If you're looking for 'sureness', I would literally bet this entire game and any right I have to say I can read fontisian on her being scum.

 

The reward for your vote is survival. Help us lynch scum and we won't lynch you.

 

Don't accuse my RL of being fake. *glares angrily* I still got my vote in before hammer would have happened if not enough votes. Accusing RL fake ain't cool dude.

 

For God's sake Zenzao, stop voting your town reads, especially when they're not even a top wagon 45 minutes before deadline.

 

In your last town game with me, you said you didn't think you could read me. This bravado is bullshit.

 

What a useless threat. No one agrees on shit. :/ sooo guess that means you want to lynch me tomorrow.

I provided a fucking guilty and followed it up and others have posted about her weird play too...Like wtf. I am helping I provided how no one died and a scum.

 

Have you not been reading his posts? He's not trying to solve the game. He sided with Titus when she was being scummy as fuck because he knew she would flip town and support anyone who helped her at the same time, but he didn't actually give reasons for his town read, because he really wanted us to lynch her. Then he pushed me, again with no reasons, because it benefits him to have everyone doubt my reads and it looks good to challenge the heavy weights.

 

@Sloth: ika has said he'll 'deal' with Titus tonight. I'm taking that as a declaration, if nothing changes wrt Titus or ika I'll consider ika at the very least conf!scum. For now put your personal feelings aside and, considering irl for Aekiel at the time, take him simply as fresh eyes.

 

Despite my lack of confidence, I did read you correctly and would have stuck with my analysis of your mindset if you hadn't fake claimed Priest.

And, you know. You have basically scum claimed to me about a dozen times by now in ways that I pick up on because I know you. There's ambiguity when you're town, because of 'you could be fooling me' paranoia. There's not much ambiguity here.

 

No, Math. While you are helping town, I don't want to lynch you. If you starting siding with scum by going after me now, that'll change.

 

Right, just dug back through and found your post. Sorry.

Apparently not closely enough. New guy in a bastard game, ma'am.

 

I am not going after you. I don't think you are scum.
There is not enough there to lynch you. So I get free shinies to help later by meeting Rubicon's request and we lynch Titus or NL.

Best of all worlds and I turn out better for it and no harm to town.

 

Rubicon is not explaining his reads. What did you say? He explained his reads in detail? No, I can't hear you. Those posts don't exist. Rubicon is not explaining his reads. Repeat ad nauseum.

 

Right. I'm sure you can provide reasons for those ways instead of throwing out shit. Again.

The thing is, the only thing you have accused me off (having shitty reasons) is in reality true of you. I know you're not blind enough to not see that. You actually fucking argued that reacting instead of reading the thread is pro town of Sloth yesterday. You can't honestly expect me to believe that you hold that opinion.

 

Your town read on me based on meta then steadily dropping to null to scummy, with near zero posts on my end?

 

You. Haven't. Explained. Your. Reads.

The exception is when you are called on it (see: Sloth) and then your reason turn out to be horrible. Every time. Quote something to prove me wrong. I dare you.

 

DEL OR LEXI VOTE COUNT?

 

Vote Count

[3] fontisian ~ Rubicon, blab, MathBlade
[5] Titus ~ Sloth, Luckylee, Lyrium, TerRaine, SnowVon
[2] Lyrium ~ Kalas, Titus
[3] Rubicon ~ fontisian, Ika, Zenzao

[2] Not Voting ~ Atum, Doctor Whooves,

 

Yes, Rubicon is not explaining his reads. I agree. You said it more emphatically this time, that made me realize my error.

Anyway.

Are people going to vote fontisian or should I vote the mason?

 

Del and Lexi aren't online. Tbh I think no lynch is über likely.