It is indeed.

*stretches his town-firmable limbs*

The only concern with that is that scum could try to force a last second mislynch a la Sloth tomorrow.

Sorry Fontisian, but as your glorious leader I'll be choosing the lynches from here.

Today we'll be doing a tie between me and either whomever Lucky has a guilty on or who I pick.

Tomorrow we'll be lynching whomever I pick.

We're not doing that thing where we put the game in a position where you could win if you're scum, which is still possible.

 

Yeah, we're not doing that.

 

Oh and I'm strictly a Town Mayor, it's just more fun to also be the glorious leader

 

I think mayors outrank townspeople.

 

It's too bad there's exactly no good reasons not to.

---------- Post automerged at 03:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:09 PM ----------

What State Farm said

 

I don't know how I feel on the Ika vs Fonti thing. All in all I might ignore it for now. Might be easier to read them both when the focus is on other plays and not each other. Very happy with my vote on Mala for now. After Batman though I realize I need to work on my conf bias so theres's always the chance of being wrong but the defensiveness is pinging me. Not sure I've met Waco before so I'd like to see some activity from them. If some body has played with them before can you give me an idea on what to expect or point me to the games theyve been in? Leaning town on Snow at the moment. Leaning scum on Sloth because its better for him to prove he isnt scum then for me to assume it. As I said in every game since Werewolf...proceed with caution on him.

 

Because it's stupid?

We're going to have a regular day, not be dictated to, which will give Waco and TerRaine the chance to prove themselves. The only difference is that we'll accept that the top candidate and you must be tied by the deadline.

 

Goddammit TerRaine, again?

 

Ter, why did you claim there?

 

Well that explains why it sounded so weird and forced lol. Nice crumb

 

Because I was not sure what roles were in the game since closed set up. If there was any kind of track role (ie you can see who a player targeted or what action they took) i didnt want a town player to waste their ability to get "Terraine sat on her ass last night and ate chips"

 

Someone's pretending they didn't get called out. Thanks for explaining exactly why we're not doing any of your plans, showing you disagree with what you proposed 5 minutes before.

There is enough chance for scum!Fontisian that we're not letting you dictate everything (or anything) as I remember at least 1 game where you dictated a plan that got you from almost a loss to a win by dictating lynches/night actions

 

.....hehehehhe. Its fun.

 

You're missing the point. That's my proposal of what we do, with room for suggestions and arguments from other people.

You are attempting to use your role to decide what to do absolutely, and that's insane.

 

I think I'm willing to push TerRaine into the town pile and drop Fontisian back to null land.

Which leaves today's lynch at Fontisian vs. Waco Kid.

*goes and gets popcorn*

 

Fuck. Now I have to look up if scum!mayors are possible, even if they're stupidly op. Thanks, Citrus,

 

... Well fuck. I checked Sloth >.>

 

Vote: Waco

fonti/Citrus smackdown. I can dig it.

 

If youre the mayor /tie breaker why did you act like you didnt know there was a tie breaking mechanic?

 

Fontisian losing as scum is not insanity, it's inevitable.

You're attempting to use your position as a strong player on this forum to decide what to do almost-aboslutely.

What if I had a gazillion extra votes given by Q? If I'm confident enough in my reads, I actually can dictate what happens because that's what my role does.

Right now I think the final scum is Waco Kid or you. Honestly I think it's Waco Kid, but I'm getting more and more paranoid of you by the post.