...ah crap. this post is a mess.
I meant to @Rubicon
not waco lol.

 

I have great news

 

v flip

 

Not feeling hope
Not pushing waco who i still think is town
Everyone vote him anyway

 

Who's mafia, if you can't get Amy today who do /you/ want to yeet?

 

Right i was gonna act frozen
Shit

 

Fair enough.

What is Waco saying there, then? What does he want us to take note of, that is relevant to his read on Vaimes/Cuth? I don't follow the point.

Not to move the goalposts, but I think the points you disagreed with are the least important parts of my posts, so. Would you be open to yeeting Waco today in case of possible Waco/Amy worlds?

 

Spoiler: Vaimes Case

Vaimes posts:

290 is odd in Vaimes/Cuth/tom worlds

Incidentally the light non w/w read I had on Vaimes/JarizokTer was they were the two stuck on my Wagon EoD1.

132/134 self concious
288 finally found it! Feels a lot like Vaimes kinda felt CFTWR, like that time Newcomb caught him in that hunt because of the wording of his RVS post. It shows the fragile/self consciousness that Vaimes always has as scum.
348/350 Never votes wisps but scum reads him here Continues in that vein for a few posts before
375 Points out missing Akina
648 Defends Wisp for a few posts starting here
677/8 Criticizes Cobalt for voting tom over wisp
727 Vaimes hedging on all wagons, all of whom would have to be town in scum!Vaimes worlds.
984-88 The Fonti scum read just doesn't feel like something he's invested in.
1739 Votes Cuth
1847 Vaimes sets up for not being around at EoD
1932 Vaimes makes town/scum core comments
1940 Vaimes doubcasting town core.
1975 Shades Cobalt (Attempt to restart wagon?)
2020 reverse on Cobalt
2027 Shows the turn is because Cobalt is scum reading Jari (Building Jari momentum even though Vaimes is still on Cuth?)
2035 Votes Jari seconds after tom (coordinated, or TWtbW?) Is Vote that makes Jari lead wagon
2043 Vaimes again has a self conscious moment
2056 Says he's leaning on Cobalt reasoning for his vote (trying to hedge)
2087 Vaimes speculates w!Cuth w!Jari as wagons firm up (Isn't this the same thing Fontisian is calling me scum for... Hmmmm)

tom team
677/8 Criticizes Cobalt for voting tom over wisp
1078 "Don't disagree there's scum in tom/Ter but then 1079 I have a mild towered on tom
1329 tom is town with no further update
1336 Telling Reg that tom and maybe Cuth should be removed from POE
2249
2255

Amy team
EoD1
817 pushes against Amy scum read/wagon.

Cuth
312
329 defends Cuth from Wisp
341: Cuth less performative
937
Spends a lot of time of Gemma wondering why Cuth should have been NK
1331 Props up Cuth on little actual things
1332 And again, but hedges it
1336

Apologies for the lack of links/quotes in this. Is the culmination of a series of notes I started D2

 

...hrm.

Dels doesn't openly sheep a desperate tinfoil made by his partner, right? I feel like that's not in his wolf playbook; furthermore I think it's just a weirdly blatant line for wolfbros to take here in general.

Cobalt's post is lol. I don't think w!Cobalt is completely out of the question here.

Fonti/Gemma are fine, this is probably even more townpoints for them.

 

I honestly don't know. Also, I'm not particularly gunning for Amy.

 

Yeah I think my PoE is like exactly Waco/Cobalt. Think I'd even go Dels before I went Rubi at this point just off the interactions, though I think Dels is v for behavioral reasons.

Not sure how productive reading into Cuth's D3 would be for antispew reasons, but I could probably give it a glance since it oughta be short.

 

Look, it doesn't matter if you think Waco is town, he's in the yeet pool. If we aren't 100% on tom being scum, we lose nothing by yeeting Waco.

 

Like, I haven't spent any energy this dayphase thinking about who I would want to yeet outside of the claims because it's been so locked.

 

This.

We have enough freebies that dunking someone in the non-tom PoE is prooobably optimal play even though my ego really wants tom here lmao.

 

Yeah still at dels or cobalt.

Not gonna pretend otherwise
But im here and ready to live and happy to keep voting waco

 

...

...how is it not clear by now that I'm not good at following directions?

Sigh. Fine...if only 'cause not doing so is too big a dick move even for me. Don't get used to it though.

 

Lack of vote history button may thwart my desire to read into that Cuth vote on Cobalt that I mentioned earlier. Websites that aren't MU smh.

 

We could alter regs plan and let me protect sloth if waco flips town, amy if he flips scum

I wont go rogue unless its approved though

 

Also yes I'll be following the NA plan, read through it a couple of times and didn't see any obvious holes so we should be fine :thumbsup:

 

Waco: am I chopped liver?