1. DLP Flash Christmas Competition + Writing Marathon 2024!

    Competition topic: Magical New Year!

    Marathon goal? Crank out words!

    Check the marathon thread or competition thread for details.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hi there, Guest

    Only registered users can really experience what DLP has to offer. Many forums are only accessible if you have an account. Why don't you register?
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Introducing for your Perusing Pleasure

    New Thread Thursday
    +
    Shit Post Sunday

    READ ME
    Dismiss Notice

Wizards v. Muggles Megathread

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Xiph0, Mar 7, 2016.

  1. Rakkety Tam

    Rakkety Tam High Inquisitor

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2011
    Messages:
    513
    I think I'd also add that we don't really see wizards ever run out of energy so the idea of too much energy doesn't even make sense. In GoF, Harry spends basically an entire day casting the summoning charm. He starts sometime before lunch, skips lunch to keep practicing, and even when he stops to go to class he is still summoning things under the table during class before having a short dinner and resuming practice until 2am. He is consistently getting better at the charm throughout.

    I think maybe the idea comes from the fact that charms tend to wear off of objects over time, but look at how long those charms last. You are talking wearing out over years in many of the objects we see. Think of a broom and how much use it gets vs how long those charms last. You'd run out of bullets and bombs before that shield charm wears out.
     
  2. AutumnSouls

    AutumnSouls Squib

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2020
    Messages:
    16
    Location:
    North America
    Yeah, it destroys the whole kinetic energy argument. Conjuring even a single glass of water would require the energy of numerous nukes. And even Hagrid can conjure enough water to put out a house fire.
     
  3. Newcomb

    Newcomb Minister of Magic

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2013
    Messages:
    1,246
    Location:
    The Evergreen State
    I'm very, very on the wizard side in this whole debate, but I've always thought that conjuration wasn't exactly pulling from literally nothing, but pulling from a kind of... aether, in the classical sense.

    I remember a line from DH, when McGonagall has to answer the Ravenclaw common room riddle, which was "where do Vanished objects go?" Her answer - "into non-being, which is to say, everything."
     
  4. aAlouda

    aAlouda High Inquisitor

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2019
    Messages:
    534
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Germany
    Even if you were assuming that, there are also spells like engorgio, geminio and transfiguration spells that clearly make there be quite a bit more mass than there was before.
     
  5. Sauce Bauss

    Sauce Bauss Second Year ~ Prestige ~ DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    61
    High Score:
    1411
    The whole premise of conjuration being the creation of matter in that sense is locking yourself into a paradigm of the mechanical instead of conceptual. Quite muggle of you.
     
  6. AutumnSouls

    AutumnSouls Squib

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2020
    Messages:
    16
    Location:
    North America
    The whole point was that if we looked at it that way, wizards would still be superior.
     
  7. Rakkety Tam

    Rakkety Tam High Inquisitor

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2011
    Messages:
    513
    I think that's because if you look at it as conceptual then the muggles have no chance. Physics would have zero effect on magic.
     
  8. Download

    Download Auror ~ Prestige ~ DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    640
    Location:
    Adelaide, Australia
    High Score:
    1918
    Except the argument being made is mechanical, that wizards could only block a certain amount of bullets/explosions because of energy. If they are making that argument then the argument that magic is creating matter out of nothing can also be made to disprove it.
     
Loading...