that's what town players do??

 

I'd expect town to address the arguments against the governor plan and to draw conclusions from or ask clarifications of Rubicon's and my own pressure, not weakly poke at the scumslip argument. Your post was so safe that it's obvious you don't want a confrontation.

 

Yup, and that's why your response not a town response. It was a stupid question - but not because the only reason for you to vote Bill is if you think he slipped about being Godfather. That's obviously not true, and you should know it. It's a stupid question because you already answered it earlier on the page.

You not mentioning that and saying something completely different (and strange) in response is what I'd expect someone to do if they actually didn't think Bill slipped and wanted to hide the fact. So, FoS @ you.

Do you still think the Governor should claim? You dropped the topic pretty fast when fontisian and I started voting you.

 

Wait, what. That was the only reason I was voting for Bill at the time (the key words there being "for Bill" because there are plently of general reasons to vote).

 

I think they should if we mislynch day 1, and don't have a successful cop check, because their role doesn't really add that much then. We can only get away with 1 mislynch this game so townfirms are our strongest asset at that point.

 

Yo.
/filler

 

Yo, Rucky. Why didn't you cast a vote? You voted in your first post in the last game.

Still FoS'ing you, font.

One thing I'd like to point out is that the Governor cannot overturn a lynch on his/herself like your first post said.

Does anyone who's posted so far strike you as suspicious?

 

Where does it say that? But anyway, the only reason to lynch the claimant was for proof but if there are counterclaims then we can vote to lynch a random person and get the governor to redirect it to the fake claimer.

Fonti seems meh, you seem meh, Lucky is nonexistent.

 

Prophylaxis said it in the signup thread. Also.

That's a lot of meh.

 

This game has been a lot of meh so far.

 

Prophylaxis, if you're lurking about please check your PMs, I sent you a pretty important one.

 

Bill Door is scum, because he wants to instalynch me on day one. Not putting a vote down though, so that some idiot can't come in and accidentally hammer.

fontisian and rubicon jerking each other off is a thing, though jury is still out on what.

 

No one ever is.

I think Bill may be town, just because I'm not sure he'd risk pushing for a major town role to claim if he were scum?

On the other hand, his responses are iffy at best.

also I don't think we need to worry about quickhammering in this game, for a bunch of reasons

 

True. However, I think a govenor claim during Day 3 lylo would be the best case scenario short of us lynching correctly on both days.

Do you have any non-bs reasoning?

Any thoughts on the scumslip, Kai?

So, why are you still voting for him?

 

Prophylaxis hasn't sent me a role yet so I'm not sure if I should be voting scum or town

 

:/

Seriously. How am I supposed to figure out if you're scum if you don't even know?