Also applies to Jarizok I think.

 

113, Proph, Miner
Vira, Scott
Newcomb, Tsaiah
Fable, Fonti, Jari, Zack
Cuth, SS, Street
Dya, Koalas, SR, Tom, Wei
GH, Vaimes

Reads?

 

The problem is, wolves are often unproductive. I also can't see where Kalas said that the key is to lynch unproductive people rather than scum. Can you point it out?

 

Honestly I read the first sentence or so and my eyes kinda glazed over the rest, heh.
--- Post automerged ---

I thought about making a reads list earlier, then justified not doing so by remembering there's still over 48 hours left before we lynch GH.

 

I haven't been pinged into side eyeing you yet is a more accurate way of saying it, but sure, take a townread.

 

@yeavoxxtalknah

I have a town read on GH for raisins.

I will not keep you updated.

 

Wolves are unproductive but try to mask it - sometimes by directing the thread to lynch "unproductive people" as opposed to actual wolves, that's the difference.

And on further review I guess Koalas wasn't doing that, but it certainly felt like he was leading up to it.

 

Are you confusing reads and RNG again?

 

INCORRECT!

 

What's wrong with my reads : (

 

Do you think you are being unproductive?

 

I don't quite understand why Stanari has .113 so high. Care to explains Stanari?
--- Post automerged ---

Oooh, ask me, ask me!

 

The copypasta. But the miner stuff is more confusing to me.

Miner didn't pay any attention to champs so I wouldn't expect him to get the reference. He could say well "I would never say that stuff and miner should know that" which maybe? But to me it just looked like a clueless miner out leveling himself.

 

I could probably be actually looking for wolves right now, but I don't feel like it. Part of me also wants to keep egging you on.

 

There being 7 tiers is a good hint something not quite how it should be, never even mind who's where.

 

I feel like the fact that he spent a while persistently talking about derpclears is a good look when combined with the fact that he just spent a game getting successfully derpcleared as scum.

I think Newcomb did say that, actually.

 

If the reads spoke for themselves would we be having this conversation? No, we would not. How you reached those reads is just as important as the reads themselves. It's that method I'm trying for a better grasp on.

And I never said a word about lynching unproductive people. Stop deflecting.

 

What's wrong with finely grained categories?

 

GH:

Also GH:

 

Okay, let's start over. Give me the reads of mine you have a problem with. I'll go into more detail.

Zack: I'm not allowed to be a hypocrite?