DLP : Criticisms

Paravon · Oct 28, 2008

Using DLP names can get ...interesting (Read: accurate) results.

Let me begin this letter with a few simple statements of fact. First fact: It is both frustrating and frightening to observe the extreme ignorance -- no, idiocy -- present in Mr. Logrusmage's brazen announcements. Second fact: By working together, we can build a world overflowing with compassion and tolerance. Third fact: It would be hard to find anyone who doesn't agree that no one can be right all of the time. These three facts bear repeating over and over again. They are simple and self-evident but it is easy to forget them in the blizzard of lies and obfuscation coming from Mr. Logrusmage and his helots these days. Here's the story: This is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact.

To put it crudely, Mr. Logrusmage says that we should derive moral guidance from his glitzy, multi-culti, hip-hop, consumption-oriented contrivances. That's a stupid thing to say. It's like saying that the sky is falling. Regardless of the theoretical beauty of the notion that he owns drawers and boxes full of legal documents, which he is convinced prove his position, there is the opposing fact that behind the amazing degeneracy of the modern stage and motion picture is a solid wall of Marxism with his name written all over it. In view of that, it is not surprising that I defy the unpatriotic, self-indulgent big-mouths who restructure the social, political, and economic relationships that exist throughout our entire society and I defy the powers of darkness that they represent. Despite what you may have been taught in school, if you looked up "jejune" in the dictionary, you'd probably see Mr. Logrusmage's picture. There is no place in this country where we are safe from Mr. Logrusmage's loyalists, no place where we are not targeted for hatred and attack. Does Mr. Logrusmage do research before he reports things, or does he just guess and hope he's right? The reason I ask is that Mr. Logrusmage should clarify his point so people like you and me can tell what the heck he's talking about. Without clarification, Mr. Logrusmage's declamations sound lofty and include some emotionally charged words but don't really seem to make any sense.

Mr. Logrusmage likes to seem smarter than he really is. It therefore always amuses me whenever he cracks open a thesaurus, aims for intellectualism, misses, and lands squarely in a puddle of jealous frippery. In the end, the most telling thing is that he is doing everything in his power to make me wind up in a straitjacket and locked in a padded cell. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. Mr. Logrusmage has already begun turning moochers loose against us good citizens. I wish I were joking but I'm not. What's more, such conduct as Mr. Logrusmage's induced the despotism of Cromwell and the two Bonapartes. Of course, this sounds simple, but in reality, the real issue is simple: He confers exclusive benignity to feudalism.

As far as being brutish is concerned, none of Mr. Logrusmage's myrmidons holds a candle to him. But it doesn't stop there. The problem as I see it is not a question of who the fugitives of this society are but rather that I strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this, but Mr. Logrusmage's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that documents written by his sympathizers typically include the line, "A richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem", in large, 30-point type, as if the size of the font gives weight to the words. In reality, all that that fancy formatting really does is underscore the fact that Mr. Logrusmage has come up with proven methods to harm others or even instill the fear of harm. All you have to do is let your guard down.

Given Mr. Logrusmage's current mind-set, by Mr. Logrusmage's standards, if you have morals, believe that character counts, and actually raise your own children -- let alone teach them to be morally fit -- you're definitely a disrespectful dummkopf. My standards -- and I suspect yours as well -- are quite different from his. For instance, I claim that if Mr. Logrusmage were to use more accessible language then a larger number of people would be able to understand what he's saying. The downside for Mr. Logrusmage, of course, is that a larger number of people would also understand that if he were to promulgate partisan prejudice against others, social upheaval and violence would follow. It is therefore clear that I once overheard Mr. Logrusmage say something quite astonishing. Are you strapped in? Mr. Logrusmage said that it is not only acceptable but indeed desirable to tear down all theoretical frameworks for addressing the issue. Can you believe that? At least his statement made me realize that his unedifying preoccupation with nepotism will spread officious views one of these days. That said, let me continue.

It is similarly noteworthy that Mr. Logrusmage contends that causing riots in the streets is essential for the safety and welfare of the public and that, therefore, profits come before people. This bizarre pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. For example, it convinces sinful pedants (as distinct from the xenophobic energumens who prefer to chirrup while hopping from cloud to cloud in Nephelococcygia) that newspapers should report only on items Mr. Logrusmage agrees with. In reality, contrariwise, if Mr. Logrusmage had his way, schools would teach students that he commands an army of robots that live in the hollow center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like shaking things up a bit on the surface. This is not education but indoctrination. It prevents students from learning about how if you were to ask Mr. Logrusmage, he'd say that he doesn't remember making my blood curdle. Not only does Mr. Logrusmage surely have a very selective memory, but you shouldn't let him intimidate you. You shouldn't let him push you around. We're the ones who are right, not Mr. Logrusmage.

Although I respect Mr. Logrusmage's right to free speech just as I respect it for cocky lie-virtuosi, gloomy nutcases, and unconscionable, money-grubbing polemics, I can decidedly suggest how he ought to behave. Ultimately, however, the burden of acting with moral rectitude lies with Mr. Logrusmage himself. Irrationalism is irrelevant here. The reason is simple: By plaguing our minds, Mr. Logrusmage has erected a monument to classism. Only it does not seem proper to say that such a thing has been "created". "Excreted", "belched", "spewed", and "spat out" are expressions more appropriate to the object here described. You see, if Mr. Logrusmage thinks that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior, then he's sadly mistaken. I think I am not alone when I say that he wants to shake belief in all existing institutions through the systematic perversion of both contemporary and historical facts. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is Mr. Logrusmage's gossamer grasp of reality.

Think about it. Mr. Logrusmage is leading us down a slippery slope of economic strife, social turmoil, cultural chaos, and homicidal antinomianism. Mr. Logrusmage and his subversive faithfuls must laugh about this in private, knowing that Mr. Logrusmage hates people who have huge supplies of the things he lacks. What he lacks the most is common sense, which underlies my point that I need your help if I'm ever to search for solutions that are more creative and constructive than the typically addlepated ones championed by the worst sorts of self-satisfied despots there are. "But I'm only one person," you might protest. "What difference can I make?" The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, whenever anyone states the obvious -- that Mr. Logrusmage should reserve his stereotypes and labels and remember to treat others with a bit more respect and equality -- discussion naturally progresses towards the question, "Why does Mr. Logrusmage insist on boring holes in the hull of the boat in which he himself is also a passenger?" I apologize if this disappoints you but my intent was only to elucidate the question, not to answer it. I shall therefore state only that when I hear Mr. Logrusmage's agents provocateurs parrot the party line -- that the world can be happy only when Mr. Logrusmage's Praetorian Guard is given full rein -- I see them not as people but as machines. The appropriate noises are coming out of their larynges, but their brains are not involved as they would be if they were thinking about how Mr. Logrusmage is guilty of at least one criminal offense. In addition, he frequently exhibits less formal criminal behavior such as deliberate and even gleeful cruelty, explosive behavior, and a burning desire to desecrate religious objects.

Do we not, as rational men and women, owe it to both our heritage and our posterity to condemn Mr. Logrusmage's criminal ineptitude? I, for one, think we do. Mr. Logrusmage's analects use a philosophical device of asking one question, answering an utterly different question, and then applying that answer to the original question. This applies first and foremost to a lynch mob under whose craven brand of libertinism the whole of honest humanity is suffering: Mr. Logrusmage's army of homophobic vulgarians. Wherever you look, you'll see Mr. Logrusmage enforcing intolerance in the name of tolerance. You'll see him suppressing freedom in the name of freedom. And you'll see him crushing diversity of opinion in the name of diversity.

Although chimpanzees can be convinced to wear clothing, understand commands, and even ride bicycles (if well paid for their services in bananas), it would be virtually impossible to convince Mr. Logrusmage that he is willing to promote truth and justice when it's convenient. But when it threatens his creature comforts, he throws principle to the wind. We can no longer afford to do nothing about his warped litanies. Instead, we must strike while the iron is hot and champion the force of goodness against the greed of cynical charlatans. My current plan is to strip the unjust power from those who seek power over others and over nature. Yes, he will draw upon the most powerful fires of Hell to tear that plan asunder, but if we don't soon tell him to stop what he's doing, he will proceed with his immoral, blathering manuscripts, considerably emboldened by our lack of resistance. We will have tacitly given him our permission to do so. In closing, although this letter has been lengthy there are still a large number of comments about Mr. Logrusmage that I have had to leave aside. I didn't even begin to mention, for instance, that Mr. Logrusmage shows a complete lack of foresight. Anyway, the important point is that Mr. Logrusmage uses a lot of fast patter and sleight of hand to persuade people that everyone and everything discriminates against him -- including the writing on the bathroom stalls.
Click to expand...

SerDel · Nov 25, 2008

That does reminds me of a piece of weird joke that was in my literature book in highscool. You see, I live in Poland, and as many of you know, until recently (until 1990) we had a communism here. Well, enought said it was a flawed system, with a lot of bribes and social injustice. There was a characteristing theme - most of politicians made a very long speeches how we are perfect society, with a lot of goods. Those speeches were really boring then. In my book was a print of sheet of paper (probaly a joke of some smart guy), that was similar to this website. The whole speech was spliced in 5 parts, with beginning, end and fill up. And there were blocks of text, which meant practicaly the same (e.x. five different worded begginings). You could just select one begining, and different fill-ups, with an ending and it was gramatically correct, and had a sense even (though it was really boring ). Someone counted that you could do about 700 different speaches with one sheet of paper. Freaky

DLP Flash Christmas Competition + Writing Marathon 2024!

Hi there, Guest

DLP : Criticisms

Paravon Seventh Year

SerDel Third Year

DLP Flash Christmas Competition + Writing Marathon 2024!

Hi there, Guest

DLP : Criticisms

Paravon Seventh Year

SerDel Third Year

Useful Searches