Voting is the only way to pressure someone: Without the direct threat of death, it might as well not exist.

I don't think a flippant remake with an early post is an indication either way for alignment.

As for the Q, yes but I'm not going first.

 

Probably not, but I want Proph to say something.

 

Does questioning them on things not work just as well?

---------- Post automerged at 09:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:19 PM ----------

@Luckylee: You also never gave me a read on Fonti, If wouldn't mind.

 

!!! It's your lucky second chance draw !!!

You won the chance to ask a non-trash question.

Please do so immediately.

typicaly no

 

Bill Door
Post 51: Lumps votes himself. Votes Aekiel without an explanation. Brings up roleclaiming.
Post 54: Justifies his vote for Aekiel. The first and third points are good. The second isn’t fair to Aekiel, when he already talked about his time issues in the sign up thread.
Post 58: Jokes about Kai being scum.
Post 61: Assumes that the judge lynch plan is more than a one day thing and argues against it.
Post 67: Continues the role claiming joke.
Post 74: Comment about the Angels to Luckylee
Post 76: Complaint about people not reading things properly.
Bill Door’s posting to post. The naked vote on Aekiel is something I don’t feel he would do as scum, and I would put money on it not being distancing. Bringing up role claiming was weird. The rest of it is just detached from the game, without any real scum hunting, but I’ve seen Bill Door do this as both scum and town. Let’s call him null with a very slight town lean.

Kai: Your turn.

Luckylee: Read the beginning of post 59 and respond, please.

 

I have no particular read on Bill Door, though I have a personal preference for not killing people who are willing to joke back when I troll them.

 

It's also possible that I don't want you to vote for Kai because I would rather you vote for me.

---------- Post automerged at 02:44 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:42 AM ----------

This doesn't mean you shouldn't be questioning people as much as possible.

 

Alright, I'll bite. Why should we vote for you?

 

Because I think I'm quite good at scumhunting, I'll use it to lynch scum players. Also I'm not usually top of the N1 scum kill list.

---------- Post automerged at 02:50 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:50 AM ----------

And I'm not a mean, panda-hating Australian.

 

Wow that's hitting well below my bespoke panda fur belt.

 

I think lurking is scummy when discussion is going on. I've repeatedly tried to engage Proph and "he's content to lurk". That seems scummy to me.

 

I guess you missed this.

Please unmiss it immediately.

 

I didn't miss it, I was ignoring you. I asked my question, I want Proph to say something and considering he's looking at the thread atm I'm pretty sure he will.

 

Lucky, which do you think is worse? Not saying anything, or refusing to say anything useful?

 

Either Lucky hasn't seen my question, or is ignoring it. I'll admit, even with Proph telling us he'd lurk, it still seems scummy, but Luckylee is focusing a tad too much on this. As far as I know, he's only answered a couple other questions.

Lynch Vote
Luckylee

 

Fake or real: asking a question prevents other players from making posts

 

Not sure what you mean there, but that may be the fact that the Valium I took earlier just kicked in.

 

I thought you were talking to Fonti, Proudboar. I think Fonti is playing hyper aggressive as usual which always looks town. Also, I don't have any other questions to ask atm, thankfully I don't need your permission to ask em Kal. I'm tunneling on Proph because it's bothering me a lot.

 

Ah, thank you, lucky.

Also, Current Lynch Votes

1 Luckylee by Proph
1 Proph by Luckylee
2 Zeitgeist by Wetnurse, Blab
1 Blab by Rubicon
2 Aekiel by KaiDASH and Bill_Door

Unvote