No, I have in fact read them, it's just that that post still looks like scum frustration

---------- Post automerged at 09:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:16 PM ----------

I'm not doing Math today

 

Ok. What about Sloth, Atum or Waco?

 

Okay. For the record I don't really buy into the whole Cop/Seer whatever. Did anyone else besides you and Sloth (I think he did) mention it?

The second point is sort of meh, if he missed the post.

The third one is bad, I agree.

Citrus, what exactly happened with the quote thing? Do you remember why you had it copied in the first place?

---------- Post automerged at 22:23 ---------- Previous post was at 22:21 ----------

Rubicon, I'm pretty sure my most recent completed scumgame is the Chairman one. Is that it?

 

I could do Sloth. Atum's basically playing the exact same as he did in Batmafia.

I'm a little frustrated with him because his alignment feels like it'd be flipping a coin if we lynched him. Maybe a little more likely town because he'd be screwing his scummates over if he were actually scum and playing this way?

Idk about Waco. He has the feel of a lot of posts that look good / seem to reach the bar, but then I feel like he hasn't moved the game forward - stuff like pushing on Snowvon for days (I think? Or something like that) which hasn't amounted to anything changing/happening til the recent wagon

 

I concur with Rubicon for the most part. Citrus, Sloth Fontisian, Mathblade. I haven't ruled out TerRaine completely.

Given the votes Atum doesn't make sense. I have Rubicon as town, and Lucky seems to be.

I'm not sure what to make of Atum. I've been reading him on the scum side most of the way (albeit with limited data). I couldn't make out his thought process in his last few posts.

 

I remember something that looked super scummy from TerRaine. I think it was another post, but I couldn't find any from the second quote up to when I posted.

It might've just been a blank space, I had a lot of tabs open and I was grabbing and it was a weird post with the separation between people so I might've messed up and grabbed a random quote like that. I remember I went back to the TerRaine section and typed that in last at the end before hitting post because I thought the day-vig thing would push across how strong I feel about this case, which makes me think it's the grabbed a random quote thing? idk

 

Snowvon, you linked me one of your games in BatMafia. I guess I can try to find the post.

That post is what I'm talking about. He has no positive scum reads, and when pressured, cannot think of reasons why his targets are scum. Is he acting calm? Yes, I'll give you that much.

What do you think about him scumreading the same people as last game?

Do you think Citrus and TerRaine are both town?

 

Elaborate on this please.

 

Why Sloth Citrus?

You give reasons to your feelings on Waco and Atum.

So what about Sloth?

 

Yeah, that should be Batmafia. I basically played that game the same way I would have as town, because it was basically three unaligned Neutrals vs. town.

---------- Post automerged at 22:28 ---------- Previous post was at 22:28 ----------

derp

Chairman, not Batmafia

 

I don't think it was the Chairmen game.

 

I am at least 90% sure it was Chairman, because I remember complaining about making it to endgame and still losing.

 

So? He has strong town-reads and he's going after the people he's not townreading. Ask him why the people he's town-reading are town, if you're that insistent on it.

And I really don't care about him scumreading the same people. Did he suspect TerRaine in that game?

Yessssss.

 

Process of elimination mostly. TerRaine is in there because it was her early interaction with Snow that caught my attention. Otherwise as I said, Rubicon I see as town, Lucky appears to be a seer, and Atum/Snow's voting today doesn't seem to make for likely teammates.

 

Okay apparently it was Chairman Mafia.

How do you read Citrus?

 

With great difficulty.

Citrus is town because if he was scum he would have overrode the stupid decision to kill Mala.

 

But Sloth wouldn't have?

 

Sloth's valuations are a littler weirder and less consistent.

 

I like this post from Terraine. It shows a lot of clear logical thought. IMO Terraine is town.

I don't think Mala was a stupid decision after reading the thread. Mala looks to be what Titus calls a "null kill" meaning that scum could have liked the direction things were going and did a "null kill". A lot of people are bickering back and forth and Fonti saying it was a "stupid decision to kill Mala" sounds regret rather than actually believing someone would override it. For Fontisian's theory to work, it would require one of me/LuckyLee to be scum and have a scum buddy who is new enough to not override it.

This has two problems: 1) I'm town. 2) It assumes scum would play the game the same way as Fonti and the only way I see that is if Fonti is scum herself.

Vote Fontisian

 

Math, you should respond to the case fonti made against you.

---------- Post automerged at 09:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:22 PM ----------

Here is a link for your convenience: https://forums.darklordpotter.net/showpost.php?p=791674&postcount=166