It would probably be something stupid, yes.

 

What do you think of the interaction I just had with Citrus?

 

Already talked about it a bit. I'll add that he's putting too much emphasis on vote counts. If Sloth is scum, then I could see his reaction as him not wanting to be linked to a partner, but that's weak, and I wouldn't put much weight on it.

 

Hmm. Are you mis-repping that game on purpose or on accident?

---------- Post automerged at 11:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:25 PM ----------

Too much emphasis on vote counts, or too much emphasis on competing wagons.

I'm looking forward to the point where you think you can actually get away with mislynching me and then proceed to act on it. Props for being a little more cautious this time

 

How am I misrepping it?

You agree that you primarily reacted to the word "fake" in that game, yeah? Because if not, I can quote you saying that.

---------- Post automerged at 12:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:26 AM ----------

Oops, sorry, it was to the word ingenuine. Same thing.

 

Interesting. You really believe that?

 

You've talked about your post count and how it makes you town three times in one page. Why? You know quantity = town.

Why are you reacting like this instead of actually responding the arguments I made? Why are you accusing me of trying to mislynch you, when actually we're both going for Von? Why is this attitude only coming out after I called you out for not having it in the slightest?

---------- Post automerged at 12:31 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:31 AM ----------

*quantity != town.

I am very tired.

---------- Post automerged at 12:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:31 AM ----------

Why is that "interesting?" What does "interesting" even mean.

If you're asking if I think ingenuine and fake mean the same thing, then, duh.

If you're asking if I think you should have reacted to the fake accusation in the first place, then:

---------- Post automerged at 12:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:34 AM ----------

You said I should know what you were doing. What exactly should I have known, Citrus?

---------- Post automerged at 12:38 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:35 AM ----------

Say something, lemon.

---------- Post automerged at 12:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:38 AM ----------

Citrus is attempting to deny me a high post count. This will not stand.

 

My need to drive is the one standing in the way of your post count. Gimme a sec to get in my computer

---------- Post automerged at 11:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:45 PM ----------

Reading those words again makes me very glad I worded it that way.

Interesting as in "huh I thought she understood how she messed up. But she's probably not feigning ignorance? So she really doesn't get it?"

Why am I reacting this way? Because reasons

 

Ok. I'm going to shower and then go to sleep shortly afterwards. Hopefully you'll post in the meantime.

 

Obviously ingenuine and fake mean the same thing, I'm not that pedantic

---------- Post automerged at 11:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:50 PM ----------

I'm already here fontisian I had to walk from my car

 

Dude. We've discussed the "murder for vagueness" rule.

 

"You said I should know what you were doing. What exactly should I have known, Citrus?"

This referring to what?

---------- Post automerged at 11:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:51 PM ----------

Because I said I am acting that way for reasons? Ok, replaced reasons with [redacted] if that makes you happier

 

True or false: You reacted to me calling your logic ingenuine in that game. I hinted at the same thing this game. No reaction.

Please explain your thought process through the whole thing. Thanks.

---------- Post automerged at 12:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:52 AM ----------

Explain.
/ten

 

False /10char

 

Dude, you have so many things you could say that would help you here.

Why you asked demonturtle those questions, a goal behind your bulletproof thing, literally any reads, any of the things I've asked explanations on.

What are you doing?

 

I don't actually remember anymore. Potentially me goading you the way I am currently doing so under the assumption that you understood why I was doing so?

 

What part is false. Use your fucking words.

 

Vote: Snowvon

Time to move to plan C.

 

I don't need no handouts. Nor do I need your validation. That is not my purpose (nor really should it be technically speaking anyways)

I already explained why I asked demonturtle those questions, I have pretty fuzzy reads because I've been paying not much attention to this game and not much is happening - Newcomb feels town, Miner is medium town, Acionyx is weaker but still reasonable strength town, nothing else except null for all others except you - , I've answered every one of your questions and if I haven't feel free to point any I've missed out

 

What.

I understand you did the bulletproof thing to wifom about getting shot and likely convince scum not to shoot you. This irritates, as I would prefer you get shot in the night and save me the trouble of reading you, and it gives you a lovely excuse to be alive late game.

I think you didn't react to me, trolled instead, and voted Von because you thought the bus would divert my attention.

So, that's what I think you were doing. This is the part where you explain the town reasoning behind what you were doing.

Or get lynched. I'm not picky.

---------- Post automerged at 12:59 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:58 AM ----------

You have answered 0.5 of my questions. Congratulations.