Comes with the territory of being responsible for like 9 out of the top 10 anime betrayals, even dya never 100% clears me anymore and she knows me better than anyone. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

I do believe them still. I read parts of her scumgame, though, and will discard the part about her being a really obvious wolf. Also feel she's comfortable enough as scum to have played her D1, but that should be obvious given my vote on her.
The frustration post is still a townsided ping from her, but I don't think it's outside of her scumrange.

More importantly, can you reserve any questions you have for me about Beru until after she comes and responds to the cases made against her, please?
--- Post automerged ---

^100%. If you don't have your own reasons for wanting someone lynched (or a really strong townread on someone you're willing to follow, at the very least), you probably shouldn't want them lynched

Thanks for responding.

 

I don't even know that myself and would be surprised if anyone but Bears herself or maybe Rubicon have possible knowledge on the matter.
I don't have it.

 

@Rubicon
Actually, I'd appreciate it if you could specifically focus on Beru and share your read + reasons on her since I'm not clear on your thoughts at all rn

 

Expounding on one of my previous points: A ctrl-F of "Fluff" in Rubicon's iso yields seven results, some of them contained in quotes by other players. Here's all of his own mentions of Fluff:

This is thin and not well developed in the slightest.

 

Jan never read my post where I listed all the games I've played that are still publicly accessible, confirmed.
--- Post automerged ---

Jan never read my post where I listed all the games I've played that are still publicly accessible, confirmed.
--- Post automerged ---
What the fuck is up with this forum and double posting, today? It isn't actually supposed to let you do that.

 

I thought you might be mistaken, considering several players have also referred to Fluff as "HF", but that only yielded one more result: "For some context, Jan is historically very good at reading HF.".

Is the conclusion to sharing those quotes just the "I'd like Rubicon to talk about his view on Fluff." from earlier?

 

Ah, didn't realize the HF thing.

The conclusion is partly what I said earlier, but it's also that I'm specifically asking him about Fluff because I don't like either his progression on or his interactions with Fluff.

 

You home yet? There's several lines of thought that currently hinge on you responding and what your response looks like, so the sooner you can get to my and Jan's questions, the better.
Don't mean to be annoying about it, so sorry if that's how that came off. Just, you're supposed to be the phoneposting specialist and I'd like to see responses.

 

Sidenote: I'll be on mobile starting from tomorrow afternoon through Sunday evening.

 

@GeneralHankerchief Hey, talk to me about Delphine.

 

I was scumreading her for the Jari flip for the same reason... that everyone is scumreading me for the Jari flip...

.... yeah.

Also, her reads were, like, a carousel set to max speed.

I just wanted to know who to watch for defending/attacking her toDay, and made a preliminary list of people who could be partners with her and the reasons why to check over that I could compare against how people actually played regarding her toDay.

And then she died.

 

Actually, nvm.
Sorry.
Post what you got if you've already started responding, but nvm.

 

As the phoneposting specialist, I can tell you that writing long posts on mobile is -ev to mental health.

I am home now, though. Have to get adjusted to the wide screen so I can actually read shit properly, then I'll be able to do things here.
--- Post automerged ---

No. He should do it.

 

Hadn't started responding, but is there any reason for me to *not* give you a quick take on her anyway?

 

No reason not to. Just didn't think it'd be as productive as I thought it was when I asked.

 

Alright, well, seeing as how she hasn't posted yet today, my opinion on her hasn't changed from the legacy post I did yesterday.

To abbreviate, the tone of her posts have been fine but the scope of them have been limited, focusing on one person who is a villager (me) as opposed to, from my eyes, trying to get a more holistic view of the game.

 

You mentioned that yesterday in response to Jan, which is why I asked in the first place.
What makes you say she's got "decent stuff" and "Delphine has actually talked about stuff" and "they're relatively decent in content (even though she's wrong about me)" if you think she's only focused on you?

 

Two things:

First of all, timing. Her iso early on does spread out a bit more before she kind of zeroes in on me as D1 progresses at the expense of the rest of the thread. Secondly, her push on me itself, while coming to an incorrect conclusion, passes the smell test in that I believe that she believes what she's saying w/r/t me especially after I challenged her on a point or two and she didn't back down.

 

lol @ "the smell test".
Fair, though. I checked and she did respond to you after you challenged her on a point, and didn't back down.
Actually, she said, "However, in the different context, I very much don't get the sense that you're detailing to death outside-of-the-thread work you did for no real reason that I can think of other than to try to sound townie." You didn't respond to her there (nothing really to respond to I suppose), but you did have a similar interaction with Fonti.

Fonti said, "I think, on four different occasions, in different ways, you have gone into detail on things you /would/ have done, and these things invariably very towny and perhaps indicative of a towny thought process. But since you never actually did then, simply stating the thoughts feel like an attempt to look town rather than being town. Is explaining as you did in your opening post, when you asked me questions early on and when you talked about how you intended to push on people for content in the last 24 hours part of your normal play?"

To which you responded, "Oh, sorry.

The explanations are sort of part of it? My meta's generally been gearing away from doing it lately but I feel like I'm more inclined to lead into what I'm getting at as town and just fire off the conclusion right away as scum.

I'll assume you want links and I'll start looking for an example in the background but I'd rather stay live with this thread and comment on other things in the meantime.""

What Fonti was talking about was the same reason for my initial vote on you yesterday, about talking up your *fights* without ever doing them. I backed off because I do like your content, tone, and approach (we've even mindmelded on some points), but I am curious if you ever found those links or examples you said you'd look for?
Won't hold it against you if you haven't yet (that was mid-day and there's been other stuff going on), but I'd appreciate it if you follow up with that.
--- Post automerged ---

Fair point. I should be here another 30ish minutes on computer and will probably keep checking phone afterwards, so no big rush (plus 72 hr phase that we're only 7hrs into). Thanks.