She admitted earlier in the game she understood why she thought it was similar. Go check. I'll wait.

 

I understood that to mean he was the only vote at the time. As in, Cuth had moved on to voting elsewhere.

 

.. Ok.. Maybe.. But you're no fun.

 

She mentioned a turbo but I never saw her mention WH?

 

I still think it's similar to both. And while I understand you and stanari don't agree, I'm going to trust my gut over either of yours, so you can just suck it.

 

Are you talking about fontisian?

 

Maybe it'll work out better than your yeti read in WH. \o/

 

Maybe it'll work out like me trying to get GE killed all fucking game. Oh wait...no one would follow me there or onto 113. Hmmm, I guess I was the one who should be ashamed of my reads.

 

Uh what? Maybe I didn't say it clearly enough, but I WAS the only vote on you for a long time and that was the time period you were ignoring my vote for "not being scary". And I'm still the only vote now, and you ignored that vote whilst you did a whole analysis post about the votals.

Maybe this is just a playstyle clash, but given you don't even remember why I voted for you, how is my case bad? I don't even think my case on you was airtight or anything, so it's just really strange that basically just shrugged and went on your way.

 

Yes they are.

 

*...that you basically...

 

In all fairness yeti had a priest read on me and couldn't make a case on me

But GE was a bit odd

 

Don't care. I'm tired of being read as lackluster when barely anyone will interact with me and really, it's just that they don't agree with one fucking read. Fable can get rekt.

 

B-But you're wrong.......

Also no it's not just because of the fonti read, I find all your cases lackluster so far.

 

Well it wasn't something i felt was like you said airtight, rather very full of holes. Why should i get defensive over a case on things that are just wrong, even if you find them scummy? Especially considering that i didnt see you seemed to even have much presence in the thread. Especially since you're just wrong.

I didnt have time at the moment. And why go back to it?

As for Cuth, i was tired but around and got questions before i had caught up and he said i had a bad read so i explained it. I had time.

But fine make your case again and I can defend myself if you want. Or if you had some question or.. What ever the problem is cause i dont see it tbh

 

Why? Actually fucking evaluate them. Instead of just saying "I don't like it". Because I could care less if you like it or not. I'm trying to evaluate people.
--- Post automerged ---
"cases" is interesting since I've only fleshed one out.

 

For The record im Phone posting atm so can't continue the isos yet

 

You did do a prophy "ISO" (was only like 3 quotes I think) that I thought was kinda reachy.

 

Ok, you think it was reachy. Now tell me why. It's not that fucking hard. It was only 3 posts, right?

 

@dyachei did you read my thoughts on Jan? Comments?