Read the first post again. All players have that ability.

Immediately upon Fonti's death, her gold is distributed to all she mentioned in her qt.

 

Building on that particular point is my thought process. Unless someone can point to a post and quote that says that every one in thread knows Last Will activated when Fonti died, which it wouldn't since Last Will is anonymous, then there's still a chance you three are lying to cover your scumminess.

 

You could argue Fonti is the dumbest player in the game, but that we made it up is farcical.

 

You don't make sense riley.

Such a ploy would work only when your scumteam is reasonably sure that fontisian isn't actually giving gold away, i.e. if they had a gold cop, which is what you are claiming.

 

The whole point of my obvious irritation (to those in town not chiming in) is that, even though it's a rapid action (which has no bearing on what I'm saying really) it's an anonymous action and that means that only those who received the gold can know for sure they received gold until they state it in thread. It doesn't matter what Fonti did or didn't do, it only matters what you're claiming she did.

---------- Post automerged at 04:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:32 PM ----------

Or you know, that Fonti never made a Last Will blab.

---------- Post automerged at 04:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:33 PM ----------

Whatever, I'm done arguing.

Lynch Ika Lynch me after if you want.

 

There. The first post.

 

i don't think you understood what I wrote but I'm too tired to keep on trying formulating this stuff.
My point: Basically this ploy that you are suggesting does not make sense at all for scum.

tl:dr the last 4 pages:

Riley is derp

 

Dat rage...

 

@Rubicon: What are your current reads on Riley?

@everyone: what is the vote at right now? Ika has at least 2 or 3 votes, I think. Otherwise, that's it, right?

 

I am going for Ird and Riley as my vig shots now. Custer is also acceptable.

 

Riley is derping about the last will mechanism, but honestly it screams townderp to me, I'm not convinced that he's scum. I still would like to hear from him why I SHOULDN"T jail Titus in his mind, and if not titus, who?

 

Seriously, stop that. If you're town, like you say you are, then be a team player. In my eyes, you've gotten more towncred by revealing your role, and thereby revealing information. For now, I trust you. I don't think you are going to get lynched. To me, Custer and Blab are bigger targets than you.

Hell, I'm still weary of Titus too; she's not conftown to me in the slightest. As of now, I have a nullread, and I'm not sure if I'll ever get a townread on her, because a scum with 2 votes is just fucking scary.

---------- Post automerged at 03:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:44 PM ----------

I vote Custer and blab for the vig shots, and

Lynch vote Ika

 

@Zennith, town would know how the last will mechanic works as we may be faced with it.

@Maiden, 5votes on ika

Ika, me, me, Citrus, Riley

 

Titus should tot double vote herself.

---------- Post automerged at 03:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:45 PM ----------

unvote

vote Prophylaxis

 

VC of ika

Me, Me, Lucky, Citrus, Riley, Maiden

I forgot Lucky the last time.

 

Does anyone else think it's suspicious that Lucky told us to basically decide who he'd vigshoot, and now he's gone for the day? I understand that we all have lives outside of this game, but the timing of that seems weird--like he did it to derail us. Not that it matters, I guess, since his NAs will reflect his allegiance to us or the scum.

 

Baker Vote: Riley

I don't like ika at L minus 2 until Rubi finishes his notes.

 

The fact that the OP says "eliminate all threats" most likely means that there is a third party in this game. (At least as far as I can tell.) We have to focus on finding scum, but we still need to figure out who's playing for themselves too.
My guesses are for Titus, Lucky, and MAYBE Ika.

 

vote ika

titus use your other vote to hammer me when the time comes.

 

Then why isn't the 3rd party's wincon in the opening post?

---------- Post automerged at 01:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:54 PM ----------

No. Just in case you are a supersaint.