Wolfy post.

Mostly pointless question, weird thing to reply to given state of thread.
--- Post automerged ---

It's happening. Dot gif.

 

I'm too lazy to rainbow text this, but imagine I did so.
--- Post automerged ---

 

Err, most likely, yes...? I'll probably do it with more than one person before day end. Is my doing it indicative of something?

 

I feel like I'm going to pull up a Stanari ISO sometime tomorrow and be like, ????? to the one liners.

--

Scott, Zack, maybe Vira are townreads.

Kalas I voted for because he voted himself in RVS. Voting yourself in RVS has historically been a scumtell in the past, because it shows that you don't want to commit to voting any other person/make them mad, so you're not committing to a vote on anybody else by voting yourself. In my experience, RVS "scumtells" like these don't really work all that often but they're a decent place to look at early game. The last time I had success with catching people out of RVS was like in, 2013.

I want to scumread tom because Zack's scumreading him + Zack caught tom the last game we played, but I don't know if that's me wanting internally to OMGUS tom because he's been vote parking on me or if I actually find his posts sketchy. I find tom extraordinarily difficult to read which is why I asked Zack for reasoning.

Everyone else is at various stages of null. Once I finish this discrete math homework I'll start interacting with people again, just wanted to give people a sense of where my headspace is at right now.

 

@Prophylaxis

Explain the Vira townread.

 

Jumpin Jesus this post is wolfy. What an over explanation.

 

well proph/Zack are pretty much never w/w with this plan to blame him when I flip
--- Post automerged ---
Proph/vira?

 

tom accepting his death already?

 

The moment I signed up tbh

 

Proph/Vira/Stanari.

Nevermind the fact that we're still missing a large number of posters.

 

I initially wanted to like this because it does seem plausible (at least with the last part about trying to pick my brain on how to read tom), then I wanted to dismiss it as blatant pandering to me, now I kinda like the first gut reaction again, which might indicate it was calculated pandering to further cement himself on the "against tom" side (after tom was pushing him).

How much more do I need to do to die tonight, btw.

 

I like.

 

Because Scott said:

I wanted to know if he was going to ISO her because otherwise what is he doing? Why concentrate on only one person?

 

What about that bronana, tom?

 

Also wow I'm a page and a half behind, hang on.

 

Vira with more cherry picking than kami.

In other news, it got dark in here. Am I in a tunnel?
--- Post automerged ---

I don't think he has been particularly alignment indicative so far.

 

That's a first.

He's usually two pages ahead!

 

I'm confused...

1. He said he "might look through her posts," what else would that mean besides ISOing?

2. I don't really get what you mean, what's he doing / why focus on just one person. What's wrong with ISOing someone you think is scum but might be reconsidering your read on?

3. It still seems like a really pointless question to ask. Like if I said I might watch Dennis Smith Jr. tonight, and someone asked me, "are you going to watch the Mavs game?" Because the answer is just ... well, duh?

 

I'm pure as driven snow @Fable

 

2/10