See this is why I'd rather just lynch Tom today and have both JOAT's alive because then they can protect/track as necessary and we get more results.

 

No.

Amy protects sloth, you do not target sloth, sloth tracks you.

 

Also fonti said something about me unvoting to noyeet
I wont, but if somehow amy does the plan is off since sloth will have perfect info already


So dont actually have to worry about that because it would be game losing

 

A correct lynch is always better than an incorrect lynch but ok

What happened to 95%? @fontisian

 

Urgh.

Waco, this post is basically unreadable without post links.

 

We need seven Waco votes, or we switch back to Tom.

 

Nope, don't go rouge if it's a townflip, and if Waco flips mafia you can do whatever you want, the games won.

 

Amy does no such thing


But fine

 

tell me, stranger.

 

How many are we at rn?

 

It was the waco wagon thats happening

Thats why i quoted the part that was waco/cuth with no tom

 

Id do votes but someone would probably go back and check up on me lol

 

Is hard to pass up thinking that Rubicons been priming up this entire day to do something like this. The not voting tom thing, the 'lets ask Waco what he thinks thing', it all feels like it's done and almost preplanned to lead to a Waco push. And I do see a lot of Tom/Rubicon scum agenda to that. So please, if this isn't a hit on Waco, and Toms mafia always dunk Rubicon after him.

 

Still agree that those should be the poe if i was mafia

 

Tom/Cobalt never ever a thing.

Rubicon/Amy would be pretty wack and impressive play from Rubicon to pass up a ML of tom and make himself have to get an extra msyeet to win the game, it's probably a pretty unlikely team.

 

waco (5): rubi, tom, fonti, reg, amy

think gemma's still on me, prolly a couple of stragglers still on tom, idk where sloth is

 

Or we could lynch Tom now and Rubicon tomorrow shrugs

 

You know there aren't enough misyeets left in that world for me to accomplish anything with that strategy. I don't write a long ass case on tom/Waco being partners just to get both of them killed in the same phase. I do it because it's the optimal play for town.

 

I should say cobalt over dels for his agenda around now but i just want to give him credit for being here

 

I didn't follow up on the NK thing b/c I'd been too busy to re-read the QT + Sloth admitted it was him. I noted D2 (and when you followed up on it) that I only had Sloth null at SoD2, and as Cuth was LLT for me at the same point, so I was asking you & Reg about it because I felt I could potentially settle two players at once.

My Sloth/Cuth non w/w was a very strong take on Cuth's #130, which I read as something I didn't think would ever come from Cuth if they were paired together. (It's post m/5 in my QT, when you look it up post game).

The oddly notable comment is a reference to the fact the Cobalt and I have had some explosively different reads in a bunch of games, to the point that I've made the comment that "all I need to do to solve the game is flip Cobalts' reads"