1. DLP Flash Christmas Competition + Writing Marathon 2024!

    Competition topic: Magical New Year!

    Marathon goal? Crank out words!

    Check the marathon thread or competition thread for details.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hi there, Guest

    Only registered users can really experience what DLP has to offer. Many forums are only accessible if you have an account. Why don't you register?
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Introducing for your Perusing Pleasure

    New Thread Thursday
    +
    Shit Post Sunday

    READ ME
    Dismiss Notice

Arrival

Discussion in 'Movies, Music and TV shows' started by Azira, Nov 12, 2016.

  1. astus

    astus First Year

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2007
    Messages:
    46
    Location:
    Connecticut
    My impression was that it was due to experiencing time like the heptapods. She chose to have the child, because from her perspective even after death she can still spend time with her daughter. It does seem like a dick move to pull on her husband though, so long as he doesn't learn heptapod. Trying to think about whether the kid would want to live knowing she would die is something I can't quite wrap my head around.
     
  2. Azira

    Azira High Inquisitor DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    Messages:
    598
    Location:
    Israel
    How is it a dick move? I mean every single child brought into this world is going to die anyway, so should parents not have them? Sure, some die more violent or uncomfortable deaths than others, at earlier time points, but still. She didn't "knowingly doom" anybody to anything.
     
  3. Erandil

    Erandil Minister of Magic

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,339
    Location:
    Germany
    This would still make it an insanely selfish move since in effect she is willing to accept the early and painful death of her child for the sake of her own happiness.


    There is massive difference between taking the relatively small risk of having your child die early/painfully etc. and the absolute certainty of it happening.

    Is your opinion really that there is nothing wrong with having a child when you know, 100%, that it will suffer immensely and die an early death? That it will never have an opportunity to actually fully experience life,grow old have kids, travel etc.? Because to me that is an extremely unethical decision and she doesn't have any possible excuse to make it. And she doesn't only "harm" the child but also the rest of the family (most prominently the father) as well as any friends the child makes.
     
  4. TheWiseTomato

    TheWiseTomato Prestigious Tomato ~ Prestige ~ DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2009
    Messages:
    1,084
    Location:
    Australia.
    High Score:
    3694
    By that measure you're also saying, "This child is going to experience and cause pain in its life through no fault of its own, and so it should never live."
     
  5. Azira

    Azira High Inquisitor DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    Messages:
    598
    Location:
    Israel
    So it's better for them to never live? How about you ask anyone who's ever had a kid that died before 10 (or any random young age) if they regretted having them. I don't even know what you're arguing, was the plot point 'unrealistic'? You don't understand the characters motivations? If you think her having a kid was mean, then you didn't understand the movie at all.
     
  6. Erandil

    Erandil Minister of Magic

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,339
    Location:
    Germany

    Yes? Because nobody would be harmed by the child not existing (or at least not as nearly as much as it would be the case if she would exist)? And any RL example falls flat since they had no possibility of predicting that their child would die that early/painfully (barring certain medical procedures that would derail this discussion). Because I would hope that parents would decide against having a child if they knew with absolute certainty that it would die that early.

    And I have stated my problem with that scene multiple times - I either find the portrayal of time in the movie problematic - since it effectively removes freewill or, if that isn't the case, find the decision and justification of having the child highly problematic.
     
  7. atlas_hugged

    atlas_hugged Fourth Year

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2015
    Messages:
    131
    High Score:
    0
    I saw this one earlier this week, and it is legitimately great. The fantastic plot, philosophical elements (I like how people are now discussing determinism and it's ethical implications in this thread), and excellent visuals all combine for a wonderful experience. My only problem with the film is the director loves long meandering shots and inception type noises way too much. Those got a bit annoying by the end of the experience.

    For what it's worth, I don't think there is free will in the traditional sense in this movie. The idea of people viewing time non linearly, such that they get visions of their future indicates a pretty hard determinism. If you think she was selfish for having the child, then her selfishness was necessary, because without the child, she wouldn't have had some of the visions that led her to deciphering the language and saving the potential for a human/alien alliance.

    I don't think it's selfish either. 20 years of life as a happy child is better than no years of life as anything.
     
  8. astus

    astus First Year

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2007
    Messages:
    46
    Location:
    Connecticut
    I think the movie addressed the topic, because Louise chose to have Hannah and waited a few years to tell Ian what she knew. Ian leaving Louise and growing distant from Hannah seems representative of someone who would not have wanted to bring a child into the world he knew would live a short and painful life. Or maybe he just felt betrayed and being around Hannah hurt too much.