Not really.

Do your thing. Play the game and a read will come one way or another.

Doesn't mean you have to get overinvested. Only means I need a handful of reads and a position in thread etc. Because if I know one thing then it is that I suck at soulreading you.


But I am heading to work now anyway.
Mal said things. but it ended with this is a good breakpoint, which makes me think more is coming.
Curious to see that.

 

FWIW I did point out the possibility that Jan was white-knighting me in the last game at one point, got slapped around by Fonti (I think) for mentioning it, and let it die as I had bigger issues at the time

From point 2 on down, I feel like you wrote out the words inside my head.

 

Mal, my point is that Jari didn't actually read or think about the case, so he thought it was terrible. Instead of argui, he decided to make an offhand comment. If think it's decent, because, and this is important, I read it.

Also, I don't get what you're talking about at reption select. You're saying I blank voted Jari to be able to give my reasoning later as scum after seeing everyone's interactions, yeah? But, why? I was already voting for you with a case?

Or, with the vote on you in the first place. You're claiming I questioned the townread on you to set myself up for a potential vote on you later. But. I lumped you. And I'm the record in several tinyhunts saying that the best choice is to lump a scumread.

Are you just claiming that "anyone who doesn't claim their reasoning right away is using it to better position themselves later." Even though you know my whole style is about providing information at the right time and avoiding contamination.

Tlr
What
Are you scum?
Etc

 

It's reversed since then, but am still using this idea for figuring out tom atm

--- Post automerged ---
Lynch Vote: Shadow

 

Uh, no, I slapped you around for townreading him.
--- Post automerged ---
Lump: Newcomb

Let's do this.
--- Post automerged ---
Sidenote: Emojis are terrible.

 

I have thoughts on this that I'm going to avoid talking about until later because reasons, but I had Newcomb as a weak/questionmark-y townread, not scumread.
--- Post automerged ---

Fucking mindmeld, ok.

Lump: Newcomb

 

Bruh.

 

That reminds me: Cobalt a. I had him as null, b. He's voting where I'm voting, don't phrase it like I'm following him around, c.mafia bus and d. I don't take a scumread on one person and then base the rest of my reads off of it like a moron.
--- Post automerged ---

I had a moment where I was going to ask you to explain the vote, heh.

Why so late to the party, Waco?

 

Just got home from work a little while ago.

 

Gemma, the salt thing is a total read. I, humm, think Jari tends to get alignment reads in weird ways that seem to ignore a lot of the context then stick to them, regardless of alignment. Tbh, I forgot your reasoning there because I dismissed it as unlikely pretty quickly.
--- Post automerged ---

Fair. I'm mostly wondering why you weren't voting before me. That seems more your style.

 

*Lynch*
Shadowlancer (4): fontisian, Newcomb, Gemma, The Waco Kid
Fontisian (3): vaimes, cobalt, tom
Newcomb (2): Delphine, Jarizok
Delphine (2): mallorean_thug, dichotomousCreator
Waco kid (1): shadowlancer

Abstaining (1): Jan

~Lump~
tom (4): tom, shadowlancerx, Newcomb, Vaimes
Newcomb (3): mallorean_thug, fontisian, Gemma
Jarizok (3): dichotomousCreator, Jarizok, cobalt
The Waco Kid (2): The Waco Kid, Delphine
Gemma (1): Jan

Abstaining (0):

 

Babe, talk about your Newcomb thoughts?

 

Would super appreciate not being called a moron, thanks.

 

Are you ever actually going to /do/ something with your vote, Tom, or are you just trying to secure lump?
--- Post automerged ---

Wasn't calling you one. My point it you're treating me like I am one.

 

Lynch Newcomb
Lump Tom

I want those wagons where I want them.

 

tom GOAT. Dont lump.

 

Shhh
It's working.

 

Oh. Didn’t read that way.

And I’m not treating you like a moron, I’m treating you like you’re one of my top scum reads and I’m not really buying any of what you’re selling. There’s a huge difference.
--- Post automerged ---
I don’t want Newcomb lumped. I want Newcomb lynched.

 

fonti can explain at some point if she wants to. I thought Waco's reasoning was pretty bad, yeah. I don't think it means he has to be mafia and I don't think his reasoning being bad means anything in particular about shadow's alignment. I'm not just blindly sheeping her, I thought her reasoning re: shadow's focus being narrow was good and I don't really townread him, so.

 

Please.