Yes? 'I' what?

I mean? Dat casual shade. Did I really exaggerate? Also, nothing to say about my rundown on Vaimes?

 

So the tiny hut game told me that Gemma has apparently gotten over her complete aversion to voting her partner, though she still doesn't like to scum read them. And the vote on her partner might have been more at following fonti's case than an actual bus/distance vote. Also, I shouldn't read her based on not sounding miserable in thread because she didn't sound miserable there in thread.

I still think that the interaction with "you" and Gemma seems more likely to be not partnery, but my thought that it wasn't because Gemma voted "you" isn't as valid as I thought before.

I just basically skimmed that iso checking for those two things. Also, Vaimes does not sound wooden as scum, but still might have the petering out as the game goes on thing. I skimmed even less of his iso, mostly just looking at tonal things. I don't plan to do actual metaing unless it becomes necessary.

 

What on earth do you mean by no buildup? I said I didn't like "you" doing nothing but arguing with Gemma, in that very post no less. So your apparent "first scumread" is entirely based on not reading the post you based it on. For those of you playing along at home, this is what we refer to as "not a good loog"

Also fluff saying zen is locktown is fluff being fluff. I'm not falling for the "lynch town!fluff for being weird" meme again thanks.
--- Post automerged ---

My new playstyle is "lazy town" (1 like = 1 prayer for Stefan Karl) which basically means yes I could have gone back and reread to confirm but I am lazy.

 

Hmm.

Currently I feel like I want to Vote You

 

...I

I spelled it "not a good loog"

lulz, if you're scum, I won't lynch you if you promise to kill me overnight and put me out of my misery.

 

Man I haven't heard Farside mentioned in a long time. Do we know each other?

I don't think much of Zen's read on Fluff right now. What I do think is that Fluff is an easy target, and though Gemma said she won't actively fight a lynch on Fluff day one, I probably would unless I legitimately thought he was scum or just have no reads whatsoever. My one experience with fluff is that he doesn't do much early game and it gets him scumread which makes him an easy target. But he seems perceptive enough and has a good head for figuring things out as the game progresses though his lack of doing anything makes him easy to ignore and lynch anyway. That's how it played out in the game I replaced into last year.

i'm still in a decent bit of observation mode and my most interesting thing to figure out are the alignments of Gemma/"you"/Vaimes.

 

Dem selective edits though...

Vote:Zenzao

 

hey look lulz is quietly slinking away from his terrible scumread on me!

What's the matter, rice cakes too spicy for you?

Vote: lulz

(I would like today's wagons to be lulz and "you" at this time. Vaimes can have another day to attempt to amuse me.)
--- Post automerged ---
wait fuck I don't have my rice cake avatar on this forum

one second, please

 

I stopped scumreading you? Pics or it never happened.

 

ok so I copied it from MU and it looks like shit but whatever.
--- Post automerged ---

You moved on from the vote way too quickly for my taste. What were you hoping to accomplish with it beyond signaling that you have a dC scumread that is totally a real read you guys?

 

I'm sorry, I thought I'd cut out the rest of the bullshit and highlight where I feel your 180 comes into play and call you out for saying I was exaggerating.

Dear merciful heavens, use a different color that isn't so eyesearingly bad.

 

So your reason for your vote is non-existent and you're retroactively trying to justify it. Because lets face it...everyone knows there aren't two votes in this game. Your "he's slinking away from his scumread" is made up.

 

Could you explain what you mean by this post?

 

Nope. You changed the vote without commenting on why your new vote is preferable to you compared to the old one or saying anything that suggests the old one still exists at all. That's slinking, buddy.

 

DICHO says I reversed my scumread when I voted somewhere else.

How many votes are YOU able to have in this game, cuz I only have one.

So his claim that I'm slinking away from a scumread is inherently false and he uses this false information to justify a vote. His read on me is phone.

 

I didn't say you reversed it, I said you stopped chasing it.

 

This is a made up reason.

First you said I was slinking away from my scumread on you, now you're saying I didn't give a good reason for the vote switch.

You're moving the goalposts because you're vote on me was garbage and you're forced to backpedal.

 

I have a bit of a headache and this is definitely not helping.

Lulz I don't follow the point you're making in this post here: WoW Mafia Game Thread

It looks like you're suggesting that he's misquoting you or taking your words out of context, but in the post where you talk about him losing some points due to be apologetic about tryharding, you do end with having him at an overall net gain.

So what's the point you're making?

 

What do you think slinking away from a scumread means? It means pretty much exactly not giving a good reason for switching your vote off it.

 

Dude, you're caught lying.