Vote Count:

Malakittens (5) - his fluffiness, Sloth, Atum, TerRaine, Luckylee,
Luckylee (5) - Malakittens, fontisian, Citrus, Rubicon, Snowyvon
Snowvon (1) - The Waco Kid

Not Voting (1) - Mathblade

Previous Vote Count

Roughly 1 and a quarter hours remaining.]

 

The Waco Kid
Citrus
ika/Rubicon
Sloth
Fontisian
LuckyLee/Malakittens
Malakittens/LuckyLee
Mono/House/Math
His Fluffiness
Atum
TerRaine
Snowvon

Notes :
For the Mala v Lucky:
Mala: In retrospect I think a scum lean was more then fair for your opening few pages, but I to me, it looks a lot like you used meta reasoning for an OMGUS vote on Monochrome in response to her vote, which came before you even posted and was RVS. That said I think your more recent play was very town, and will be disappointed if you flip town.

Lucky: Looking at your earlier play with your claim in mind, I could understand a good bit of the thought process you were using. I can sorta see the logic of putting in-game pressure on MonoChrome at the point you did. However, I can not call what you did true in-game pressure, and it looks simply more like more like gas-lighting. I concur with Fontisian that there was little to no reason to have a scum read on Mono at that time, so do not understand what you were going for here. Futhermore, you then dug in, became somewhat less responsive, and allowed a target to be painted on you, and a late claim. I wonder if it would be better for town to lose you simply because it would at least clear the air. I hesitate strongly before risking a PR, but I have to wonder if this is fake-claim.

Snowvon: I've been making this case since my first posts will try to avoid re-hashing too much here. The inconsistencies in his read have been pointed out by me and others. A few things though. In #873 Snowvon defends Fontisian, but shortly after in #921 He posts "Ok Fonti can be town," and follows Fonti's vote. Also the sequence with TerRaine starting with TR's #882 has red flags everywhere. Snowvon votes for TR (and is the first vote as Fontisian keeps pointing out) after that post, but only after Ika has already begun pointing holes in TR's post. To add to an odd situation, in #899 with Snow's vote still on her, TR's defends snowvon's play!?!? The situation screams of Snowvon taking a opportunity to bus. Fontisian, I urge you to take another look at Snowvon during the Night, the scum tells are there, and it seems Snow has been trying hard to stay on your good side. Or is there a connection with you two I'm missing?

Atum: In retrospect I wish I had kept more pressure on him. I didn't particularly like his quick vote flip, and although it's been pointed out he tends to lurk, he really needs to contribute more.

Mathblade (prev House & Monochrome): I posted this above earlier, but thought it might have been ignored since it looked like the spot would be mod-killed with House's ban. It's more gut than anything, but even after my latest read through, something in his back and forth between Lucky and Mala is setting off my scum-dar

TLR: My reads, lynch from bottom up if i'm NK. At current point have serious doubts about Mala and Lucky being scum. Would support late compromise wagon if we can get the people.



---------- Post automerged at 01:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:55 PM ----------

Under an hour to the deadline... Anyone else have anything to add, on today's lynch or otherwise?

 

I am awake and here and ready to change the course of history if need be.

 

Unvote
Vote Malakittens

Sorry Mala.

Long story short, Lucky claiming seer when that happens to be a more common role than cop on Q's homesite isn't a coincidence. I also don't think he's the type to look that kind of detail up, though one of his scummates might have. I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt for now.

---------- Post automerged at 01:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:08 PM ----------

Actually, screw it.

Unvote
Vote his fluffiness

Mathblade, Von, Waco, if you could add your votes.

 

@Fontisian or anyone else: Does Lucky have a history of claiming/fake claiming?

---------- Post automerged at 01:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:10 PM ----------

Think that would still leave us on short since Mala would still have 5

 

Waco: Von and I are close friends irl, and I've played with or observed him in a ton of games. I'll look at him again, given the chance, because I look at everyone, but I'm not taking your accusations seriously.

 

No...I am not a little sheep dog to order with votes

I am not putting down a vote on someone that I don't have a read on with an hour til deadline.

I have a slight town lean on Waco for at least trying what I asked but I don't take orders from anyone on where my vote goes.

 

I suppose that's all I can really ask for. Though if this is really Snow's town playstyle, I get the feeling this may become a recurring issue in games

 

Lucky has a history of fakeclaiming, and messing it up. See Micro Mafia 3 again. The fact that he didn't mess this one up works in his favor.

If we all vote for fluff, there's a chance a Mala voter will come in before the deadline to switch their vote. Better to try than to do nothing.

---------- Post automerged at 01:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:14 PM ----------

This is a request, not an order.

Lucky's claim is good enough to save him, and Rubicon and Von are vouching for Mala. I strongly believe fluff is scum, as do Von and Citrus. Have a little faith, please.

 

He has once that I know of.

Also I'm unclear on something in your wall. You think its odd I was town reading Snow when he was voting me as scum?

 

Well then gl, hf.

<3

 

@Q: What happens in a tie?
E.g. Mala has 5 votes and LL has 5 votes?

 

Morning

Vote: his fluffiness

 

There's two things that make me wonder about a fake-claim:
1) It seems way out there that Lucky would go that far out of the Monochrome thing if all he needed to day was survive day 1 to use his one-shot power.
2) While his history says fake-claims are not his forte, all he did was simply state a role, and didn't reply to Rubicon's post about it, nor anything else since, afraid that he'll blow his claim if he talks again?

 

Unknown tiebreaker.

---------- Post automerged at 01:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:19 PM ----------

@MathBlade

 

Something happens. We don't know what it is. But something.

 

See the whole Waco giving out reads I like, but his sticky vote on snow that serves no purpose I don't like

 

Unvote
Vote: his fluffiness

 

Last time I saw him do this he won the game.

So I wouldn't say he always messes it up

 

This.

The other thing I don't like is how many people in this thread aren't voting for fluffy.