Hey Von, tell me about dlgn, font, and the typhon wagon please.

 

Apparently he also does that as scum?

 

Tom, let's put font and math aside for a moment. How do you feel about Miner so far?

 

Mal, since you're on, how do feel about Q?

 

Because he's bad.

Still town though.

 

He seems less fun.
Could be a sign of getting down to business after a bad scum game, but right now I'm tending towards he wants to be solvey.
We'll see if he manages to do so.

---------- Post automerged at 21:48 ---------- Previous post was at 21:46 ----------

This is the thug I like btw.
I thought I'd never see this thug again after otg.
You get to be my fake top town.

 

No.

I believe the phrase is "lack of guile". He's not holding downback, so even when people like mathblade whiff slow normals in front of his face, he's not ready to flash kick them.

. . .

That was funnier in my head. Still true though.

 

I suck at fighting games.

 

I have no idea what this means, lol.


I like this one.

 

Get used to it, tommy.

?

You mean individual reads on the first two?

 

I mean, the short exchange about Typhon that ended with me goading DLGN into voting him, and what that says about both of them, ect ect.

 

Me
His Fluffiness
Von
Math
Miner
Cobalt
Q?

Everyone else

Typhon
Tom

Seems right.

 

Yep, seems "right".

Day1 Vote Fontisian

 

Color me intrigued, thug

---------- Post automerged at 22:12 ---------- Previous post was at 22:10 ----------

Fonti are you legit sticking to a "tom doesn't believe his read" reasoning?

 

The vote wasn't really a good look for dLGN. Looks too appease-y.

font's vote was fine. I've agreed with font a lot, which is almost as surprising as fluff being like, the top townread by page two.

Also what are you doing.

 

What have you agreed with fonti about?

 

Yep. Shame Fonti doesn't see why. Town!Fonti would pick up on the problem.

 

Almost everything.

I could initially see where her read on you was coming from, and agreed with it, but her further reasoning for it is eh, not so sure.

 

What reasoning are you referring to by future reasoning?

 

Further, not future.