Discussion in 'Little Italy' started by Zeitgeist, Mar 1, 2014.
Oh fuck no.
Lynch vote: Ika
Ika, then give me an opinion to engage with. I can't engage the darkness or an RNG.
Fonti, I am terrible with jokes on the internet. Bleh.
---------- Post automerged at 11:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:06 AM ----------
Ok I got another for ika.
Lynch vote ika
Titus: You know I want reasons after Ika responds.
Reasons for the vote on ika. I want him settled and you explained the joke I didn't get.
Our baggage goes back a year plus. Don't want to make a mistake in the endgame bc ika usually reads scummy to me.
---------- Post automerged at 11:15 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:15 AM ----------
I gtg to lunch bbl.
... wow are Ika and Titus actually a scum team
that post made me laugh
note to self: to get fontisian attention/piss her off. misspell name...
im careless with my grammer and often dont check it jsyk
I was thinking of giving yuo a random emoticon for humor but decided to be more serious.
Random question: have you ever seen "legend of kora"? maybe random questions will find a way for us to engadge while we wait for others.
@Bill Door, then help me bus.
Bill would you like to contibute or just be usless? Thats what im seeing so far. pointless side commentary
FYI she really enjoys it when you get her confused with a guy
Titus, a) where do you think my vote is atm, b) why are you trying to run up a legit train like 2 hours into day 1?
---------- Post automerged at 07:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:22 PM ----------
Okay either Titus and Ika are both scum or one of them is scum and trying super hard to make it look like the other is too. Cuz this is reading like some hardcore early distancing.
This is some fun info to have I will use it.
I might be able to answer B though, titus and i have a history (as mentioned) and she is afraid of the skills i have. There was a discussion a while back on how she actual fears my scum hunting skills against her.
Think of it like this:
Titus strong point is logic and deduction.
My strong point is being able to ignore logic and merely find scums using my own means.
---------- Post automerged at 03:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:33 PM ----------
p-edit: i will be direct and blunt to get the info i need. if you are jsut going to be side commentator (like you were earlier) be prepared to be called out on it. there are times for jokes and theres time to be serious. and right now your jokes are not needed here
That only answers why it's you, not why she's doing it.
Also, this game is not previous games. Stop playing it like it is. Ika and Titus have both gone full meta so far, that ain't good.
---------- Post automerged at 07:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:37 PM ----------
I will makes jokes if I want to. 2 hours into day 1 is not the time to go full serious, this is the time to get the jokes out of the way.
Tbh, you complainging about me making jokes would normally make me do them more, but Ikan't be bothered.
also thing of info: i tend to spam many short post at times so if you see a bunch of auto-merge dont be surprised.
i started the 1v1 with titus early on to get things moving and your you just sidelneing it gives me intrest. why did you decide to just spectate and not really give any real comments until i poked you about it
---------- Post automerged at 03:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:40 PM ----------
im all for jokes as well, but i rather get straight down to business then wasting time with jokes right now.
but you have given me the info i wanted.
My only post between you saying you wanted to 1v1 Titus and you calling me out for not making substantive posts was to say that I think you and Titus are both scum. How does that not count as a real comment and how am I sidlineing?
Keep pushing it. I dare you.
Deadline vote: Titus
Explain why you responded to my question before ika responded to your vote, what you mean by you wanting ika "settled," and how you are trying to achieve that goal.
That's Lord fontisian to you.
Vote Bill Door
This is not an RVS vote.
Hey Proph, how many games are we going to go through the dance where you naked vote someone and I have to wait for your reasoning?
Sloth: I saw you lurking, man. Care to join the party?
I only do it for [REDACTED]. Whenever I naked vote, always expect me to explain my reasoning soon.
You clearly have a problem with Bill Door. If so, they why is your vote still on Titus?
And, as usual, I'll hold you to that.
---------- Post automerged at 03:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:56 PM ----------
I'm kind of wondering what the [redacted] is, though.
Separate names with a comma.