As it has been pointed out a couple of times now, trying to make a fic that actually complied with ALL potter laws is inherently impossible as a couple of them are contridictory. It's fun to watch people try though ^.^

 

Yep, I was. :awesome

 

I think you're looking for the intro subforum.

 

Law #??
Amendment

Herein all references to Cho's massive cock must involve the use of either Harry's mouth or Fleur's ass.

 

I can't remember who... Is it Tehan who would not agree with that statement?

 

DLP knew that Albus liked the cock before Rowling did, by God.

 

Ah! Well what the hell... here's my idea for a Potter's Law....

The magical creature, known as Fawkes, is the only phoenix mentioned in canon.

It's known for it's immortally, (Duh!) where on it's burning day it's ashes it births anew. Known also for being very Light and powerful, being able to carry many times it's weight. For it's tears are known to heal most wounds (Basilisk Bites).

Fawkes gave only two feathers out, no more wands (custom and asked for?)! Fawkes, is in no way, a bound wizard/witch in an animgus potion gone wrong! Such as Godric, or Merlin as they are dead and stated in an above Potter Law not possible! Fawkes when around an Evil and or Dark wizard, the firebirds song would scare/hurt them.

So what if Dumbledore is a crazy old coot, but if he were evil, dark or in between. Fawkes would have to say adios, that is unless he is bound by said wizard. Which if given an amendment it would likely say how dark magic wouldn't or shouldn't have that kind of effect... DH may say differently? (Don't know didn't read)

Say is Fawkes intelligent enough to communicate, verbally (beast-talk) or mentally (mind-link)? Just whom is the pet?

When it doesn't seem to just work out with Dumbledore as a familiar, deciding right off it's best to bond with, and most of the time it's with... you guess it... Harry!

Then there are those stories where Fawkes brings Harry, to another place, world and or time.

The wording of this law sucks, and the idea is possibly crap! But hey boredom kicked in that and I had to kick it out!

 

Oopsie-doodle.

 

I've seen this quite a few times in fanfics. Where does this beast talk business come from?

 

POAST? lul.

 

Think the quote was from 'Quidditch through the ages' actually.

Water Mage: 'Beast talk' is the fannon step up from Parseltounge. If there is a magical gift that allows you to speak (specifically) with snakes, then by extrapolation there is one somewhere that should let you speak with any animal. Hence, 'Beastspeak'

Edit: sorry for the Necro. I keep thinking it's still January for some reason. :-/

 

...Why would that long-ass entry about an animal be in a book about quidditch?

 

Because, if I recall correctly, there is a long-ass entry in QTTA on snitches.

 

An entry about a snidget makes sense in a book about quidditch. One entry on a relevant animal doesn't open the possibility of other equally-long entries about non-relevant animals.

To be fair, I haven't read either book, even though common sense dictates that there'd be shit-all to do about phoenixes in a book about quidditch. So I looked it up:

The only time a phoenix is mentioned in the entire book.

 

I hope you mean consensual sex. He was a death eater by choice for a few years, and I always pictured Death Eaters as the type to rape and pillage.

 

And taint their Pureblood genitals with icky low-class muggle and mudblood orifices?! That's disgusting.