Lucky, If I had to pick, Irene. She seems to want to make nice with people too much. That being said, I would rather those not be the wagons.

 

Catching up finally!

 

Just a quick clarification before I head off for the night. I'm making nice because I don't want to degenerate anything into massive fights again like me vs. fontisian thing. I still stick to all of my reads regarding people, and pushing, but I'm trying not to be aggressive to the point of offending people since I don't think fights like me vs. fonti are protown.

As to the rest Riley's reply etc. I will give them proper read-overs tomorrow when I have time, along with any other posts before my reply. Till then.

 

My Scum!Titus radar is actually pinging off right now (and I'm ready for her to proceed to tunnel me in addition to Riley for saying this)

Unvote

Vote Titus

1. She comes in with her troll-style for D1.
2. She gets pretty aggressive and attacks someone who calls her out in general and starts to push on her (with pretty much direct doubt casting in the quote above. Strongly reads of her trying to sway others' than her genuinely caring to push Riley on that).

I'm not comfortable lynching either Fontisian or Irene today. Both are strong town players (haven't played with Irene before but it seems like a reasonable assumption). They are almost definitely not scum together.

Titus is also very anti-3rd party hunting. Note that if we lynch Allocen early, we basically have free reign to mass-claim and beat the shit out of the entirety of the non-town. There's also no way to re-introduce role souping with Allocen gone barring bastard modding shenanigans.

 

Still going over the thread(this is gonna be a long, tedious task today), but I agree with Citrus. He said it better than I have regarding Titus, and I'm not feeling as sure of Rubicon now as I was.

UNVOTE Rubicon

VOTE Titus.

 

Wow Citrus's catchup took all of 8 minutes. Zenzao pops with a me too. 3 votes in 4 posts... This is not suspicious at all guys...

Yeah I am against deliberately Allocean hunting. We shall catch Allocen by lynching.

Citrus you are right I am not trying to dominate the thread. I has hammer and I am sticking with that.

---------- Post automerged at 01:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:19 PM ----------

I tend to like people who do not care if they are liked. It's more personality.

Fonti's question was like asking a fat kid, do you want kale or anubis?

 

Another statement where she's trying to doubt cast anyone that casts suspicion on her but doesn't actually care to follow up on such a read

Please note "this is not suspicious at all guys" which pretty much epitomizes that idea

 

I thought Titus being a third party was an open secret?

 

Actually, I scumread both of you before hand.

Z has been well documented and I highlighted my suspicions of you in my respobse to Riley regarding your activity level being a basis for his townread.

If anything, the reverse is true.

---------- Post automerged at 01:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:28 PM ----------

The allegation certainly draws the scums to the yard. Me and my third party boobs.

 

I think you are scummy for the following reasons:

1. Not voting for who you your highest scum read is. Multiple people have called you out on this.
2. Not finishing your reads and holding your reads hostage saying you'll provide one a day seems like a stall tactic to try to stay alive and prevent a wagon from forming. Why is delaying your reads protown? Explain it.
3. The strategic order of how you placed your reads. Why not start with your top scum read? I could possibly believe with a long wall you might have forgotten a vote on the end or were waiting on someone to post to make sure your vote is visible but having it on a read wall on other than your top scum read is weird. Hence why I think it's a set up to where you could say Rubicon was scummy later.
4. Post 157 is the first thing that caught my attention as well. It's your very first post. Rubicon's next post is 195 where he ignores the suspicion on him from Polysemous but yet then asks Titus who she'd want to wagon. Why? Does he believe the suspicion isn't genuine? This is the second time he's outright ignored suspicion of him, probably accidental again, but at the same time it could be strategic ignoring so a conversation doesn't start up. Between that and posting a Rubicon wall for probable self defense purposes later is a huge arrow pointing towards investigating Polysemous and Rubicon together.
5. Your "willingness" to vote Rubicon other than your scum read when pressured. It's like you have a huge self preservation that you have to maintain.
6. Your own mentioned flip flop.

Titus -- Ignoring people not cool.
Not understanding your point about the kale. Just seems mean.
I get what you are saying about Bahamut but please for the love of God shut up about it. The more you keep up about it when I am saying I understand the more it feels duplicitous.
Saying scum don't crumb is a lie because of BatMafia 2. You crumbed with me a lot.

While I think you're probably town because I think I finally get what you are doing, what you are doing would probably get you lynched and you'd probably end up self hammering. It's better if we actually lynch scum. So either you're a liar or you're town but seriously your play right now is counter productive so please scum hunt and don't ask me to put it all on my shoulders. If we're both town we're supposed to work together. This anti-town crap is annoying. If I'm right and you are town your end game skills would be needed. In essence I almost feel as if you are playing a jester of sorts. You are one of my scumspects and while I'd prefer Poly >> Rubicon >> Fonti first you are in my potential reads and that you could be lying. It's really weird. I don't like it. Please fly straight.

---------- Post automerged at 13:49 ---------- Previous post was at 13:35 ----------
Citrus -- Even if Allocen gets lynched today, I'm against mass claim. There's something I can't explain towards it. I think there's something bastard here that prevents mass claim. I can't explain why though. Mass claim has to be avoided until I am sure though sorry.

 

@Math, Crumbing that way was a dead indicator of a lie. I meant crumbing my way. I think you got my answer and its impossible to soup so yeah.

Who did I ignore?

My point about the Kale was Lucky was asking me which townish helpful poster I wanted to lynch. Both are terrible much like fat kids don't like kale.

 

Can you quote these posts?

 

Go ahead and lay out your case on me again, then, Titus, because you've been deliberately obnoxious when it comes to dealing with me for several IRL days now. You've ignored my posts unless it fits your agenda. You've been doubtcasting me. I'm frankly sick it of - bring your case up, point by point, and lets get this debate started.

You know I'm not Scum, because I am no where near good enough to camouflage that behavior against a player of your level and your level of insight. You saw my thoughts and reactions in Batmafia 2 as Scum; you know how I think and how I play as Scum. You on other hand have gone into this bullshido trollololo behavior to throw off any meta I could bring against you in turn.

As I said to Atum near the beginning of the game, get off your high horse and face me straight on already instead of hiding behind "its well documented". Bring. It. Now.

Came for the Scummy behavior, stayed for the boobs. +1

 

For what (concerning me)?

 

Being generally lurktastic and unhelpful.

 

/dies of laughter

 

Zenzao, if you directed something at me I missed. Say so.

Otherwise I tend to respond to bullshit or things that need to be elaborated only.

 

My asking of Von about you was #288, and your scum read of me was #304. Then the shenanigans with Irene happened and you forgot all about me </3

Titus, what are your scumreads? Colorful ones would be nice~

Also, which of you is the evil twin, Mathblade or yourself. Serious question.

 

Vote: Titus

For admitting she lied and not explaining why. Explain.

 

Right.

Post 288:

You asked Von's thoughts on 6 different people, one of whom was me.

You're claiming that my post 304, which scumread you and had explanations for doing so ("Luckylee hasn’t done anything towny, which rare enough on its own. Add in the overly serious behavior early on and poking people about activity (a weak attack that he tends to fall back on) and I want him dead.") happened because you asked Von about me and five other people? Really?

This also contradicts your previous statement:

Which is interesting because I never voted for you. You actually changed your vote to me after I switched from fluff to Irene.

Have you actually been reading the thread Lucky?