1. DLP Flash Christmas Competition + Writing Marathon 2024!

    Competition topic: Magical New Year!

    Marathon goal? Crank out words!

    Check the marathon thread or competition thread for details.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hi there, Guest

    Only registered users can really experience what DLP has to offer. Many forums are only accessible if you have an account. Why don't you register?
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Introducing for your Perusing Pleasure

    New Thread Thursday
    +
    Shit Post Sunday

    READ ME
    Dismiss Notice

Grammar Software

Discussion in 'Fanfic Discussion' started by Ched, Apr 26, 2013.

  1. Ched

    Ched Da Trek Moderator DLP Supporter ⭐⭐

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    8,378
    Location:
    The South
    I have no idea what the best place to put this thread is. I considered a few sub-forums before settling on this one, since this is where the Writing Software thread is.

    So do any of you guys use grammar software, which one do you use, and do you find it useful?

    The ones I am vaguely familiar with are: Grammarly, WhiteSmoke, Ginger, After The Deadline, & RightWriter.

    Everything I've heard strongly implies that Grammarly is the best of the bunch, but it requires a log-in when you use it. The log-in requires a monthly payment, and I'm really not interested in that.

    Reviews on the others tend to be very mixed, with WhiteSmoke probably coming in second, but some of the reviews I've run into talk a lot more about spelling and customer service than they do about grammar. I don't really care about spelling.

    Microsoft Word's grammar check isn't ideal, by the way. It's a decent start but it doesn't catch a lot of things and often it catches things it shouldn't. It's good, and a decent start, but I'm just curious if there's a better option out there.

    Anyone have input on this stuff? My grammar is far from great and I was hoping to find some software that would be a little more helpful than Word, but nothing is jumping out at me and yelling "pick me!"
     
  2. Cyrogen

    Cyrogen Second Year

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    66
    I've never found any specific Grammar software that was worthwhile.

    Still on a revision note, you may want to check out Smart Edit, if you're on windows. I use it fairly frequently, the repeated words/phrases function has saved me a ton.

    From their main page:
    That's the only program that I can think of that may be what you're looking for.
     
  3. Ched

    Ched Da Trek Moderator DLP Supporter ⭐⭐

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    8,378
    Location:
    The South
    That looks pretty neat -- do you use the Free Version or the Licensed Version? Or do you keep downloading/re-installing the Free Trial?
     
  4. Cyrogen

    Cyrogen Second Year

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    66
    I've only used the free one.
     
  5. Tommy

    Tommy The Green Ranger

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2012
    Messages:
    202
    Location:
    In a bomb shelter, South Africa.
    I didn't know there was such a thing.

    But yeah, I have to agree with Cheddar on this one. My grammar sucks, especially when it comes to writing things such as:

    Harry said, "So, you mean to tell me that you killed Dobby with a pencil," his eyes darkened, "and that you got away with it?"

    Sentences like that, with the action between the quotes really gets to me, so I think I could use something like that.

    I do, however, use a spelling tool called "Tiny Spell," which sits on your system tray and flags down misspelt words. You click on it, or in my case, hit the shift key an you are presented with choices.

    So something free, something that actually works and something that doesn't moan about licenses and such.
     
  6. Warlocke

    Warlocke Fourth Champion

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2006
    Messages:
    3,053
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The armpit of Ohio
    Hehe. Last time I used a program with a grammar checker, it was Word and it came on a stack of about 8 floppies.

    I wonder if they work any better, now.
     
  7. Marcus Livius Drusus

    Marcus Livius Drusus Banned DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2012
    Messages:
    57
    Gender:
    Male
    You could do it like this: "So," Harry said, "you mean to tell me that you killed Dobby with a pencil." His eyes darkened. "And you got away with it?"

    Or like this: Harry said, "So you mean to tell me that you killed Dobby with a pencil," his eyes darkening. "And you got away with it?

    Lots of ways to do it, but you should not put a sentence between commas.
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2013
  8. Joe's Nemesis

    Joe's Nemesis High Score: 2,058 ~ Prestige ~

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,192
    High Score:
    2,058
    Laughing my ass off . . . no, they don't.


    I've just ended up going into Word and telling it to flag everything, and then take the things that it flags as suggestions, rather than absolutes. Damn thing still can't tell the difference between it's and its.

    First one's okay. The second one is wrong. darkening eyes can't speak. If you want to keep it all one sentence, you can do it like this:

    "So, you mean to tell me that you killed Dobby with a pencil"—his eyes darkened—"and you got away with it?"
     
  9. Joe's Nemesis

    Joe's Nemesis High Score: 2,058 ~ Prestige ~

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,192
    High Score:
    2,058
    I reformatted my computer and was looking to reinstall grammar/editing software when I came across this little gem. http://prowritingaid.com/

    It's pretty robust, analyzing not only grammar and style, but also sentence and paragraph length, pacing of the story (though pacing is somewhat subjective), cliches/redundancies, repeated words/phrases, pronouns, "diction" report, vague/abstract words, complex words, "sticky sentences," Alliteration, consistency (are all uses of "Apparation" capitalized, for instance), and dialogue tags. There's a couple others, but they're not necessarily important to fanfiction/fiction writing.

    Unfortunately, you can only post 1000 words and only a few of the above categories work in the free version, but the full version has a couple options, $30 a year or $120 for lifetime license. Also, if you use Word, there's an add-in that allows you to run the program inside Word (but it's still using the engine on the website, so you have to be connected to the internet, from what I read).

    Also, at least on the internet editor version, you have the option via buttons to check for specific things such as overused words, time references, passives, adverbs, and hidden verbs, and even have it mark patterns of an author.

    I threw in a very rough draft of a story and the report was pretty impressive, even catching echoes through alliteration.
     
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2013
  10. Averis

    Averis Don of Delivery ~ Prestige ~

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2007
    Messages:
    187
    Location:
    North Carolina
    High Score:
    3,065
    Damn. That thing is certainly useful. I copy-pasted about 1,000 words and the program destroyed me. It points out overuse of words (could, had were some of my worst offenders), overuse of adverbs, and offers suggestions as to what should be changed. For example: I used was/were 22 times and they suggested I remove 8 of them.

    It looks like its very easy to use. Good find, E.C. Using this in conjunction with Word would be excellent, but as I use Wordpad, its not that difficult to copy-paste small sections of text five or six times to complete a chapter. Definitely worth a look for any (serious) writers.
     
  11. Ched

    Ched Da Trek Moderator DLP Supporter ⭐⭐

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    8,378
    Location:
    The South
    Looks a lot like Grammarly on the surface -- any idea if one is superior to the other? I'd be willing to drop the cash for it, though in general I tend to prefer buying the software rather than a license. Can't always be helped though.

    I popped one of my TGYH challenges in there (it was about 650 words). I like the report so far, though I am amused that it's biggest criticism is my use of "vague and abstract" words in a Luna POV scene. All in all I had more green than red in my report though, so yay me.

    I popped it into Grammarly as well. It told me it was plaigarized, wtf? I laugh.
     
  12. Joe's Nemesis

    Joe's Nemesis High Score: 2,058 ~ Prestige ~

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,192
    High Score:
    2,058
    That's hilarious! I wonder, do you have it posted somewhere? Maybe it picked it up and compared it.

    I haven't seen Grammarly. I may have to pop over to the website and check it out. Do you have any idea how Grammarly works with academic papers? I'd be interested to know.

    And I agree about license vs. software, especially when you don't know if/when the company is going out of business, but it is what it is, I guess.
     
  13. Ched

    Ched Da Trek Moderator DLP Supporter ⭐⭐

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    8,378
    Location:
    The South
    The only place it's been posted is DLP at present, in the TGYH thread (I know WbA is password protected so doesn't search, but not sure about that thread).

    Unless someone else stole it from me and put it up somewhere. ROFL.

    Some schools have licenses for it and I know of one person who swears by it for academia, but I haven't used it myself.

    Mhm, yeah pretty much. Also I had a license for something that ran on Windows 2000 that no longer works well with newer versions of Windows. They did upgrade the software but I'd rather use it on the old XP machine in the lab, etc. Not an issue for most modern software, but still a thing.

    EDIT ...on another note, I put in some writing of mine from last year and it ended up with loads more issues/problems/RED than my more recent TYGH challenge, even though I spent less time writing the more recent story. I am going to take that to mean I've improved, and damn anyone who says otherwise.
     
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2013
  14. IdSayWhyNot

    IdSayWhyNot Minister of Magic DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,281
    Gave it a try. Seems to work well. My only complaint is that all those functions you guys mention also include dialogue. So of course I have adverbs and was and were and clichéd lines and even spelling 'mistakes'.

    I don't think it'd be that challenging to omit instances where dialogue tags are used. That's all I'd add to it.
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2013
  15. Joe's Nemesis

    Joe's Nemesis High Score: 2,058 ~ Prestige ~

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,192
    High Score:
    2,058
    I think I read that if you buy the license, you can exclude dialogue. I just bought it and am waiting for the confirmation emails, but I have other things I need to do now and can't mess with it at the moment. I'll get back to you later tonight about whether you can or can't exclude dialogue.
     
  16. Ched

    Ched Da Trek Moderator DLP Supporter ⭐⭐

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    8,378
    Location:
    The South
    Uhm. Is the software sarcastic? Because I put in a piece of work that has several adverbs ending in -ly (something I generally try to avoid), and every time the software finds one it says:

    -ly adverb. Nice job

    ...nice job? I laughed out loud for real about the fifth time I saw that. I think maybe it's suggesting "nice job" as a thing to replace it with, but that makes no sense.

    Edit: E. C. Scrubb...
    Once you buy it are you willing to let some of us give it a test run via you? Assuming it could work that way. I know it said you can install it into Word, so after it does a markup I wonder if you can save it marked up? I'm curious what it would say about my work before I decide to buy... but I need something, and this seems better than Grammarly (and at least you can test it without signing up for a "Free Trial").
     
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2013
  17. IdSayWhyNot

    IdSayWhyNot Minister of Magic DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,281
    I think it says nice job if you have a sufficiently low number of adverbs proportional to the length of the text. Or is it telling you nice job in each specific instance of an adverb in the text?
     
  18. BitMyFinger

    BitMyFinger Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2013
    Messages:
    344
    Location:
    Deep in the Heart
    Just thought I'd say that signing up allowed me to put in a 2395 word doc (not sure if it has a limit). Didn't cost money or anything, and I used my google account so really just pressing a button. But thank you E.C. Scrubb for this find, and hopefully I can become a better writer.
     
  19. Joe's Nemesis

    Joe's Nemesis High Score: 2,058 ~ Prestige ~

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,192
    High Score:
    2,058
    Cheddar . . . I make it a habit not to give out personal info, even things like codes. However, since I'm not willing to do that, I tried to do the next best thing and give you a walkthrough of the entire program in Word: with pictures.

    (I'll go step by step in case others who aren't that computer literate are reading, so it may be pedantic, I apologize).
    ______________________

    So, to start out with, here is the way it sets up in Word. On the top right you see the add-in for Pro-Write. above "a" you see the button to search the text. Just below that, however, is the type of text you've designated. You get the choice of Professional, Creative, Academic, etc. It's a nice little feature, as it sets some general parameters for the searches. To the right of that is the settings menu (where I've written "b" though rather poorly).

    The settings window looks like this. Yeah, pretty basic, at least for the connection tab at the top. The next tab is the Reports tab. I like the fact that you can choose the reports, but what I really like is the "House Style" report. You can choose your own things to search for in House Style Report by programming it in the Patterns tab. Here, I've set it so that all apostrophes are marked. This way, I can check to make sure that I've written all my plural and possessive nouns correctly. The next few are for academic writing, but I may still use it to find all uses of a "Naked This" in my text. Following that tab is the Analysis tab. I've grown to like the structure panel, which, on the first pic, was to the very left. I also like the fact that you can shut off settings in dialogue (though not all of them, like adjectives, unfortunately). The last tab is the Overused Word tab. I haven't messed with it, which is obvious, but it looks pretty solid. I really like the fact that it gives you the ability not only group words together, but then determine how many uses per 1000 is acceptable.

    Back to the main screen, notice the structure panel. As you choose a report, that panel will light up to tell you where each of the occurrences are in the sentence (each bar) and thus, also the paragraph (the purple lines to the side).

    The first report is the "Overused Words" report. Interesting that it gives you a figure of how many to remove. I've yet to find out how they came up with it (how many per 1000 word), but it's a good start, at least.

    The "Writing Style" report is pretty nice, IMO. The one problem is that it counts adverbs in dialogue and I've yet to figure out if it can be turned off, but I don't think it can be. On the other hand, I really like the "Passive Index" at the bottom right to let me know whether those 7 passive verbs I've used are too many or not. Another feature that I really like is the "Repeated Sentence Starts." I was kind of surprised to find three continual sentences all started with "I."

    The following report is the "Grammar Report" Frankly, it's a waste of time, since this part of the report is just for spelling, and I've already taken care of those in the Word software.

    The next one is "Sentence Length." Nothing else much to say.

    "Diction" seems to be what I'd put under grammar, but nevertheless, it's not. Of course, most of this is take it or leave it advice, but that's true of any software.

    "Vague and Abstract Words" Self-identifying, but remember that you can tell it to not check dialogue here.

    Most of the rest of these are self-identifying and I also caught the "report description" at the bottom, so I'll just link the screenshots.

    Cliches and Redundancies
    Pronoun
    Repeat Words and Phrases I really like this one, not just because it highlights the word, but because you can see the color on the structure panel and see how far apart the phrases are.
    Sticky Sentences
    Complex Words
    Alliteration
    NLP Predicates (At first blush, I thought this one wouldn't be that useful in this type of writing. However, thinking about it again, I completely changed my mind. It's nice to be able to see just exactly what kind of sensory/thought words I'm using, how many I'm using, and whether I need to change anything or make it more balanced.
    Consistency Note on this one, the software doesn't distinguish between a word pair used as adjectives that come before a verb from one that comes after, and thus, whether it needs a hyphen or not.
    Pacing
    Dialogue tags
    Acronyms

    _________________

    Working with Scrivener . . .

    Here's the other thing I realized, Scrivener saves as a .txt. So, if Word is your writing software, you can use ProWritingAid on every story you are writing in Scrivener.

    So, if your saving to the document library, go there and find the XXXX.scriv folder. Then files > Docs > click on your document. It'll have a number, so you'll have to click around to make sure you get them all. I haven't messed with changing the names and seeing what happens, my guess is it'll screw the entire file system up.

    Anyway, I do like that you can basically use it with Scrivener, though I hope they'll make it so that you can actually use it in Scrivener at some point.

    EDIT: It has a plugin for WordPress too, if anyone's interested. http://prowritingaid.com/en/App/WordPress
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2013
  20. Ched

    Ched Da Trek Moderator DLP Supporter ⭐⭐

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    8,378
    Location:
    The South
    E. C. Scrubb -- I wasn't asking for your code mate, I meant more along the lines of me sending you a short story and you taking a couple of screenshots for me (or saving the critiqued Word file, but I doubted that would be an option).

    Great review of it though. I picked up a one-year license.

    There seem to be less options for the Word Add-In than there are on the actual website. Or at least I have fewer buttons on the ribbon in Word than there are on the website -- am I missing something or is the Word Add-In just slightly gimped compared to the online Premium Editor?
     
Loading...