Uh, are you talking to me? If so, correct, and also explained.

 

IMO vote Titus please. But that is the only way we get a lynch today I think.

 

Wow. Rubicon completely convinced me with his defensive sarcasm, as he has done every time before. Good thing he can fall back on that when he has not zero evidence to support his position.

Caught scum is caught.

Zenzao: Thank you.

Kalas, Titus and Atum: Put your votes somewhere useful.

 

Someone please fucking shoot me tonight.

 

Yes. Let's not kid ourselves. It was "Kalas and fonti have been on opposite sides of issues, therefore they are scummates." And you accused me of having simplistic reads.

 

Then could you stop being stubborn and quote it please? As it directly answer's fonti.

 

fonti I don't follow your Rubicon case so...yeah

 

Same could be said of you of having a vote in a useless place. Looks like Titus or NL.

 

Why the fuck not?

---------- Post automerged at 01:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:30 PM ----------

I've reached the point where I've given up on you people ever learning how to read.

Rubicon, Kalas, Sloth, Doctor Whooves.


Lynch in there or ignore me and lose.

 

https://forums.darklordpotter.net/showpost.php?p=760057&postcount=1923

It's a wagon dynamics theory that no one has engaged with me over. If you're town I'm interested in your take on it though.

All of my posts directly answer fonti because fonti's posts have no basis in reality, because she is deliberately pushing a false narrative.

 

...This one posts makes me totally ok lynching Fonti. WTF.
I defended you, so vote where I want you to.

---------- Post automerged at 12:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:37 PM ----------

Nope, things were lining up quite well to a Titus lynch before that point. We may have gone back to that, but unsure.

 

We can make it happen! We only need like, five votes in 22 minutes.

 

I think the better question is why are your votes so easy to change with minimal as hell pressure.

 

I don't care what you think you were doing. If someone says you're lying and this proves you're scum and you weren't you post your proof. You don't wave it off. Doing that is the same thing you're accusing fonti of which gets us NOWHERE.

 

Sloth isn't reading the thread.

Mathblade is specifically asking what people are doing for her before she votes, because she's a third party. I'm pointing out the reality that she lives or dies by the good will of the town. Again, you would know that if you bothered to read.

 

So I did explain my read and you just retroactively disagree with it. Wonderful.

 

It is, but you gotta admit there's something to be said about putting it all on the line like that.
What the hell are you doing aside from throwing a quasi-tantrum and not really doing anything to make people back you up (aside form Zen, who backs up anyone that looks at him funny)

 

....sooo....exactly what Titus had been doing over and over again?

 

Kalas... are you just skimming my interactions with fontisian? I've done exactly this over and over again. At some point I expect people to just follow the ball and pick up on the pattern.

 

Things were sitting at 3/3/2/1. I voted, unvoted, waffled, laid a vote on Fonti, then Snowvon voted, waffled, revoted for (Fonti IIRC). 5/3/2/1. Then Titus told me to vote you or Rubicon rather than Fonti. Ika showed up, voted Rubicon. I unvoted, putting us at 4/3/2/2.