Day 1
Tom (7): Jarizok, Newcomb, Typhon, His Fluffiness, Rubicon, Jan, Vira
His Fluffiness (2): Miner, Tom
Jarizok (1): Fontisian
Rubicon (1): The Waco Kid
Fontisian (1): Koalas

Not Voting (1): Cobalt

Day 2

Cobalt (5): Nachomamma8, Rubicon, Jarizok, Jan, His Fluffiness
Rubicon (4): Typhon, Vira, Koalas, Miner

Not Voting (2): Cobalt, Tammy

Day 3

Rubicon (5): Vira, Typhon, Jarizok, Koalas, His Fluffiness
Koalas (3): Rubicon, Tammy, Nachoamamma8

Not Voting (0): Jan

Day 4

Vira (2): Nachomamma8, Tammy
Tammy (1): Vira

Not Voting (4): Jan, Koalas, His Fluffiness, Typhon


Damn that's pretty.

---------- Post automerged at 01:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:38 PM ----------

To justify your block voting the past couple of Days. Then your 'oh woe is me' case on her that you posted before your Watcher 'results'. Get a little distancing in before you try and shove a mislynch in Lylo.

---------- Post automerged at 01:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:41 PM ----------
Tammy Come! vote with your partner. Then post your Auction actions, getting this tied up today would be great.

 

That's beautiful reasoning, Koalas.

---------- Post automerged at 11:16 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:15 AM ----------

For one, I don't think there's any world where Tammy neighborizing me justifies "block voting", and there's been nothing in our actual posts that use the neighborhood to justify "block voting".

---------- Post automerged at 11:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:16 AM ----------

The "oh woe is me" reasoning point is nonsense, don't actually understand what you're trying to get at there and doubt you do either.

 

Ok, so there is scum between you two. Good to know.

 

Welcome to the game fluff!

---------- Post automerged at 11:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:19 AM ----------

Are you able to stick around for a while?

---------- Post automerged at 11:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:20 AM ----------

Also, a small survey I've spontaneously decided to conduct - do you think that neighborizing someone makes a good excuse to block vote with them?

There's no real reason why I'm asking this question, just feeling a bit spontaneous today.

 

Yes, because neighbourized players never reach a consensus in their opinions and drive a common scum read. Only in this case you're scum so you're faking that.

Oh woe is me is 1650, where you put a ton of effort into showing how good scum Tammy is when playing with you. Then going 'lol found a scum guyz!'

 

except i never claimed that me and tammy reached some magical consensus and united together like the wonder twins on some common scumread. i pushed a scumread, tammy joined. you sat there on the sidelines, had tammy as a preference, then... let us push through vira for some reason?

---------- Post automerged at 11:26 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:25 AM ----------

i spent a little time reminiscing about how horribly scum tammy has trashed me in the past. as i believe i've said it was an entirely self-indulgent post.

---------- Post automerged at 11:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:26 AM ----------

fluff, still waiting on that response to my personal survey. it's HIGHLY IMPORTANT and also HIGHLY SPONTANEOUS.

 

I was gonna play a game of league, but saw the thread. So here I am.

---------- Post automerged at 12:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:28 PM ----------

Hmm. Gonna say no.

 

"Guys I never directly said we were voting together/driving a mislynch that's just how it coincidentally played out."

I got ambushed with an end of exams house party. Made posting a little difficult.

 

That's a good answer because it doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
And yet Koalas gets a guilty claimed on him and his first reaction is "haha! tammy neighborized you so you could vote together!". If I got a guilty claimed on me, my first reaction would be burying the shit out of the scumfuck who dared cross my path, not whatever the hell Koalas came up with.

 

That's also some, uh, notworthy word choice. Excuse to block vote. Kind of sounds like you know exactly what you were doing.

 

We voted together, for sure. We voted you together when you were almost certainly not getting lynched over Rubicon. Then, we voted Vira together because I pushed a case on Vira and Tammy voted to survive.

No one claimed that this was because of neighborizer shit except for you; would recommend you dial back on posting for a little while and wait for Tammy to coach you before you dig a hole you can't get out of.

 

Koalas, Nacho, who would the last scum be and why? I want both of you to answer this one.

 

My first reaction your partner cause you're obviously scum. Compare to you making up 1650 while sitting on a guilty check.

 

"You used the words I used when referring to my argument! Haha! Ha. Ha."

 

TIL Justify = Excuse

 

Tammy, for the reasons I laid out in the opening.
In particular, her reaction to being lynched; Tammy loves being town, has never been mislynched as town ever. Her end of day yesterday doesn't look anything like that.

 

Did she tell you who she neighborized last night?

 

"My first reaction your partner because you're obviously scum" - what?

All of the thoughts I had last night were about Tammy, I was fully expecting to eat a roleblock last night. Getting you instead was a pleasant surprise and the reason I feel fucking pumped this game, but Tammy is the read I was most excited to share because Tammy is the person I've played with for a while and Tammy is the person who I specifically need redemption against; rolling over you in the process is just a bonus.

---------- Post automerged at 11:40 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:39 AM ----------

Nope!!!!!!

 

Tammy 19 times out of 20. For wagon placements and being obvious scum endgaming with Nacho. You in the odd universe.

 

I thought we were partners because she neighborized me?