My problem with his read on you is more the lack of discussion. It's very wishy washy.

 

Gross.

The other stuff in this post:
When I say come at me bro, I don't mean "hey let's thunderdome" I mean respond to me. But you don't respond to votes/cases against you

And ok, you were talking about owner mindmelding with jan I didn't understand that my bad.

 

Very vaguely.

Also, I really hated owner's;latest post.

---------- Post automerged at 06:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:46 PM ----------

Well not her most recent one, her most recent wall.

 

I generally don't like Owner's wall.

It deserves more than one line so I'll try to get to it before end of day.

 

Vote: owner

 

But isn't this just how fluff plays? Like, deliberate is forethought. Oh man, I'ma play just like when I'm town.
Sure its deliberate if he's scum. But if he's town he's just doing the thing.

 

I get that. But what response do you expect, exactly?

Like people will suspect you. That's the game.

This is owner's last read on me. She's back and forth there, and now I'm solidly mafia. But the two things she pointed out as building her mafia read on me happened loooong before this post.

Vote owner

 

I'm not with you here. Is this a TWTBAW read, only with meta?

---------- Post automerged at 15:52 ---------- Previous post was at 15:51 ----------

IDK man. I'm yelling that youre lock scum and you just ignore me completely for a long ass time.

---------- Post automerged at 15:53 ---------- Previous post was at 15:52 ----------
owner you wanna vote quid with me?

 

Which parts did you hate?
Before I write my reasons.

 

But why?
(this line left intentionally blank)

 

Do you remember the game 3 games ago where we were both town, I nearly got lynched Day 1 as seer (and then died)?

I'm pretty sure if you read that I ignore plenty.

Like, that's just my default behaviour to suspicion. I understand where you're coming from, I disagree (obviously), but I don't see a reason to respond unless I get a tell on you from it or there's a question embedded.

 

Yes you should!

And what happened?

---------- Post automerged at 16:01 ---------- Previous post was at 15:59 ----------

I do not remember that. We played together before that game that didn't happen?

But ok. So you just let me push you and hope it all works out for the best?

 

Hey tom are you going to change your scum reads anytime soon? Cause I think you have a conflict there.

 

Yeah, Cobalt and Fonti were scum, miner tunneled hard on you.

I mean, yes? I hope that other people look at my posts and see towniness and that my future posts demonstrate it to you.

I mean, what's your counterfactual? How do you respond to suspicion of this nature?

 

It is.
Townread me anyway.

---------- Post automerged at 16:05 ---------- Previous post was at 16:04 ----------

What conflict?

Also probably not.

 

owner what changed between your 420 and now to make you decide I'm scum?

 

It's not as much her stated reads that I hate as the reasoning for her reads.

For example:

Lyric: She notices people are townreading her, so owner wants to go with the flow and townread her. And her excuse for that is that...she's completely forgettable and as such is town. Somehow.

Q: She scumreads him for complaining about thread length, which is valid when there's a lot of fluff. (which there was early on). Like there are valid reasons to scumread him, and she touches on none of them.

Miner: pure OMGUS

Tom: pure OMGUS

Vaimes/Rubicon: town because they're townreading her.

Fonti: she just goes "fonti is town for reasons. I don't know what those reasons are, but they exist. Probably. So yeah, she's town" which is gross and feels so fake and calculated.

The whole post is just bad. And not in a towny way.

 

You are saying it happened a while ago as if that should make a difference. It doesn't make a difference how long ago it was.

lol at the vote

Yeah, tom, I'd vote Quiddity

 

Vote Quid
Nice wagons.

 

I decided to move my vote.

:V

Where are you going with these questions.