Mind a third (biased) take?

Think Vaimes hit it on the head when he said it was suspicion / not a townread. Not being able to understand at all what a player's doing is generally not a good thing.

---------- Post automerged at 11:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:40 PM ----------

Guy has a point.

 

Which three?

I need to study my meta.

 

He used weird for both town and mafia, which miner took as generally weird, but any town observer would keep in mind aa town defense.

Rubicon: I'm leaning towards more likely partners than the average not you person, but only just.

---------- Post automerged at 02:45 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:42 AM ----------

I disagree. Town do weird shit all the time. We both know it. You introduced the idea of miner being weird town as opposed to outed mafia, and prompted people to give him the benefit of the doubt. Do you disagree with that interpretation.

 

Hypothesis: font and Miner roll scum together. Miner is overexcited. font considers him a sinking ship and busses Day 1. Miner gets annoyed and snaps at a villager for FoS'ing him because he feels like it's font's fault he's getting heat.

 

Newcomb, what exactly do you think is weird about miner's behavior?

 

I'm glad Miner's asleep/hiding in scumchat because it means I get to be #topposter.

I said I didn't care, but I lied.

 

Why would I bus d1 when I'm the only one who seems to be able to read him?

 

So, good news and bad news.

I'm the priest.

 

I stopped reading this post after "why would I bus D1."

 

Vaimes' exchange with fonti was town!Vaimes. Standard Vaimes spiel.

Mildly concerned with Reg defending the idea of early/RVS tonereads "scum haven't had a chance to get comfortable and are thus obvious in ways they aren't later" spiel and then not actually having any of those reads.

I'd probably be townreading fonti from Obs because I agree with most of her hottakes.

That little exchange I had with Koalas felt slightly town in a way I'm not sure I can articulate or really even believe but it's there.

Bout it.

 

For your future reference when you're doing that study, 166, 168, 170, 175 and 177 are all well outside your scumrange imo.

Especially the picking up on and analyzing possible flaws or inconsistencies in font's posts.

 

Is the phrase "lolcatting with words" not descriptive enough?

 

I would say no. It doesn't actually give anything concrete to read your thought process by.

 

Seriously though, when was the last time I actually tried to kill a teammate not named Atum D1? I can't remember. (In a forum game, as well, I suppose, bussing works way too well in video mafia for some reason). I only bussed Atum because he straight up only posted tmi from the witch chat.

---------- Post automerged at 02:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:50 AM ----------

It means basically nothing, yes.

 

Also, which of my gotta les do you agree with? I can only see two, 9r maybe three, in addition to two points of disagreement, which makes your statement strange.

 

My own plus sign?

 

Think Vira's likely to be town here.

Don't see how you got to scum on Rubicon.

 

My own red cross logo?
My own strangely symmetrical stick figure?

 

"I've never done it before" != "I'm not doing it right now"

I'm gonna back away before this turns into a tunnel. Do your thing and we'll reconvene.