1. DLP Flash Christmas Competition + Writing Marathon 2024!

    Competition topic: Magical New Year!

    Marathon goal? Crank out words!

    Check the marathon thread or competition thread for details.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hi there, Guest

    Only registered users can really experience what DLP has to offer. Many forums are only accessible if you have an account. Why don't you register?
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Introducing for your Perusing Pleasure

    New Thread Thursday
    +
    Shit Post Sunday

    READ ME
    Dismiss Notice

Registration is Open

Discussion in 'Announcements' started by Lord Ravenclaw, Nov 3, 2012.

Not open for further replies.
  1. Oz

    Oz For Zombie. Moderator DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Messages:
    9,027
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Baile Átha Cliath
  2. Mishie

    Mishie Fat Dog

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    Messages:
    549
    Location:
    Australia
    What seems to me to be an obvious solution would be to have it that when you first register, you can view whatever thread you want but you're not allowed to post. In the registration form, it will mention that you will need to send a PM to Raven or one of the other mods who will give you the ability to post. This means that it will be harder for the bots to be able to post, and still allows people to lurk and not post.

    And if they're dumb enough to not be able to figure out that it clearly says to send a mod a PM, then are we really losing anything?
     
  3. Antivash

    Antivash Until we meet again... DLP Supporter Retired Staff

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Messages:
    6,957
    Location:
    Ghost Planet
    I think the invitation system would work out better, really. Because every user would have x amount of invites they could use (Which could be reset each month, or after x number of posts.) and the IRC channel would have someone on the staff around. So you still have to talk to someone, but its not overly and unnecessarily complicated.


    Its pretty much what you just said, only without the needless complication of letting people think theyre registering and everything is fine.
     
  4. Alindrome

    Alindrome A bigger, darker mark DLP Supporter Retired Staff

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    2,771
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    England
    But then surely you have the case that it will turn people who don't plan on doing much with their account off registering. The more hassle, the less people are inclined to bother - you may argue 'what will we lose from that?' but I'd reckon a fair few regulars here never thought they'd become one, including myself.
     
  5. Speakers

    Speakers Backtraced

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2010
    Messages:
    697
    Yeah, all this seems a bit complicated. Simple method that requires limited moderation: Restrict posting from Hogwarts Applicant's to 10 posts total. After that they are either accepted or rejected (or even before that when you can determine if human but the 10 post count should act as a buffer so it doesn't restrict their posting much until a mod gets to them and approves them).
     
  6. Gwyll

    Gwyll Sixth Year

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2010
    Messages:
    179
    Location:
    Berkshire, UK
    Is there a way that you could also limit the posts in time? For example, all new applicants can only post in a topic where the previous post is in the last two weeks or so, so you can prevent necros posts.
     
  7. Innomine

    Innomine Alchemist ~ Prestige ~ DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,337
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    New Zealand
    High Score:
    4,500
    I think necros are the least of our problems right now...
     
  8. Antivash

    Antivash Until we meet again... DLP Supporter Retired Staff

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Messages:
    6,957
    Location:
    Ghost Planet
    It would be a hassle. But so would a lot of the other ideas tossed here. This is the kind of thing that you can't make everyone happy with. One group is going to agree, the other thinks you're fucking retarded and how can you alienate your members with <garbage idea here>.

    In the end you have to realize a sacrifice is needed. And my thing is we closed the introduction section for a reason, and to open it again just to filter out spam... Itll be fine for a while, but DLP is DLP and we'll still lose a lot of people to the ones who think we're too elitist or vicious.

    In the end, I would rather go with an invite system rather than go with restricts like 'you can make X number of posts a day' or 'you can only post in this one introduction type area so we know you arent a bot.'

    The reputation system of old should be a clear indicator that DLP can't not fuck shit up like that. It was setup, abused and removed, a second attempt made and more abuse.

    So yeah, Id rather verify that all new accounts are human even if they dont ever intend to post and run off a small number of people that dislike it.
     
  9. World

    World Oberstgruppenführer DLP Supporter Retired Staff

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Messages:
    3,336
    Location:
    Axis of Evil (Original)
    100 bots with 10 posts each is still way too much. Most bots only get off one or two posts, I have never seen one advancing past 7.
     
  10. Tellie571

    Tellie571 First Year

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2008
    Messages:
    44
    So that is what they were doing. I always though it had something to do with chicken :sherlock:

    Anyways I agree with this. Spambots are annoying aren't they?

    hoves up to Ponyville.
     
  11. Insanity

    Insanity Second Year DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Messages:
    57
    Speaking as a long term lurker I would still have registered with the invite system (or anything similar) after I had found that I liked DLP. Eg after I had come back to the site on several different occasions.

    In the end I think the best solution is the one that is easiest for the mods and admins or whoever else is involved regardless of the hoops it makes new users jump through, as if they get fed up of running it it will all fall apart.
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2012
  12. Gwyll

    Gwyll Sixth Year

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2010
    Messages:
    179
    Location:
    Berkshire, UK
    One question about invites, how will potential new people request them?
     
  13. Rubicon

    Rubicon High Inquisitor DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2011
    Messages:
    547
    Location:
    US
    Idea: Run the first 50 posts by a user through Akismet's spam filter API (which is compatible with forums). If Akismet flags a post as spam, delete it automatically. If a large number of a user's posts get flagged by the filter, ban them automatically.
     
  14. Catsy

    Catsy Squib

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2012
    Messages:
    12
    Hi everyone. I didn't post in this thread when I first registered and saw it, because no one else had replied and I wasn't sure if you were supposed to reply to an announcement like this or not.

    Reading the posts about methods of weeding out spambots which don't lend themselves to numeric answers (or anything else that a generic but sophisticated bot could reasonably figure out), I was struck with an idea I thought I'd share. Given the core theme of these forums, what about making people look up (e.g.) the twelfth word in chapter six of The Sorcerer's Stone? The specifics lookups could rotate through a handful of them, and the question could be phrased something like "in the first HP book" so that a bot couldn't just scrape the name of the book and look it up (assuming a generic bot would even have access to that data).

    I can think of a handful of drawbacks to this approach (not least that not every prospective user will own that specific book, or own it in the English language), but it's a thought.

    By the way, thanks for opening up registrations again.
     
  15. Evan Tide

    Evan Tide Chief Warlock DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1,414
    Location:
    So Cal
    All the book prints have different wordings and page counts.
     
  16. Antivash

    Antivash Until we meet again... DLP Supporter Retired Staff

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Messages:
    6,957
    Location:
    Ghost Planet
    Well, like I said, we could keep an IRC channel open for people wanting invites that dont already know members of the forum. Putting a a link or the server information on the registration page.

    Otherwise, they'd get it from a member...
     
    Ash
  17. Rin

    Rin Oberstgruppenführer DLP Supporter

    Joined:
    May 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,327
    Location:
    日本福井県若狭町
    I like the idea of an invite-only system. Most of the would-be legitimate members of our forum will probably come here as a result of reading one our more esteemed member's stories on ff.net or patronuscharm or wherever, and so they can e-mail those authors directly, politely, and using proper, grammatically correct English. Alternatively, as in my case recently, I recommended Catsy's SAO fic, and would have very gladly extended an invite to him.

    I don't think there's a need for any links to any IRC forums with any invite request codes, or whatever, unless it's demonstrable that there's some other source of the majority of new members. Maybe a poll asking our current members how they stumbled on DLP is in order (though, I'll be honest, I can't rightly remember how I came here).
     
  18. yak

    yak Moderator DLP Supporter Retired Staff

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Messages:
    4,001
    Location:
    Australia
    Invites might solve the bot problem, but they create a barrier to entry which would definitely reduce the number of new members. We could do with more new members, not less. Creating extra hurdles for people to jump through before they're participating in the community has an effect on our long term health.
     
  19. Mishie

    Mishie Fat Dog

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    Messages:
    549
    Location:
    Australia
    Like I said before, the easiest way to prevent bots and to still allow random people to join would be to just prevent them from being able to post until they send a mod a PM, if anything, this would be less work than what they already have to do to deal with bots.
     
  20. Antivash

    Antivash Until we meet again... DLP Supporter Retired Staff

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Messages:
    6,957
    Location:
    Ghost Planet
    Functionally, there is absolutely no difference between an invite system save for the fact that for the people who don't read the shit on a registration page will have no fucking clue whats going on. This idea is, on top of being bad, needlessly more complicated than an invite system would be.

    I think, from a users point of view, talking to a staff member or what have you before registration would be the better choice. Why give someone the false impression they've registered? And it wouldnt even solve the issue.

    An invite system would completely stop bots unless you have someone turning up to ask for invites for each an every one.

    I'd love to be able to take this idea seriously, but you're going to have to give me an absolutely fool-proof method of blocking spam without inflicting actual users with hoops and hurdles.

    Like I said before, yes. an invite system will turn away bots and users. But its impossible for us to keep quality of service for everyone without some kind of sacrifice. An invite system would be the most idea, since its a fairly simple process. Itll have the least impact on registration and users.

    Limiting posts to so many a day or only in so-and-so a forum doesnt do anything to stop the problem. Bots only get one or two posts before someone finds them in most cases. Yes, putting it all in one spot would make it easier to clean, but you're resurrecting introductions again, and we all know how that will end.

    So, yeah. Your opinion is your opinion, and you're free to disagree. But from where I sit, invites are the most preferable solution, lower registrations or no.
     
Loading...
Not open for further replies.