Well Lion had three nights to investigate. His last post mentions Ashaya and Berkeley to be innocent and Aekiel to be guilty.

However, it's hard to tell if he was calling out Aekiel having investigated him or just because Aekiel was so focused on getting Lion killed.

I have a feeling this whole thing is going to blow up on us, and that Minion or someone is trying to pull strings and get Aekiel killed when he shouldn't be. But then again, I have that feeling about everyone who posts anything in this thread.

So. Vote Player: Aekiel.

 

I think it's the only chance we have right now. Lutris said it - we are fucked. What else shall we do?

 

Yes, and we all know how this story ends. Everyone bandwagons, and another innocent is killed.

But this is clever coming from you, considering you've only posted 4 times total for this game, and failed to vote twice. You got something to hide? I've said it before, but I think we should take a look at all the lurkers. It would be hard to accuse you of anything, because like I said, you haven't done anything. And that in itself is suspicious.

So I'm going to Vote Player: Riley Poole because I don't actually think you're guilty, nor Aekiel.

 

Vote Player: Aekiel

Reading Lion's post again it seems that he did not actually check Aekiel but had a suspicion. This vote is just to make sure we make some progress.

EDIT : inb4; progress for progress's sake must be discouraged.

 

At the risk of just setting myself up to be killed during the night phase, I'm going to tell you all what I am. I am the healer, and I protected Lutris two nights previously from being murdered by Death Eaters. That is why I am sure of his innocence, though Castiel (previously DarkDeoxys) was not on my suspect list.

My suspect pool at the moment is down to Kang, Rehio, Dark Minion and Lord Anarchy. That said, my suspect pool hasn't been the most accurate as of late, so take from that what you will.

 

Lutris: Can you confirm or deny this?

 

I can confirm that I was attacked on Night 3, and was protected by a Healer.

Of course, this testimony of mine only further increases the risk of Aekiel being targeted by Death Eaters tonight, and me soon after, regardless of what role I'm assigned. I hope the rest of Hogsmeade can make good use of this. We have 11 people left. With Aekiel and I gone, that'll soon be 9, and we'll need every vote we can get to beat the Death Eaters.

We're already down an Auror, an Order Member, and soon, probably a Healer. We need to unite if we're going to beat this Dark Lord.

 

Rescind Vote.

Welp. Back to figuring out this shit, I guess.

 

So - either both are Death Eaters, or Aekiel is indeed the Healer.

I rescind my vote.

 

That's still three confirmed non-Death Eaters amongst us though, so all is not lost. That leaves eight people as suspects. The question we must now ask is how many amongst us are Death Eaters in disguise, and is the Dark Lord or his pet sorcerer hiding in the shadows? Hell, Lion could even have been wrong about Ashaya, given that the Dark Lord's magicks would confound even the most talented of Aurors.

Still, it does not benefit us at this stage to cast doubt on Lion's investigations, so we must assume for the moment that Ashaya is not a Dark Lady and is, in fact, innocent of any wrongdoing.

 

Did you, as Healer, ever visit DarkDeox - err - Castiel? He said he was visited twice, and Lion wouldn't have checked upon him twice.

 

Edit: Never mind, confusion

Rescind Vote

for now.

 

I am so confused right now.

Edit: For what its worth im just a standard wizard and my voting has been straight forward. My pool of suspects is between Rehio and Dark Minion.

So imma take the plunge and Vote Player: Rehio

 

Am I missing something here?

• Someone attacks Lutris.
• He was protected.

Three people would know of this. The attacker. The Healer. And the victim.

Why did we (read: You guys) assume that the person who told us about it was the healer and NOT THE ATTACKER?

I went back and read on the rules. A healer can protect someone for a night, but do they get to know if the person was actually attacked or not? If they don't, then we have conclusive proof that Aekiel is a Death Eater because then the Death Eaters are the only ones who would know of the attack on Lutris.

In that scenario there must be another healer who protected Lutris. If this is true, he should come forward I guess?

Although of course, Lutris and Aekiel could be working together so...

Not convinced.

My vote stands.

EDIT:

So, I reread the rules.

The Dark Lord Lady can fool the Auror(s).

I still maintain Ashaya is the Dark Lady.

 

I have yet to see anyone give a real reason for suspecting Ashaya.

 

I did get informed, I was hiding in the bushes after all. >_>

 

Here's what I know. I'm innocent. I was attacked, and a healer saved me.

Even if Aekiel didn't know who was attacked that night, it'll be pretty apparent the next Day phase, you know. If nobody died, then he was successful. If somebody else died, he didn't protect the right person.

Simple, no?

I'm just a Wizard, but here's what I think:

The Death Eaters are systematically removing our members, and at the same time sowing discord.

This needs to stop.

Given that we currently have 11 players, and that the Death Eaters must achieve a majority in order to win, it follows that the largest number of Death Eaters possible is 5. If there ARE 5 Death Eaters, then we HAVE to vote one of them dead if we are to survive at all, since they're sure to kill one of our number tonight, leaving us with 9 players tomorrow, and certain death.

Rehio, how's this for reasoning?

Those who're likely for Death Eater candidacy are the ones who 1. Voted Vira on Day 2 to kickstart the next day's Vira bandwagon, and 2. Those who consistently voted for Berkeley, then bandwagoned onto Vira.

These criteria leave Ashaya and Rehio as two MOST likely suspects. Other bandwagoners who broke out of previous patterns are: The Berkeley Hunt (who's not a DE for obvious reasons), and Lion (ditto).

Those who have consistently voted for her are less likely to be Death Eaters. Case in point: I voted Ashaya for Days 1 and 2. I was attacked on Night 3. Xiph0 voted for her Days 1 and 2. He was murdered on Night 2. The Berkeley Hunt voted for her Days 1 and 2. He was murdered Night 4.

The only possible outcomes for Ashaya are that she is either a Witch or a Dark Lady, as we can only have one Auror and one Healer, and we already know who those are/were (Lion and Aekiel(Vash initially) respectively).



Although I realize it will likely increase the risk of them being killed, the next topic I'd like to cover is that of Order Members. We are afforded 2 or 3 Order Members out of 16 players. One is already dead, so we have 1 or 2 left. Given that The Berkeley Hunt was an Order Member and that Order Members know who each other, it follows that those who voted for, and those who were voted by TBH are NOT Order Members.

This leaves either Castiel, Kang, or Havoc as possible Order Members. I'm asking Aekiel to protect one of them tonight. If one of them is attacked tonight, then we'll know that they AREN'T a Death Eater. If the one protected by Aekiel is attacked, then we'll know another innocent player, and can act accordingly. If the one attacked is unprotected, then we know that WHO ONE OF THE DEATH EATERS IS, given that we'll protect the most likely candidate for innocence. If they decide to take out our Healer and attack Aekiel, then we've proven both his and my innocence.

All I ask is that we agree to vote on someone who is not one of these 5 (including me) members, and have them Kissed. This will show the innocence of at least three members (me, Aekiel, and an order member), and if we manage to vote out a Death Eater, then good for us. I'm firmly behind voting for Ashaya, as I believe she is the Dark Lady among us.

Lastly, even in the case of total failure: If we vote somebody out, and they turn out to be innocent, and the DEs kill another innocent player, but the game still goes on, we'll know there are 4 DEs. If the game ends there, well, we had a good romp.

Castiel (I liked you better when you were a Pokemon, btw), all I ask is that you go back to your first three votes for Ashaya, and cast a vote for her again. I truly believe that she is the Dark Lady, that Rehio is merely voicing her support to trick us, and, here's the kicker: we can't spare any votes right now. Given my above reasoning, you'll know we can demonstrate that 1. Aekiel is indeed the Healer, and 2. Even if he isn't killed tonight, we'll still be able to eliminate another player from our pool of suspects.

Everyone. I implore you: vote for Ashaya tonight.

Vote Player: Ashaya

 

I'm glad that you all finally came to your senses and didn't vote Aekiel. I thought it was pretty obvious that he is the healer if you just look at his posts and I did my best to divert votes from him
https://forums.darklordpotter.net/showpost.php?p=477605&postcount=134
https://forums.darklordpotter.net/showpost.php?p=477976&postcount=142
https://forums.darklordpotter.net/showpost.php?p=477978&postcount=144
But I don't think coming out and bluntly saying it was the best idea, but who knows?

Also, I still stand by that Havoc is innocent because of a post I made in the very beginning.

I'm sticking with my vote, simply because we have to believe something, and I believe that Lion was honest when he said who was innocent. I think if Aekiel didn't say he was the healer, Ashaya probably would be killed tonight, but like Lutris said, I think the guy signed his own death warrant.

 

There are several scenarios but they are getting more and more unlikely.

Oh, and I am not an order member. Just your average Wizard.

and Rescind Vote.

Vote Player: Ashaya

Let's end this as we started it... Together.(The name change was because my nick is Castiel at almost all other forums/sites now, kinda seemed pointless to keep the old one on DLP.)

 

If I hadn't come out and said it, chances are I would have been Kissed.

And on that note, Vote Player: Ashaya.

I'm thinking this is our last real chance to make a difference. If Ashaya is the Dark Lady, we stand a chance. If not, and our gamble proves false, I foresee only bloodshed and horror in our future.