I'm actually here. I just finished my supper and just got to this post.

 

Any thoughts on Sloth's flip or the discussion since?

 

I'm gonna go through your posts, Q. Gimme a minute or 50.

I dunno, I thought the fuzzy Q fit you nicely. ,_,

---------- Post automerged at 17:05 ---------- Previous post was at 17:03 ----------

In exchange, you should take a stab at my alignment. I'm curious.

Or rather Qrious. (Yes? No? Bad?)

 

Eh, you haven't really been around when I'm around Snow, but I guess we'll see. Plus, you're maybe scum, but I'm mostly depending on others and early bad feelings about your posts for that read.

Not caught up yet, still have ~150 posts to go, but I skipped to the end to see where the game state is and toss in my reads to maybe get us moving somewhere useful.

I like Titus/Snow/Fluffs +1 (maybe one of the Q's) for the scum team. Mathblade seems like a decent Riddler candidate. Explanations for all but Riddler later.

Of the above, in order of sureness {Titus, Fluff, Q's, Math, Snow}

 

Oh right, Ter thinks Lyrium is the Riddler.

Ter, do you have any other strong scum reads?

---------- Post automerged at 02:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:13 PM ----------

ATUM
why do you only show post when you name is mentioned

---------- Post automerged at 02:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:14 PM ----------

there are no typos in the preceding sentence

 

Explain why you think Quank is not scum. Seriously. :/

 

Since when do we have to be on at the same time to have a party? This isn't IRC.

Are you calling me scum because I called you scum? Did I hurt your villainous feelings? Who are you depending on? I think they're a bad influence.

 

Too many questions!

@Rubi: Coincidence. Or maybe I have a sixth sense for mafia.

@MB: I didn't say Quank wasn't scum Q's = Quank & QQ^2

@Snowvon: I'm calling you scum because I thought there was something off with your posts early D1, nothing really changed my mind, but I was focused on fluffy D1 and later Quank because I was more sure and thought the chances of getting a lynch were better.

Why are you really calling me scum?

---------- Post automerged at 16:32 ---------- Previous post was at 16:31 ----------

Oh and I guess I wasn't really in a party mood earlier. IRC sounds like fun though, we should do that.

 

I calls em as I sees em.

Maybe you should catch up before you make such a hasty decision.

 

Lets see.
Firstly mechanics wise, we don't have another set of eyes to look over Batman's logs. We don't have the only role that could strike back against scum (Black Canary).

Player wise,
-I'm glad that certain arguments are being put to the side.
-I forgive Snowvon for ignoring me.
-It would be pertinent to try to get all questions asked to TerRaine asked by around mid-late friday.
-I still can't understand Quanksor.
-I can't quite follow the train of thought for why Mathblade is aggroing Snowvon.

I'm not sure if we may freely discuss role/faction answers here, but if we may I still want to know some of the questions we never have had answers to yet like if scum have a day-chat, or if oracle can protect Black Canary's killer. Need to go back and read about crumbs as well.

@Lyruim #1068 Understood.

 

@TerRaine, it is good not great. I just wannted to see if I could run onby and figure some superhero designs but if you are home you have amnesia.

@Mathblade, So you have seen the Flash. Bah! I thought you had not. First I cannot crumb yo Mala. Now you take my tv crumbs.

@Rubicon, I think TerRaine is saying Lyrium is groupscum.

@Atum, you've missed a goodchunk of my posts so is your read based in my prior slit's lack of posting or me? If so why?

@All, I highly doubt Quak is scum but just ml bait.

 

Titus is scum because #991 reminds me of her scum game during Witch Hunt, and her confusion if I'm correct is due to having access to the game thread and scum qt, but not being able to interact with her new team. She encourages discussion of role interactions, not scummy by necessity, but definitely helps scum. #999 and #1009 put scum on Lyrium's trail, role-wise and are bad. She uses the roles to encourage pointless speculation about possible roleblocker or redirecter interactions. #1029 may be to purposefully show 'lack of knowledge' of scum daychat.

 

Vote Titus

This is symbolic. Titus would just crumb. Not try to put it in a way I would or would not understand it. Titus IMO is Two Face and I am on borrowed time.

Vote Quanksor

---------- Post automerged at 14:43 ---------- Previous post was at 14:41 ----------

Atum -- Are you scum? Mods specifically said no comment when I asked about it in my QT and did not comment here when Lyrium asked.

Vote Atum

Another symbolic vote

Vote Quanksor

So if Snowvon is not scum then Titus/Atum/Quanksor team with one TBD and Riddler TBD?

 

@Titus: It's pretty unusual that I come up with something that pings someone as scum in their first few posts, but with yours it was almost hard to ignore. The fact that your slot got those replacements and netiher of them had any content that struck me as solidly town off the top of my head is really just icing on the scumcake.

 

So from my understanding to crumb (crumbing? to leave crumbs?) is to leave behind small details or information. Correct?

@ Snowvon

No. You should have gone with Querious.

Also, I am here at the moment and wish to know if your sorting process is a active or passive one.

 

Yes it's to leave a hint as to your role so when pressured and/or flip in a bastard game people see what role you were and then go back and analyze accordingly.

 

@MB: I have no idea what prompted your question but no. I know the mod response in regard to the daychat question, I'm more concerned with whether bringing it up came from a town or scum mindset. I see either as possible and for now I'm going with the interpretation that supports my other observations.

Do you have a case as to why I am scum?

 

Pertaining to your role, yes.

Fuck.

It's pretty passive. Sometimes I go on the offensive, but it usually just ends in bruises.

What are your reads on Atum , Riley, Mala, and Q, He Who Shits on Gestures of Friendship?

 

For starters your 1029 grammatically implies that you KNOW the answer to whether scum has daychat rather than me who got a NO COMMENT. This implies that you are in league with Titus and if you are in league with her that you'd get town cred for pushing her lynch.

Secondly the showposting Snowvon mentioned

Thirdly - When you do post you don't seem to have any weighty opinions. When I replace in and/or catch up after an absence I be sure to let people know where I stand on things. In AWAY2 you made sure to post long ass walls when pressured and got really annoyed when I started tunnelling you. Here's it's all "Do you have a case?" Very non-chalant.

 

Lol. Nope. I am not letting you know wjat I know sis since I am 75% sure you are the riddler.

---------- Post automerged at 03:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:59 PM ----------

Addressing this from home. Cannot answer till then.