So I think your clever enough to know the power of suggestion.

It works in this game, you stated I was Riddler someone else started bleating it too. You put Penguin there right under a long waal about me(and yes that entire post that you made about me is basically nonsense and has not an iota of good reading of me...its so reaching that the dialogue I wrote is how I feel I can interpret that).

If anyone other than you wants me to do a point by point response to that, I would but the idea that I was setting up Sloth for a mislynch. Well either I'm a bad player or I am so slick that I got Sloth lynched. Can't be both. Also the idea that I set up Sloth for a mislynch is laughable. If anythign I was going for a No Lynch because I wasn't sure of either top wagon for different reasons but Sloth being his usual "Lyrium isn't being an adult" pushed me over.

I'm not sure what your last point meant because as you stated its not about me? I mean its clear I am your number one pressure and not for reasons that are to this game but for reasons stemming from a previous game. Malice is when a person tries to be play a manipulative game, in your own words you are Slytherin and I believe that you hold those qualities even if you can't even get me lynched.

Why aren't you pressuring players who are coasting? I obviously amn't coasting or do you see me coasting?

You aren't scum hunting you are Lyrium!hunting to a degree that is not making sense. Oh yes, you added that bit about Snow and Quank and fluffy but meh..not seeing much strong there except for Quank who everyone agrees is being bizarre.

In fact, to responding to RIley I would rather be up for Quank's lynch or him actually putting his words to his actions.

So TerRaine I see your read of me as well I would use Titus's terminology but that might be too much so Nonsense.

 

Right. That's an info lynch which you said like three times.

Lynching Math would actually be but it is pretty clear that we are not lynching Math because we are playing risk averse so hey.

 

Already did note Rubicon pointing it out and left a shocked trail of dots. So far he seems to be the only one who doesn't think you are scum which after you outright claiming I wonder what it would take. For saying you'd read the thread, you need to ya know, read the thread. :facepalm


@Riley -- Yes. My death will explain a lot to peeps if they don't already know. Would rather it occur later as it explains more but most of that kill drama was to expose Titus as scum since she was scum claiming. Someone else caught one of her slips and so posting like that worked.

I prefer Donkey Kong to a bunny. Much more fierce and smashy smashy.

@Terraine --

For the love of all that is good in this world can you PLEASE stop for a second here? Lyrium is NOT scum. She is clearly running a gambit as established yesterday. Why the hell are you still trying to paint her as scummy when there is claimed scum you so far are not voting for?

Explain to me why your vote is not on Titus.

 

Oh and let's use Titus's logic, TerRaine. If you had to readjust your worldview so that I was definitely town...how would that change your reads?

WHere is the connective tissue between your reads on Snowvon, fluffy, Quanksor, and Lyrium?

 

Riley say who you actuallythink is scum.

 

Holy crap this game blew up since I last posted. Catching up now(on page 58 right now).

 

@Mathblade, Explain to me why you feel entitledto have everyone vote me. Using your logic, why is yourvote not on Lyrium? Why did you change to me after failing to lynch Quank?

 

...So you're entire argument that I'm scum is that town is risk averse?
Hello I'm deducing breaking shit open figuring out the game.
They're not risk averse they'd just rather lynch claimed scum.

---------- Post automerged at 09:16 ---------- Previous post was at 09:13 ----------

I am entitled to ask everyone to vote you because you claimed scum. I 1v1'd you and you never fixed your mistake until someone explicitly points it out and you make up it's a joke.

Apparently you don't understand my logic. Claimed scum is always lynched first over gambits. Always.

I changed to you because you were scum and the reasons were posted previously. It wasn't a failure to lynch Quanksor. I mentioned in the thread I was reevaluating my read on you and you continued to be scummy so I voted you. You then scum claimed so I'm vote parking.

 

No. My argument that you are not town is due to multi claim vague unfounded assertions and not having unique thoughts.

We are not lynching you bc risk averse. Stop spinning Math.

Yeah no one things I seriously claimed scum.

 

MathBlade, I want TerRaine to commit to her words. I will self-lynch if when I flip town she gives her role to THe Riddler.

I mean you said it, why not go through with it? Like if that's how strongly you feel then please commit to it. I'm all in.

phoenixes rise

---------- Post automerged at 12:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:16 PM ----------

Also MB, can you point to where TItus claimed as scum bc I didn't read that the way you did?

---------- Post automerged at 12:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:17 PM ----------

Like I saw the wall post where she put Nemrut as scum but that would be a hell of a risk? I mean its possible but unless there's somethign else youre seeing, like idk?

 

You don't even read what I post do you? you just see your name skim and spiral. You had not begun any of that by post 200.

You got all in a tizzy over me calling one play in one game luck and a fluke...yet here you are doing to same thing to Sloth who is accepted as good player and is town firmed all because you say

That's ridiculous because you're not perfect. No one in this game is. If we all stopped looking at the reads of and listening to people who were wrong on one read we'd get no where.

So you base your reads and gameplay on personal grudges now?

Which is towny…but you’re using it selectively and ignoring that there are players in this game that have not played with everyone in this game. How can they knowingly target players not known for being elite if they have no meta with them?

Quank isn’t a newbie to mafia…this point was irrelevant when you bought it up when I was pushing a lynch on quank and its irrelevant now.

Unless they’re you in which case you claim malicious intent

see above. Seriously….this is nonsense. I tunneled you and you spazzed, counter tunneled, named called, and then complained to Kalas that I was making comments that eluded to something awful which wasn’t the case. I explained the truth to him and backed off out of respect to him and his game and because if you were THAT unprepared to handle a tunnel…and you come back to tell people how malicious I am.

Don’t tell me that this is a town tell for you because if it is you are NOT showing it here.

We agree here so not sure why you bring it up as a counter argument to declare me scum

Again this is selective. Yes the group does expect you to be civil.

 

I would rather lynch scum than town. If I absolutely have to I will hammer you but you are town Lyrium. The other problem is I think Terraine is town and I would really rather not create Riddler bait for your gambit.

*sigh*

You didn't read her saying she would regret killing me? *blinks* If you think someone is town you don't want to kill them. But she would regret killing me Lyrium. I'll get the posts that made me flip later on when the thread is slower but I don't know how much good this will do since the most obvious one is pointed out.

 

On my way home read in an hour.

 

Yes. Titus can't lie very well. So then rather she put she was town which would be a lie she openly said she was scum. And oh look now that you've said it another joke.

That post reads like something that should have been posted in a mafia chat and then groomed for sanity.

 

But from I did see, if I am wrong, I would lynch the cop. Too risky imo. Need to investigate.

 

@Titus -- Stop saying no one believes that. You have a significant wagon of people who do.

I can hammer Lyrium if it comes down to it for her gambit but I'd rather have you here and now.

@Lyrium -- FYI No lynch D1 makes sense now hun.

 

If you think Lyrium's post shoulda been groomed, that's inconsistent with your unexplained town read on Lyrium.

---------- Post automerged at 09:30 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:28 AM ----------

No you don't hammer town reads as townMath. But u ain't town.

I am wagoned bc I cracked half the roles and explaining was anti town plus defending obvtown Quank. you couldn't shop Quank.

 

Got it -- No unique thoughts when I catch you claim scum and uniquely vote you first and tunnel you. Apparently this doesn't qualify as "unique".

And you're entire argument is risk averse and you think I'm the cop.

Man this gives me flash backs to Fantasy Strike. Maybe I should say I'm not every role in the game

 

You choose to interpret everything in the most negative light, TerRaine. Also I think that you'r really good at alluding to things but not saying them outright which is great for you because it leads to a lot of "Oh gee golly whizz, I was just playing the game and could never have meant that." I feel emotions and the ones from you aren't just what you say they are.

If I held grudges I woudn't have been happy with Titus getting back in the game. If anything you seem to be hyperfocused on my play last game whcih was towny to the deteriment of all else so that everything I say and do is scummy even though based on your arguments I'm doing the same thing I did last game.

As for civility, its up to interpretation. Different people define civility in different ways. In our society stealing millions from the middle class is considered a "stay in a fancy jail" crime while other less devious things get people shot. So therefore, my belief is that everything I said to you in this game was valid because I feel something from you that I never felt when Titus or even other players were focusing on me.

I'm not sure how my view of Sloth is even relevant here. If I were scum how would harping on it help me? How does my view of Sloth even matter in the game? Like Sloth is dead, good for him.

You won't answer the question, you stated earlier on that you were willing to give up your role to the Riddler if it meant my lynch. Can you be true to that?

 

You keep claiming that i called you a bad player....it didn't happen. I called one play weak. Why do you think you defined by one play?

I've given reasons that are in this game. All of my reasons in fact. My read on you has nothing to do with previous hames.

You freely admit yours does though.

You don't get to make up definitions to words. Malice is the intention or desire to do evil; ill will. in the context of your post you talked about how only someone with malicious intent would tunnel you this bad when they saw how upset and stressed you were last game.

It's not malicious or evil and I dont bare you ill will. I am playing the game.

No you're not coasting. Hence the post isn't about you.

I've also posted several starting game reads on Fluff and Quank and bitched at Riley in a few posts to get in here. It doesn't fit your narrative so you ignore it.