ffs.

Gonna elaborate on this, champ? Like, as far as pointless fluff posts go, this one seems unlike you.

--

I don't really see the strength of your case though, I'm asking to explain it again.
Is it just the Snow thing?

--

Why did you check Rubicon of all people. You said you were going to check fonti. What changed?
And I'm not seeing any read towards Rubicon from you yesterday - point it out to me, if you have it.

Also, what? You either get "Guilty" or "No Result"? You don't get "Innocents"?
...This is reminding me uncomfortably of your double-vig claim in B&T. -__-

--

Rebuttal, Fonti?
Ter, walk me through what happened yesterday where you voted for fluff.

--

In Batman you were aggressive scumhunting. Here it was more like...
Fonti: Math, vote this way.
Math: BITCH YOU DON'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO.
^Paraphrased, but that's what I mean

He actually claims "No Result" is one of 2 normal results he can get - which is bullshit in and of itself, but this loud reaction shows you're not really reading.

--
Rubicon, I asked you stuff during the Night.

--

Ok, just going to stop you for a second - just because you see something as 'cannot rightfully be called this' doesn't mean I do.

'Sides, I didn't call Lee a "full" cop or whatever. I just called him a cop.

Admittedly, I paid less attention to the one-shot thing, but it simply didn't seem relevant. Apparently the universe agrees 'cause now he's saying he has more.

When will you learn I'm always right, sugarlips?

We're not getting into an argument of whether one-shot cop is still cop, I cannot think of anything more tedious. It is. -__-

1) That discussion wasn't nearly as detailed as you make it out to be, but yeah, I did pick up on the idea.

2) You're trying really hard to make it sound I wanted to lynch Lee. There were TWO wagons, and my vote was on Mala (who was Town, but we didn't know that at the time).
The only reason we're talking about Lee is because you decided to press me on his claim.

So...yeah. The one not making sense is the one acting like I was demanding a lynch on Lee.

---------- Post automerged at 02:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:41 PM ----------

And ninja'd. A lot.
Reading.

 

I changed my mind about lynching Luckylee yesterday because I thought about things more and decided it would be better strategy to see what happened during the night.

 

@Sloth

The delicious post was both reminding myself to go back to this (as I was on my phone and couldn't go hunting for what I liked to quote) AND in case I got night killed I wanted to leave a crumb of how good the page was without getting myself night killed. My thoughts will come withing a day or so as I'm kinda busy and that'll take a bit of time + effort

 

Sloth, what?

1. I have nothing to defend myself from wrt TerRaine. I did a townie thing in CYS because doing townie things in one of the best ways to look town. I did a townie thing here because it's also one of the best ways to be town.

2.Did you really just try to turn around the evidence that you were paying attention to the thread by claiming that I thought you were pushing for Lucky's lynch when I never said anything like that? I mean, I'd feel better about you if you had wanted to lynch Lucky.

---------- Post automerged at 03:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:49 PM ----------

You understand that hinting at analysis and then not providing it is very irritating, right?

 

I arrived closer to Day end than not and i believe it was rubicon who asked me about fluff. I will admit I was busy and distracted and not keeping up wth the thread as I should have been. I asked rubicon for a case as I tried to go back and read up on fluff a bit.

Rubicon pointed out his weak vote on mala and a timidness that he didn't have so much in Batman. As i read I agreed with this read. I also noticed that Fluff responded to my request for a case against him. His response was to point out that I have been present in every full game he's played on here which struck me as odd since it wasn't relevant to my request for people's cases on him. It stuck me a someone posting to appeal to emotion and gut read ("Come on you KNOW me") which i don't recall him doing when pressured in batman...and also doesn't work on me because as you know I'm kind of souless.

So he seemed a stronger candidate then Mala and I put my vote down.

 

I'm tired, if you're not happy then vote me or something. I said I'd do it within a day, as I have class soon so I can't do it right now.

Do you think Lucky is scum right now or not? 1-10 if you don't want to give a one word answer (1 scum - 10 town)

 

Everyone else is irrelevant as either they're inactive or I don't care about them.

You and Fonti are the two strongest players in the game to me (Sloth is pretty inactive) so I focus on you two. I checked you because I figured since I claimed I was checking Fonti it would be interfered in. That and your statement felt weird to me, as if it was dismissive.

---------- Post automerged at 03:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:56 PM ----------

Holy ninja batman.

 

I mean it doesn't have to be a secret anymore. Analysis wise I'm talking about the Seer thing and how some players knew what it was and some didn't. I'm really interested in seeing which players 'knew' what seer was right off the bat before you went out and said what it was in thread. And then the waffling around of some players about that point after it was brought up.

Ex: I think Ter had a frustration post about you using synonyms? Which felt very scum!frustration-ish

---------- Post automerged at 02:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:57 PM ----------

</3

/10brokenhearts

 

Sorry Citrus- but it's the truth~

Fonti and Rubicon are the most relevant to me.

 

Lucky, that doesn't answer the questions.
1. Short of a bus driver, how would you even expect there to be a problem in checking me that you wouldn't have in checking Rubicon? Godfather is role distributed randomly and a roleblock would have hit you regardless of who you checked. So, what were you worried about?
2. You had a town read on ika, who Rubicon replaced. What happened to that read?
3. Why is it that you're saying your only results are Guilty or No Result, when Q's previous game had "Town, Antitown or No Result"?

 

Would anyone like to counterclaim Lucky?

Cop, seer, role cop, watcher, and tracker are all acceptable counterclaims.

 

I can think of why Lucky suddenly has another shot, but not why he was paranoid of his fonti check getting interfered with.

I just wish he had picked someone who hadn't replaced ika the supertown.

 

Why not Mala?

 

Night has come and gone. What are your thoughts?

--

...Are you even reading what I'm saying? o.o
You never said I was pushing for Lee's lynch, and I never said you did.
What I'm saying is you are pressing me on how not lynching him made sense, and how everyone agreed, as if going "Sloth, damnit, lynching Lee would have been stupid, stop being stupid."
Whereas I'm just standing here thinking, "yeah, my whole point wasn't that we should have voted lee, it's that we had him or Mala - I would have preferred Mala, so how the hell did it end up being fluff? What's your point?"

Also it is REALLY ironic that you would tell Rubicon that and then go on to give Lee a justification for the question you were asking him.

(Also, awwww, fonti! We're clashing heads again. I've missed it so.)

 

@Sloth, my read on TerR is based mainly on #882 and #899, plus the potential Snowvon connection. Additionally, there were not many posts from Ter that really gave me a town feel. If TerR can keep up with her first few posts from today and continue in that vein, I will have to re-consider.

@Atum, You said yesterday you respond well under pressure. Consider this that pressure, and be more involved today.

 

You seriously need to ask?

---------- Post automerged at 01:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:25 PM ----------

Waco, thoughts on Lucky?

 

The fuck? That wasn't my point at all.

My point is that you knowing that Lucky claimed cop equivalent while not understanding the Seer argument is weird as fuck, as may indicate either 1. that you were told about events in the scumchat instead of reading them yourself or 2.That you just skimmed instead of reading.

 

@Rubicon

Given my read through during the Night, and what's happened today, I'm actually leaning towards town on Lucky.

Myself and others have consider the possibility of a fake claim scum!Lucky. As I see it, if Lucky was scum and was faking his checks, I would've expected him to have claimed to checked Malakittens, who was a surprising NK. Furthermore, why would he fake a mod comment that would put him under further scrutiny?

Given this, my next step will be to consider what from Lucky's reads would change given you receiving a town check

---------- Post automerged at 06:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:21 PM ----------

Also Rubicon, what are your thoughts on TerRaine and Fontisian?

 

Because Mala is irrelevant to me. Her attitude of lynch me idc made me disregard her. You on the other hand are a strong active player, knowing if you're scum or not means far more to me

 

Lucky: who are your top scum reads?